Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rasta.diary

Channel

rasta.diary

@rastaadiary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,688subscribers

-150 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001165105662
TypeChannel
Username@rastaadiary
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rastaadiary

Growth

1,6881,8381,76325 August 2026 — 1,838 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,838 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,688 subscribers25 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,666–1,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 22:241,688-138
25 Aug 2026, 13:531,826-12
25 Aug 2026, 02:461,838no change
25 Aug 2026, 02:301,838first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 1,688 subscribers
Avg views / post
187
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 August 202624 August 2026)
Views total3,368
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2769.2%
💔717.9%
👍512.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rastaadiary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

سال اول قبولیم بعد کلاسا مستقیم میرفتم سالن مطالعه بیمارستان که تا کشیک همسرم تموم میشه درس بخونم بعدش باهم بریم خونه، محیط خوب و آرومی داشت و چون بیشتر بچه هاهم اکسترن و اینترن بودن و در حال درس خوندن بودن باعث ایجاد حس رقابت میشد و به خوندن ترغیبت میکرد. ولی بدیش این بود که تقریبا هر روز یدفعه صدای شیون و فریاد از حیاط بیمارستان بلند میشد جوری که حواس همه رو پرت میکرد، بعد از چند دقیقه بچه ها دوباره ادامه میدادن و

1💔1

24 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026

صدای جیغ و داد و شیون خانما و آقایون همسایه مون که انگار عزیزی رو از دست دادن از صبح قطع نمیشه و دیگه داره عصبیم می کنه با اینکه در و پنجره ها رو بستم و سعی می کنم خودمو مشغول کنم ولی صداشون رو اعصابمه

💔1

24 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

چی شد که انقد بی تفاوت شدیم نسبت به دیدن رنج آدمها

💔3

24 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,970 views1 reactionsread 25 August 2026

ولی من فکر میکنم این رفتار بخاطر کمبودای خود اون آدمه بخاطر احساس و سرکوبی که تجربه کرده، دفعاتی که تو ذوقش خورده باعث شده خودشم بدون اینکه متوجه باشه هم ذوق داشتن توی خودش بمیره هم ذوق بقیه رو بمیرونه

👍1

24 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC78 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @navdanizhenmanFile

File, posted without a caption

24 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC77 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026

از ویژگی های خانوادگی ما اینه که تابستون بیرون نمیریم چون گرمه، زمستون بیرون نمیریم چون سرده روز تعطیل بیرون نمیریم چون شلوغه بقیه روزا هم بیرون نمیریم چون سرکاریم

👍32

24 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

دنبال یه دلیل برای پرواز بگرد حتی وقتی هزار تا دليل برای سقوط داری✨

3

23 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @kiimiiyagar

یعنی چی که تو اینستا دارن لباسای پاییزی معرفی میکنن؟!من هنوز لباسای تابستونیمو نخریدم

💔2👍1

23 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC86 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026

روز پزشک رو تبریک میگم به همه ی پزشکای فداکار و دانشجوهای مظلومی که با وجود تموم مشغله ها سختی ها و گرفتاری هاشون، برای بهتر کردن حال بیمار همیشه آماده و پرانرژین 🤍💚 و یه تبریک ویژه برای همسر عزیزم که همیشه با وجود تموم خستگی هاش برای بیمارا از جون مایه میذاره مفهوم پزشک خوب بودن به معنی واقعی کلمه ست و تبریک میگم به خواهرای عزیزدلم، که در میسر پزشک شدن هستید و میدونم هر جا هستید بهترینید و امیدوارم همیشه بدرخشید

4

23 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

امیدوارم امروزت پر از انرژی اتفاق های خوب و خبرهای خوش باشه🫰🏻

3

22 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC84 viewsread 25 August 2026

چقد جای یه کسی که بهم امر و نهی کنه و بگه چکار کنم چیکار نکنم تو زندگیم خالیه

22 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026

باید بگم که منتظر اون لحظه‌ای که ناگهان پر از انگیزه می‌شی نباش؛ انگیزه هیچ‌وقت نمی‌آد. باید بتونی با بی‌حوصلگی، بی‌میلی و بی‌رمقی شروع کنی.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rastaadiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,119,915 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rasta.diary” (@rastaadiary), 1,688 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rastaadiary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.