Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net +124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,744–7,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 16:40
7,899
+3
7 Sept 2026, 12:59
7,896
+20
2 Sept 2026, 12:14
7,876
-10
30 Aug 2026, 18:46
7,886
+15
27 Aug 2026, 23:27
7,871
+30
25 Aug 2026, 01:13
7,841
+30
21 Aug 2026, 03:02
7,811
+18
18 Aug 2026, 05:32
7,793
+6
15 Aug 2026, 05:33
7,787
+23
11 Aug 2026, 13:48
7,764
-3
8 Aug 2026, 05:25
7,767
-8
7 Aug 2026, 11:17
7,775
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
253 reactions across 21 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
65
25.7%
custom 5301201201998625936
35
13.8%
😁
34
13.4%
custom 5424947159780855423
30
11.9%
custom 5319014690527935419
24
9.49%
👍
22
8.70%
👎
21
8.30%
custom 5375226170230987109
8
3.16%
👏
7
2.77%
custom 5258383045232183945
4
1.58%
🥰
3
1.19%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raven_p2p. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Долго искали рабочие связки и мануалы.
А решение всё это время было рядом.
Пока все ищут новые методы, реальность стала такой: 👺
— банки всё внимательнее относятся к переводам на карты;
— реквизиты приходится постоянно менять;
— покупка крипты становится дороже и менее удобной.
Есть способ, который закрывает сразу несколько задач.
QRHunter / софт для ловли P2C-заявок 🥺
Как это работает:
1. Пополняете свою карту…
📢 НОВЫЙ КОНКУРС 🏆
Запускаем новый конкурс для команд Mercurio🔥
Рейтинг формируется по общему обороту за период с 18 августа по 1 сентября ❤️
🥇 1 место – MacBook Air 🌟
🥈 2 место – iPhone 17 Pro Max 📱
🥉 3 место – AirPods 🎧
Победителей определим по общему обороту за весь конкурс. Чем выше объём, тем выше место в рейтинге 🏆
❗️В конкурсе участвуют как обычные Фермы, так и трейдеры, работающие по метке «Залив».
Даты …
Силовики проводят массовые обыски на Горбушке. Московский рынок переворачивают вверх дном по делу криптообменников. Официально криптообменники могут работать до 1 июля 2027 года без включения в реестр ЦБ. @bankrollo
🔘🔘🔘
Сбер отменил комиссию за переводы внутри банка
Теперь можно переводить безлимитно без комиссии
Также увеличили лимит:
🟢 лимит снятия наличных до 3 млн в месяц с подпиской СберПрайм, но в сутки можно снять до 300к.
🟢 лимит на переводы в другие банки по СБП также увеличили до 300к без комиссии с подпиской СберПрайм.
🟩🟩
Если искали iPhone с джейлбрейком на iOS 15–16.5.1, то есть хорошие новости.
У моего друга появились такие телефоны уже с готовым джейлбрейком. Купили — и можно сразу работать, ничего дополнительно настраивать не нужно.
Можете ставить хоть 100+ лк в 1 iPhone и максимально оптимизировать в работу. Советую.
В наличии есть разные модели, вплоть до iPhone 14 Pro Max.
Если будете брать, напишите @hermesans, что вы от …
проясню один момент.
Я лично в эту историю не лезу. (речь про проц)
Слишком специфичная тема, слишком много мусора вокруг и людей, которые только воздух продают, скамят.
Но есть человек, которого я знаю лет 5.
Знаю что мусор не принимает, работает стабильно.
По крайней мере там вас хотя бы не поведут как очередных мамонтов))) ручаюсь, а я это редко делаю
имейте ввиду, сам проц это не мусор,
а 90% площадок это мусор…
👎20😁8
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @raven_p2p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@raven_p2p named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@tygydychka_crypto named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@qreal_fndr named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Арбитражник с авито @eldarmamaev · 65,766 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 August 2026
Питупи @mediap2p · 90,806 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
ФинТех|Обмен валют @FinTechExchange1 · 23,744 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 17 September 2026
Satoshkin @satoshkin · 31,927 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 5 September 2026
Cartesius channel @LexagencyLawStream · 29,614 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
Тот самый 115-ФЗ @tot115fz · 26,517 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
Менделеевщина! @mendeleevshina · 23,888 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Raven | P2P | Арбитраж” (@raven_p2p), 7,899 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raven_p2p.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.