Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТВОИ КРЫЛЬЯ | ПСИХОЛОГИ ОНЛАЙН

Channel

ТВОИ КРЫЛЬЯ | ПСИХОЛОГИ ОНЛАЙН

@rckrylia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,164subscribers

-65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001643375662
TypeChannel
Username@rckrylia
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rckrylia

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,16415,23215,1987 August 2026 — 15,229 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,230 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,232 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,227 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,222 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,220 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,220 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,219 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,213 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,207 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,204 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,197 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,194 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,193 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,189 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,184 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,186 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,182 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,184 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,183 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,185 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,187 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,182 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,171 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,172 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,174 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,168 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,169 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,170 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,165 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,164 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,154–15,242 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:0215,164-1
16 Sept 2026, 17:1515,165-5
14 Sept 2026, 20:1815,170+1
13 Sept 2026, 08:0015,169+1
11 Sept 2026, 07:5515,168-6
8 Sept 2026, 14:0015,174+2
5 Sept 2026, 05:3915,172+1
3 Sept 2026, 08:5815,171-11
2 Sept 2026, 02:4915,182-5
1 Sept 2026, 04:1415,187+2
31 Aug 2026, 03:3615,185+2
30 Aug 2026, 02:2415,183-1
29 Aug 2026, 05:2515,184+2
28 Aug 2026, 03:2315,182-4
27 Aug 2026, 01:3315,186+2
25 Aug 2026, 22:4515,184-5
24 Aug 2026, 19:4515,189-4
23 Aug 2026, 01:1315,193-1
21 Aug 2026, 17:1715,194-3
20 Aug 2026, 12:0315,197first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.87%
avg views ÷ 15,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held46 (30 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total12,495
Reactions total467
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 58m
Average length
39m 28s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,695 reactions across 45 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,16768.8%
🔥23914.1%
👍1066.25%
🙏573.36%
💯482.83%
😍171.00%
👏160.944%
🕊140.826%
custom 5260240416724241733120.708%
👌60.354%
🤔60.354%
😢50.295%
🥰20.118%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC389 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Я календарь переверну — и снова… Ой. Чего это я? Но календарь таки перевернулся, сентябрь официально тут, а значит, пора выяснить: что у вас осенью по плану? Костры рябин? Кофе в повышенных дозах? Родительские чаты? Листайте, находите себя и признавайтесь в комментариях кто вы этой осенью?

19

2 Sept 2026, 20:48 UTC537 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52602404167242417337

2 Sept 2026, 18:48 UTC665 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Как перестать зависеть от чужого мнения и начать жить своей жизнью Вебинар Максима Курлыкова Можно иметь работу, семью, детей, выплачивать ипотеку — и всё равно чувствовать себя ребёнком, которому необходимо чужое одобрение. Почему мнение окружающих становится важнее собственной жизни и как вернуть себе право решать? Об этом рассказывает психолог Максим Курлыков. 00:00 — Сколько решений в своей жизни вы принимает

11👍3🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC574 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

А как поступили бы вы? В среду мама позвонила: — В субботу едем на дачу. Я договорилась, будут менять окна. Мне одной с рабочими не справиться. Не спросила. Сообщила. И Марина услышала собственный голос, который сказал: «Мам, в субботу не могу. Давай другой день». Первое «нет» за сорок три года. Дальше была тишина. Мама не перезвонила ни в четверг, ни в пятницу. Сестра ничего не передавала, соседи не звонили, из

2

1 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,020 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026

С 1 сентября, родители! Как маме и папе школьников пережить новый учебный год Профессиональным и личным опытом делится психолог Юлия Аверьянова. Решаем задачку. Дано: семья из трёх человек — папа, мама и второклассник Васечка. Вопрос: сколько человек идут в школу 1 сентября? По моему опыту, как минимум двое: мама и Вася. Иногда ещё папа, но он обычно подключается ближе к вечеру, когда выясняется, что на завтра ну

58🔥21

31 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,120 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Мне 40+, а я до сих пор жду большого и сильного Еду в маршрутке с работы, устала как собака. Рядом на светофоре, останавливается «Мерседес». За рулём — одноклассница. Окно опущено, едет по своим делам. А я вишу на поручне и думаю: "ну, наверное, она... заслужила". Каждый едет на том транспорте, который заслужил. Но, ё-моё, а как этот транспорт меняют? Я всю жизнь пахала как проклятая. По 10–12 часов, в выходные н

