Channel
@rcscc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
271subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001851366426 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rcscc |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rcscc |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 271 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 270 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 273 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 275 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 275 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
57 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 16 | 28.1% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 15.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 12.3% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 7.02% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 7.02% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Птички нащебетали, что РСТЦ окончательно нашёл свою рыночную нишу. 🚫Нет, не защищать торговые центры. 🚫Нет, не лоббировать отрасль. 🚫Нет, не объяснять государству, почему офлайн-ритейл дохнет под налогами, маркетплейсами и падающим трафиком. Всё гораздо практичнее. РСТЦ теперь, похоже, большая рекламная доска: клининг купите, ИТ-сервис купите, ИИ-советника купите, страховочку купите, аналитику купите, партнёрство …
😱3🤯1
Союз Тварей инфоЦыган?
Свежие новости. Мошенник Булат Шакиров наебывает всех подряд! Люди сделали по заказу макет его фейкового острова в Черном море. Но Булат Шакиров, как обычно, кинул на деньги! К сожалению, еще не все знают, что он умеет, сука, втереться в доверие. А всем лохам советую сначала прогуглить кто такой Булат Шакиров. Держитесь от этой инфоцыганской твари подальше! Пострадавшие пишите на почту: [email protected]…
Кажется мы нашли идеального президента. Если за, то ставьте 👍🏻
👍6❤1💩1🤣1😁1🆒1
СТЦ изгоняет членов из своих рядов
😁2🤮1
Великий башкирский учитель и президент СТЦ РБК Шакиров не хочет отдавать деньги вице-президенту СТЦ Ковалеву
😁2
Мне кажется, он у меня вёл право в 9 классе очень непродолжительное время. Я помню это лицо и помню имя. Но тут пишут про Башкирию, а я жила в Казани
Шакиров позорит великий Башкирский народ своим поведением, этот пес должен рассчитаться с теми кому он должен немедленно!
Булат Шакиров - профессиональный мошенник, аферист и инфоцыган. Представляется типа президентом типа Союза торговых центров России, Белоруссии и Казахстана, левой конторки. Сейчас идут его многочисленные банкротства. Он все еще продает квартиры и офисы на несуществующем острове в Черном море. Всем рассказывает какой он офигенный владелец торговых центров.. Перекидал огромное количество людей! Надеюсь закончит свою …
🤮1😁1😱1
Ну что, девочки, у нас новая мысль года от РСТЦ. Оказывается, торговые центры теперь «уже не совсем торговые центры». потрясающе. наконец-то кто-то смог сформулировать то, что рынок чувствовал давно. Это вроде ТЦ, но уже немного спортклуб, немного кружок макраме, немного детская секция, немного коворкинг, а иногда просто большое здание с налогом как у нормального бизнеса. И ведь формально мысль не без смысла. налог…
😁2🤣1
🎉 Сегодня мы поздравляем с днём рождения человека, благодаря которому СТЦ обрели новую жизнь. Это Андрей Аркадьевич , вице президент СТЦ Желаем Андрею Аркадьевичу крепкого здоровья, душевных сил, вдохновения и осуществления самых смелых замыслов!
💩1🔥1🤝1
Кто из них достоин возглавить отрасль?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎2🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rcscc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто из них достоин возглавить отрасль?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Российский Совет Торговых Центров РСТЦ” (@rcscc), 271 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rcscc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.