Guess where we’re at :)
❤45👍14🔥3

Channel
@realjoeyyap
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,700subscribers
-825 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001421114784 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realjoeyyap |
| Description | The official channel for JOEY YAP. Start here: https://joeyyap.link/tribemembersonly |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realjoeyyap |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 59,700 | -47 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 59,747 | -22 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 59,769 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 59,783 | -34 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 59,817 | -77 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 59,894 | -56 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 59,950 | -30 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:55 | 59,980 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:28 | 60,003 | -21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:27 | 60,024 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 60,046 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 60,064 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 60,081 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 60,096 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 60,117 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 60,139 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 60,155 | -29 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 60,184 | -49 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 60,233 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 60,258 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (9 July 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 133,750 |
| Reactions total | 1,020 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,980 reactions across 49 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,064 | 69.3% | |
| 👍 | 591 | 19.8% | |
| 🔥 | 130 | 4.36% | |
| 🎉 | 113 | 3.79% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 1.07% | |
| 🤩 | 22 | 0.738% | |
| 🙏 | 20 | 0.671% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 0.268% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,980 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Guess where we’re at :)
❤45👍14🔥3
Hey Tribe! I’m in China at the moment chairing the BaZi Full Circle Meeting. But this is about something else. I’ve wanted to do this for quite some time. Because many of you have watched me use QiMen for years... You’ve seen the charts.The boxes. The forecasts. The stars, doors and deities. And perhaps quietly thought… “I would like to understand this. But preferably without needing a second lifetime.” Fair. So…
❤54👍15🔥1
Just posted, read it here
❤38👍9🔥3
The Feng Shui Summit in Singapore turned out something we didn't fully expect. Students who'd been through Joey's programs for years told us this is the best learning experience they've ever had. So we're brining it to Kuala Lumpur. The Feng Shui Summit Encore 3, 4, and 5 October 2026 Live and in person with Joey Yap Across three days, Joey walks you through how to actually read a home. ✅ Which areas of your hom…
❤27👍7
Photo, posted without a caption
Something different is happening. For the first time since 2019, Joey's teaching FSA live, in person, outside Asia. Two cities, small rooms, and you're hearing first. Six years online got real reach, one session alone pulled in 24,000 people at once. But something about the room never made it through the screen. Then came the Blood Goat year, heavy enough that Joey decided this one had to happen live. London, Oct …
❤25👍12
Most people who look at their BaZi want to know one thing. “What is going to happen to me?” Fair question. I understand why we ask it. But lately, I’ve been thinking that maybe there’s a more useful question. “Who will I become when it happens?” Because an opportunity can come and we still miss it. Pressure can make us sharper. Or make us do something stupid. A new relationship can begin, but sometimes we brin…
❤39👍11🔥5
Hey tribe! Undoubtedly one of the top questions I’m asked, even today. My gut tells me if your circle of friends knew you take my courses of have been to my events, you get asked the same question as well 😂 Read the full article, then subscribe. Posting weekly there —> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/good-year-wrong-starting-point-joey-yap-yq4xc
👍23❤13🎉4🔥1
Hey tribe! Read the full article here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-get-feng-shui-built-around-your-goals-gurunathan-govindan-ydu2c/ As most of you know, Guru's 'Employee 001' in my team and we go way back. If you're coming to the Feng Shui Summit this weekend, make sure to catch him speak at a breakout session. If you're building a home, are in the property development industry or commercial real estate, it…
❤39👍8🔥4
Wow. What an incredible honour. I am truly humbled and deeply grateful to receive the Darjah Cemerlang Seri Melaka (D.C.S.M.), carrying the title Datuk Wira, conferred by His Excellency Tun Seri Setia Dr. Haji Mohd Ali bin Mohd Rustam, Yang di-Pertua Negeri Melaka. For my friends and students overseas, the D.C.S.M. is a Melaka state honour carrying the title Datuk Wira, commonly described in English as the rank of …
❤385🎉91👍61🔥9🙏7🤩3
✨ See you guys this weekend! Many of the questions you asked during our recent Life Force Energy training showed me what you’re most concerned about right now. The real challenges you’re facing. The answers you need. And where you want to go deeper. I took all of that into account when shaping this agenda. Over three days, we’ll move from understanding what Feng Shui really does to applying it to your home, career,…
❤25👍5🎉3😁1
Read the full article here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cost-being-cleverest-room-joey-yap-iivic
👍14❤12🔥3🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @realjoeyyap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Joey Yap” (@realjoeyyap), 59,700 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realjoeyyap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.