Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Re:2D

Channel

Re:2D

@re_2d

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,936subscribers

+1,392 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001761404198
TypeChannel
Username@re_2d
Created15 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 October 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/re_2d

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,51029,93629,2236 August 2026 — 28,544 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,542 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,554 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,547 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,538 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,520 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,510 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,518 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,514 subscribers15 August 2026 — 28,585 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,564 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,560 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,561 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,566 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,577 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,595 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,587 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,583 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,564 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,568 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,558 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,549 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,545 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,533 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,524 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,557 subscribers6 September 2026 — 28,562 subscribers9 September 2026 — 28,568 subscribers11 September 2026 — 29,245 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,522 subscribers15 September 2026 — 29,604 subscribers17 September 2026 — 29,619 subscribers27 September 2026 — 29,526 subscribers4 October 2026 — 29,458 subscribers9 October 2026 — 29,536 subscribers13 October 2026 — 29,850 subscribers14 October 2026 — 29,886 subscribers15 October 2026 — 29,900 subscribers16 October 2026 — 29,921 subscribers17 October 2026 — 29,917 subscribers18 October 2026 — 29,936 subscribers6 August 202618 October 2026
41 measurements spanning 74 days, net +1,392. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,296–30,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 19:0029,936+19
17 Oct 2026, 20:2029,917-4
16 Oct 2026, 20:2729,921+21
15 Oct 2026, 16:5529,900+14
14 Oct 2026, 16:3929,886+36
13 Oct 2026, 10:3729,850+314
9 Oct 2026, 09:1429,536+78
4 Oct 2026, 21:1729,458-68
27 Sept 2026, 12:1629,526-93
17 Sept 2026, 18:2129,619+15
15 Sept 2026, 12:5829,604+82
13 Sept 2026, 18:1529,522+277
11 Sept 2026, 21:5629,245+677
9 Sept 2026, 09:2228,568+6
6 Sept 2026, 02:0028,562+5
3 Sept 2026, 21:3628,557+33
2 Sept 2026, 10:5828,524-9
31 Aug 2026, 14:4628,533-12
30 Aug 2026, 13:5328,545-4
29 Aug 2026, 11:1628,549first reading

Engagement

429 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 29,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,250
199 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
205
of 429 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held429 (4 August 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total1,840,030
Reactions total90,466
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Oct 2026, 15:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27m 40s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

186,535 reactions across 405 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤68,27236.6%
custom 519506273322930156522,89912.3%
❤‍🔥19,90710.7%
custom 584799539112286957718,5299.93%
🔥14,4347.74%
💅7,9384.26%
custom 58461973803738107117,8094.19%
custom 53796042623240381917,2713.90%
😱3,4601.85%
😢3,1311.68%
💋2,4341.30%
😁2,2751.22%
🥰2,2061.18%
custom 51950121556944214151,9651.05%
👍1,6980.91%
🤔1,2660.679%
🤯6800.365%
🗿2800.15%
👎810.043%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 419 of the 429 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193,067 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 429 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3,902
across the posts below
Posts paid on
61
of 419 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1,110
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @re_2d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 429 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 18 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,470 views114 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤90❤‍🔥11🔥10custom 53796042623240381913

18 Oct 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,640 views170 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Всё чаще вижу вырезки из Чиикавы, там есть персонаж ну буквально я

❤144❤‍🔥16🔥10

18 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC≈4,860 views193 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤118custom 519506273322930156542😢31❤‍🔥2

17 Oct 2026, 18:00 UTC≈7,310 views338 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥255🥰48❤29🔥6

17 Oct 2026, 17:27 UTC≈7,660 views533 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Ета вы

❤443custom 537960426232403819153custom 584619738037381071124custom 584799539112286957713

17 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC≈7,950 views541 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Video

Швайгерт зачем-то терроризирует бедного татарина дикпиками 👤 Вулк Боярский

❤392custom 5847995391122869577101😁32custom 519506273322930156516

17 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC≈8,760 views478 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Касым-Жомарт Токаев гордится вами, Товарищ Швайгерт @tylertheblender X @TakoDaVinci 👤 тайлер блендер

❤388🔥48custom 584799539112286957734❤‍🔥8

17 Oct 2026, 05:27 UTC≈8,970 views689 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

🤡

custom 5847995391122869577563custom 519506273322930156589😱26custom 584619738037381071111

16 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC≈9,750 views399 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Это швай блогер местный Ай люблю ТГК мой :3 👤 TAROKAN TOROKANESHE

custom 5847995391122869577321🔥46❤29custom 58461973803738107113

15 Oct 2026, 16:46 UTC≈10,200 views409 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Video

Швагерге барыңыз! Біздің Барыс! @TakoDaVinci 👤 DVD ᠌

❤355🔥31custom 584799539112286957717🥰6

15 Oct 2026, 15:44 UTC≈10,300 views794 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Нисек мин күрәм Швайгертны иртәгә

❤629custom 5379604262324038191113❤‍🔥37🥰15

15 Oct 2026, 15:32 UTC≈10,100 views499 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Алтын күн аспаны, Алтын дән даласы, Ерліктің дастаны, Еліме қарашы! Ежелден ер деген, Даңқымыз шықты ғой. Намысын бермеген, Қазағым мықты ғой! Қайырмасы: Менің елім, менің елім, Гүлің болып егілемін, Жырың болып төгілемін, елім! Туған жерім менің – Қазақстаным! Ұрпаққа жол ашқан, Кең байтақ жерім бар. Бірлігі жарасқан, Тәуелсіз елім бар. Қарсы алған уақытты, Мәңгілік досындай, Біздің ел бақытты, Біздің ел осындай!

❤384custom 519506273322930156592👍20👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 429 posts we hold for @re_2d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@re_2d edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTCAnonymous Poll2,900 voters approx.

Чисто гипотетически, если мы в Soul Chain добавим возможность за 5к купить себе КАСТОМНОГО СОБСТВЕННОГО ПЕРСОНАЖА, вы бы хотели подобного себе?

  1. БЛЯ ДА, Я БЫ ВЗЯЛ27%
  2. Дороговато будет, но подумаю48%
  3. Нононо25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTCAnonymous Poll4,370 voters approx.

А есть ли у Сьюзи из дельтаруны хвостик?

  1. Определённо есть83%
  2. У неё нету хвоста17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTCAnonymous Poll3,840 voters approx.

Знаете что? Нам надо собрать стату

  1. ДА👍70%
  2. Не👎30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 429 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FeelBro
@FeeelBro · 49,399
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Мудреныч
@moodrenych · 25,368
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Igrarium Team
@igrarium_official · 59,390
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Майзенберг
@meizzenberg · 41,820
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Лысеющее любби Грустного Пакета
@sadbagg · 52,202
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
MysteryForce
@MysteryChtoto · 61,373
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Re:2D” (@re_2d), 29,936 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/re_2d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.