Channel
@reality_revolt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
128subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002676300071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reality_revolt |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 28 April 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reality_revolt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:07 | 128 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:22 | 128 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
37 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 22 | 59.5% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 16.2% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 10.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2025 to 17 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
These celebrities are programs. Kids grow up with them as harmless Disney faces… then the script switches. The image changes, the clothes disappear, the personality is rewritten. Step by step, they become tools of hypersexualisation, to condition the youth to lose their morals, normalize inversion, and detach from their true identity. Most of them are selected before birth, groomed inside the system, and gender-inver…
👏5❤2
It’s time to start seeing things for what they are, not random disasters, but strategic clean-ups. Every so-called “natural catastrophe” follows the same pattern: destruction, funding, reconstruction, and digital control. Watch my Series realityrevolt.com
👍5
https://t.co/VvDf4qP8aJ
Halloween was never just a celebration. It’s a collective ritual, a moment when the boundary between human and entity fades. Through pop culture, the parasite found a way to inhabit the body: through entertainment, fashion, music, and “fun.” The more fragmented the spirit, the more it seeks to disguise itself. Broken personalities accessorize: masks, filters, symbols, totems Stay centered, trust your intuition, it’s …
👍2
People hate the truth because they’re addicted to division. But the control has always been at the top, that never changes. The real agenda isn’t left vs right, it’s transhumanism. Every event points the same way: toward AI, total surveillance, and the takeover of humanity. Watch my Series realityrevolt.com
👍3
Video, posted without a caption
👍1🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2
This is not about saying who’s a man and who’s a woman. That’s missing the point. The real question is: why do we keep seeing the same patterns, generation after generation? Yes, a woman can naturally have masculine traits, and a man can appear softer. But here we’re looking at something else entirely, something systemic. These people are not random. They are selected, modified, and presented to the public as part of…
👍1🔥1
These are ancient rituals, dating back to figures like Ishtar; the sacred androgynous goddess, worshipped through sexual rites, cross-dressing priests, and public inversion ceremonies. Today, they are repackaged through pop culture, to push the youth to imitate the same inversion. Watch my documentary Series realityrevolt.com
❤1
Movies are tools of psychological conditioning. Through carefully crafted scripts, they guide you to identify with broken, dissociated characters. Step by step, they erase your original sense of self and replace it with an identity they’ve designed for you, one shaped by trauma, fantasy, and submission to external authority. You don’t just watch the hero’s journey, you absorb it. You feel their pain, internalize thei…
👍1
Everything is accelerating. We’re caught in a thick cloud of noise, fear, and confusion. But don’t forget: none of this is random. Everything is anticipated, scripted, and ritualized. What seems chaotic is actually controlled. Yes, it’s horrifying. But it’s all part of a design. Stay sharp. Stay grounded. The worst mistake would be to believe it’s spontaneous. Watch my Series dimitrilegrand.com
❤2👍2
Smartwatches, biometric pills, AI diagnostics, they’re building a system to track you, control you, and decide what goes into your body. The goal isn’t protection. It’s compliance and slow extermination. COVID was just the beta test. An experiment to study our reactions and install global legal frameworks. Now that the Pandemic Agreement is signed, the next phase can begin. Another virus. Another crisis. But this ti…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reality_revolt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dimitri Legrand” (@reality_revolt), 128 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reality_revolt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.