34👍3🕊2🔥1

30 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,190 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Первый муж погиб, второй ушёл: как мама четверых детей справляется в одиночку О чём эта история: * Смерть первого мужа и тяжёлый второй брак * Соло-мама четверых * Муж-манипулятор * Преддепрессивное состояние Первый муж погиб, второй ушёл. Младшему из четверых детей — 6 месяцев. Декрет без постоянного заработка. Бабушка отстранилась: «Не умеешь мужиков выбирать». Можно ли в такой ситуации заниматься танцами, путеш

39🙏28👍4🔥4

29 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,240 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Слишком придирчивая? Как после 35 встретить своего человека, не соглашаясь на "лишь бы был" Чтобы сходить на второе свидание в юности, аргумента «у неё глаза красивые», «на гитаре играет» хватало. После 30–35 критерии усложняются. И парадокс: чем лучше мы знаем себя, чем больше вложились в собственное развитие, тем сложнее встретить того, с кем этого второго свидания захочется. И нет, мы не капризничаем. Просто пон

45

28 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,320 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

«Осенняя соната»: разбор фильма фильмотерапевтом Марией Усошиной Эти два отрывка из фильма «Осенняя соната» 1978 года режиссёра Ингмара Бергмана. Известная пианистка Шарлотта после семи лет разлуки приезжает к взрослой дочери Эве. Несколько дней вместе превращаются в разговоры о том, о чём они молчали много лет. Эва — недолюбленная дочь. Холодная, отвергающая, нарциссическая мать выбирала гастроли и карьеру. А в её

34🔥11🙏2👍1

27 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,610 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Для тех, кто уже 18+ В «Твоих Крыльях» мы каждый месяц добавляем новые обучения в разных форматах, чтобы быть актуальными и давать вам знания, которыми можно пользоваться прямо сейчас. И в сентябре у нас для вас супер-анонс. 14 сентября стартует полностью новый курс «Я — взрослый». И когда мы говорим «новый», это не несколько дополнительных уроков: программа переписана на 100%, все материалы отсняты заново. О чём

40👏2👌1🤔1

26 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,370 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶🩶 Самые полезные посты в нашем канале Как забыть бывшего: техники, которые помогут пережить разрыв Эфир психолога Юлии Аверьяновой. Созависимость: 10 признаков, которые женщины обычно не замечают Почему интересную женщину не выбирают Разбор психолога Антона Зинькевича. Слова самоподдержки, которые помогут в трудные минуты Тест «5 языков любви» Чтобы разобраться, как вы и ваш партнёр привыкли выражать и

🔥1510🕊2😍2

25 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,460 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Он сидел в одиночке 37 лет Изучил каждый сантиметр. Если здесь наступить, скрипнет койка. Вот сейчас по коридору охрана пойдёт. Сосед за этой стенкой во столько храпеть начнёт... Сегодня снова придёт адвокат. Уже несколько месяцев предлагает подать апелляцию. Говорит: шансы очень хорошие — процентов семьдесят, что досрочку дадут. Но он снова откажется. Живёт плохо. Но понятно. Вы не представляете, до какой степе

🔥3424🕊3😢3

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @rckrylia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rckrylia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTCAnonymous Poll243 voters

Если с_кса не было — значит, измены не было? Представьте, что ваш партнёр делает что-то из перечисленного. Что лично вы назовёте изменой?

  1. тайная переписка79%
  2. регулярный флирт с другими69%
  3. эмоциональная близость с бывшей или коллегой76%
  4. приложения для знакомств «просто посмотреть»67%
  5. виртуальный с_кс79%
  6. поцелуи80%
  7. скрытая финансовая помощь другому51%
  8. постоянное обсуждение семейных проблем с другими49%
  9. только сам с_екс56%

The shares total 606%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTCAnonymous Poll226 voters

Как считаете, кому изменяют чаще всего?

  1. Тем, кто некрасиво стареет5%
  2. Полным7%
  3. Молодым мамам16%
  4. Жадным, скупым на добрые слова46%
  5. В измене виноват изменивший, второй тут не при чем34%
  6. Поделюсь в комментариях своим мнением8%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Otche.pro
@otchepro0 · 21,664
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
Что-то личное
@chto_to_li4noe · 27,885
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Духовный дневник с журналом «Фома»
@foma_ru_voprosy · 35,079
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТВОИ КРЫЛЬЯ | ПСИХОЛОГИ ОНЛАЙН” (@rckrylia), 15,164 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rckrylia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.