Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Читацька штольня📖

Channel

Читацька штольня📖

@readingadit

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,491subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002167751971
TypeChannel
Username@readingadit
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/readingadit

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4021,4911,446.59 August 2026 — 1,403 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,402 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,402 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,450 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,442 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,439 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,491 subscribers9 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 39 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,389–1,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:591,491+52
9 Sept 2026, 03:161,439-3
4 Sept 2026, 01:151,442-8
31 Aug 2026, 13:131,450+8
28 Aug 2026, 06:281,442+29
25 Aug 2026, 05:071,413+11
19 Aug 2026, 08:561,402-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:481,406+4
9 Aug 2026, 18:221,402-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:461,403first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12943.1%
😁8026.8%
🔥7625.4%
👍124.01%
custom 544281100250671649320.669%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @readingadit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC139 views39 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

На добраніч, мамо Со Міе Видавництво: Анетта Антоненко🌟 Про книгу: Кримінальна психологиня Лі Сонґьон проводить інтерв’ю із серійним убивцею та водночас намагається зрозуміти свою падчерку Хайон. Чим глибше вона занурюється в їхні історії, тим виразніше бачить моторошний зв’язок між ними. «На добраніч, мамо» - історія про сім’ю, материнську любов і те, чи народжуються вбивцями, чи ними стають. Враження: Це не

🔥2015👍4

7 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC216 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Господі, це ж уже у вересні(23-го) на Amazon виходить екранізація «Гіпотези кохання»🙂 ЧАС ЛЕТИТЬ!!!! Я ще ніби вчора бачив новину, що її тільки збираються екранізувати, а тут уже скоро дивитися будемо☀️ А ви читали книгу? Будете дивитися екранізацію?

18🔥5

7 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC243 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну шо, знову прийшла ваша черга вирішувати👀 З якого відгуку завтра почнеться ваш ранок? ❤️ — «Надобраніч, мамо» 🔥 — «Лист ненародженій дитині»

25🔥8

7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC242 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Як думаєте: вбивцями народжуються чи стають? 🔪 Після «На добраніч, мамо» я вже не впевнений, що відповідь така очевидна…. (І так… корейські трилери потроху займають місце в моєму сердечку❤️)

22

7 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC254 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ну шо вам сказати…😅 Вчора вночі сів читати. Знову з думкою - Ну все, цього разу точно дочитаю. І шо ви думаєте?🤔 До якої сторінки я дочитав?👀 Відповідь уже чекає в коментарях. Але Спочатку спробуйте вгадати😂

😁153

6 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC269 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ситуація - навмисно не придумаєш🤣 Короче, кожен раз, поки вигулюю собак, мене посіщають дуже хороші мислі Типу: «От прийду додому і 100% не ляжу спать, поки не дочитаю книгу» 💪 Ага… да….. Прийшов домой, взяв книгу в руки… Пройшло хвилин 5 Я: 😴😴😴 Мдааа… Геракл уже не той. І подвиги - не ті🤣📚

😁36👍2

6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC258 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁29🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC276 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

24🔥12👍6custom 54428110025067164932

6 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC269 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Щас буде Перша розпаківка місяця від видавництва «Віхола»🌟

17🔥8

6 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC339 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Не Авророю єдиною Готові штурмувати Ашан? Книги по 250грн👀 (Київ - Лавіна мол)

🔥195

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @readingadit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Читацька штольня📖” (@readingadit), 1,491 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/readingadit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.