Channel name was changed to «Chat»
Channel
Chat
@razvitie_lich
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002128994301 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @razvitie_lich |
| Description | Chat |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 24 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/razvitie_lich |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Videos
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4m 03s
- Average length
- 2m 02s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 31.1% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2024 to 1 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🙈🙄 Сегодня второй день подряд я провожу в банке и налоговой. Вчера день прошел в многочасовой очереди, заполняя бумаги и ожидая своей очереди. И тем не менее, ушла ни с чем. То программа не загружалась, то сложности с паролями и данными. Сегодня было несколько легче, но все равно немного утомительно. Я задумываюсь, насколько сложно было бы все это делать без современных технологий. Как все же приятно, когда в конц…
🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Совет, чтобы делать то, чего не хочется🔋 Определить, действительно ли вы хотите то, чего не делаете, можно при помощи метода «5 почему». Например, «хочу пройти курс по ораторскому мастерству»: • Почему? Чтобы чувствовать себя уверенней и точней выражать свои мысли. • Почему? Чтобы отстаивать свою позицию в команде. • Почему? Чтобы работать над тем, что мне интересно. • Почему? Чтобы развивать свои навыки. • Почему?…
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
РЕШИЛИ ДЕЙСТВОВАТЬ?! Прекрасно!))) Тогда повторим простые но базовые этапы, сделаем это чтобы не усугуьлять негативную фантазию нашего мозга, который и без гото мега-космос, любит драматизировать 😄🙈 🥁 И так, чтобы начать действовать и решить какую-то проблему или задачу, важно сделать следующие, простые шаги: 1️⃣ Определить цель или задачу: Четко сформулируйте, что именно вы хотите достичь или решить. 2️⃣ Разбей…
👍14
📍📝 Возьмите на вооружение, прежде чем начнете действовать! ➡️ Взвесьте со всех сторон важность решения вашего вопроса/проблемы/задачи. Действительно ли вам нужен будет этот результат? ➡️ Это ваше искреннее пожелание, необходимость или это навязано извне? ➡️ Что изменится, когда вы достигнете желаемого? ➡️ Стоят ли ваши старания и время этого результата, сделает ли он лично вас счастливым? Благодаря этим несложн…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @razvitie_lich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Buy_Sale_Channels · 6341 postКупить или продать Telegram канал | Buy TG Sale - Биржа Telegram каналов
@Buy_Sale_Channels1 · 8261 postКупить рекламу в Телеграм | Биржа Buy TG Sale - продвижение вашего бизнеса через Телеграм
@Buy_TGSale · 6241 postIgnite Digital Agency
@Ignite_Digital_Agency · 371 postPSY
@wom_diary · 121 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chat” (@razvitie_lich), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razvitie_lich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.