Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Реальные отзывы | PRO.FINANSY

Channel

Реальные отзывы | PRO.FINANSY

@realprofinansy

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,359subscribers

-137 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001331396362
TypeChannel
Username@realprofinansy
DescriptionВ этом канале заботливо собраны отзывы слушателей, учеников и выпускников pro.finansy. Все отзывы написаны реальными людьми!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 November 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/realprofinansy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

36.8 average views per post against 7,359 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.499%. Across the 9,402 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,219–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 7.26% and 25.9%, with a median of 14.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (4 October 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Posts measured20 of 20 published in the window (20 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled735
Mature posts only0.536% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers7,359 measured 1 November 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 9,402 channels · p10 3.61% · p25 7.26% · p50 14.1% · p75 25.9% · p90 42.2%
Position in cohort0.808th percentile · 1/29 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.039% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 3 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,3597,4967,427.57 August 2026 — 7,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,495 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,488 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,485 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,483 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,481 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,479 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,475 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,467 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,462 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,458 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,448 subscribers2 October 2026 — 7,412 subscribers8 October 2026 — 7,400 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,396 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,391 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,382 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,374 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,371 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,359 subscribers7 August 20261 November 2026
20 measurements spanning 85 days, net -137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,338–7,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Nov 2026, 02:477,359-12
28 Oct 2026, 20:407,371-3
25 Oct 2026, 20:077,374-8
19 Oct 2026, 18:187,382-9
17 Oct 2026, 04:487,391-5
13 Oct 2026, 22:207,396-4
8 Oct 2026, 10:027,400-12
2 Oct 2026, 00:407,412-36
12 Sept 2026, 20:407,448-10
9 Sept 2026, 05:397,458-4
3 Sept 2026, 23:427,462-5
31 Aug 2026, 07:047,467-8
27 Aug 2026, 22:467,475-4
24 Aug 2026, 14:087,479-2
20 Aug 2026, 21:157,481-2
17 Aug 2026, 23:077,483-2
15 Aug 2026, 03:077,485-3
11 Aug 2026, 20:317,488-7
8 Aug 2026, 13:317,495-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:167,496first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.499%
avg views ÷ 7,359 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held44 (26 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total735
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,040
Videos
≈236
Links
≈92

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 07:12 UTC11 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

я закрыла 2 кредита, кредитку, сейчас остался 1 кредит и накопила 300к ❤️

2 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC14 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Очень вам благодарна.в ноябре 21года прошла обучение 🔥

30 Oct 2026, 06:27 UTC42 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

ВБ и озон благодаря вам не так интересны, как бс и иис! ❤️

29 Oct 2026, 05:58 UTC41 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Очень благодарна за подробные инструкции! ❤️

27 Oct 2026, 06:13 UTC35 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Во время программы «Инвестиции доступны всем» Спасибо за то, что вы делаете! ❤️

26 Oct 2026, 14:51 UTC34 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Во время программы «Инвестиции доступны всем» Спасибо, отличная программа, полностью пересмотрела свое отношение к тратам и появился азарт и интерес к инвестициям, спасибо большое! 🔥

26 Oct 2026, 07:09 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Во время программы «Инвестиции доступны всем» Благодарю за курс, появился интерес и азарт, зарабатывать на инвестициях ❤️

❤1

25 Oct 2026, 14:16 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Во время программы «Инвестиции доступны всем» понимаешь - вот он путь, а до этого все по наитию 🔥

❤1

24 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

огромная благодарность семье Гогаладзе за просвещения в инвестициях! 🔥

❤1

24 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Большое спасибо, вы и ваша команда МОЛОДЦЫ ❤️

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @realprofinansy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мужской взгляд на деньги | pro.finansy
@investnews_profinansy · 21,450
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 September 2026
Про инвестиции от финконсультантов pro.finansy
@profinansy_ru · 41,104
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
pro.finansy | дети
@pro_finansy_kids · 62,579
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
Финсоветы | pro.finansy
@finhacker_profinansy · 21,080
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
Закон и финансы | pro.finansy
@zf_profinansy · 22,270
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
Куда инвестирует Ольга Гогаладзе | pro.finansy
@alwaysbemoney · 31,117
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
52 недели богатства | pro.finansy
@weeks52wealth · 32,108
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Марафон по финансовой грамотности | pro.finansy
@igra_profinansy · 45,289
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Школа финансовой грамотности | pro.finansy
@invest_profinansy · 36,900
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Ответы от Оли Гогаладзе
@pravda_pro_finansy · 36,274
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
Дивиденды | pro.finansy
@div_profinansy · 74,424
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Академия PRO.FINANSY
@profinansy_academy · 82,590
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
PRO.FINANSY
@profinansy_post · 62,203
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Акции с Ольгой Гогаладзе l pro.finansy
@profinansy_equity · 51,992
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Облигации | pro.finansy
@obligaciipr · 56,849
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Бизнес Стиль
@Businez_style · 43,440
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
Сценарии рынка РФ | Лекция для выпускников pro.finansy
@ipomaniaa · 20,464
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Реальные отзывы | PRO.FINANSY” (@realprofinansy), 7,359 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realprofinansy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.