Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rebeka Riabová

Channel

Rebeka Riabová

@rebeka_riabova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,826subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001987733234
TypeChannel
Username@rebeka_riabova
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rebeka_riabova

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8111,8261,818.524 August 2026 — 1,811 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,811 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,815 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,823 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,822 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,817 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,826 subscribers24 August 202612 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,809–1,828 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 18:171,826+9
9 Sept 2026, 01:381,817-5
3 Sept 2026, 18:021,822-1
31 Aug 2026, 05:231,823+2
28 Aug 2026, 02:331,821+6
25 Aug 2026, 05:071,815+4
24 Aug 2026, 23:301,811no change
24 Aug 2026, 23:151,811first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.9%
avg views ÷ 1,826 subscribers
Avg views / post
984
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held19 (29 November 202524 August 2026)
Views total984
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 19s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,033 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯92430.5%
👌62220.5%
💊47415.6%
👏37112.2%
😡2869.43%
2417.95%
🕊351.15%
😢290.956%
😈140.462%
😎130.429%
🔥90.297%
🍾50.165%
💋50.165%
🤔40.132%
10.033%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,033 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2025 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC984 views55 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

AJ PRE TAKÉTO ZÁSAHY DO KAMPANE ŽIADAM POSILNENIE KOMPETENCIÍ MEDIÁLNEJ RADY Slovenské médiá majú dlhodobo status najnedôveryhodnejších médií vo svete (81% Slovákov im neverí). Už aj lokálne médiá sa zneužívajú otvorene na špinenie nepohodlných názorov. Zástupca šéfredaktora košického lokálneho média Naše Košice, ktorý o lokálnom poslancovi klamal dvakrát v nadpise svojho článku, na plné ústa povedal, že ľudia s pr

👌32💯2111

18 Jul 2026, 22:23 UTC≈2,180 views130 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

ANI ORWELL BY NEVERIL, ŽE TOTO JE SKUTOČNOSŤ 🆘️ Herečka Tormová s nadšením predstavila progresívnu dúhovú klávesnicu, nad ktorou jasá, nakoľko užívateľovi jednoducho neumožní napísať veľké množstvo slov. Napríklad po zadaní písmen "buze" klávesnica automaticky vyprodukuje namiesto týchto písmen tri dúhy a jednorožca a pôvodné písmená zmaže tak, aby vám neumožnila dokončiť vašu myšlienku. Orwell v jeho diele 1984 po

💯101😢17👌7🔥5

8 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,800 views103 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @oskarrozsaofficialPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👌60👏24💯16😎3

5 Jul 2026, 20:59 UTC≈2,940 views130 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

PRE NÁS "NEPOHODLNÝCH" UŽ IDÚ SPISOVAŤ AJ NEKROLÓGY K vytvoreniu "zoznamu nepohodlných" sa priznala stránka Národné menu. Najnovšie sa jej autori verejne pochválili, že nám na tejto stránke (ktorí sme tam na zozname) budú písať nekrológy. Takže zrejme som mala pravdu, že ich vzorom je ukrajinský Myrotvorets, kde sa zbierajú údaje o ľuďoch, ktorých plánujú zavraždiť. DOKEDY SI TOTO NECHÁME? DOKEDY BUDE TÁTO STRÁNK

😡106💊18👏4😢2

4 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈4,220 views169 reactionsread 24 August 2026

ZOZNAM "NEPOHODLNÝCH" 👻 Ocitla som sa spolu s ďalšími 137 osobami (medzi ktorými sú napríklad premiér, rôzni ministri, politici, funkcionári, komentátori atď.) v databáze "nepohodlných ľudí" (odkaz na ňu pridávam do komentára). Neodsúdil ma súd. Nevyšetruje ma polícia. Nepácham trestné činy. Stačí, že niekomu prekážajú moje názory, ako aj názory ďalších ľudí z tejto databázy. Totiž, pred pár dňami vznikla stránka

💯133😡2410👌2

8 May 2026, 16:51 UTC≈2,880 views200 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

TAKTO DNES V CENTRE KOŠÍC ÚRADUJÚ PROGRESÍVCI 💊🤮 Mesto si akosi zabudlo uctiť dnešný sviatok, namiesto toho nám pripravili takúto zvrátenosť priamo na Hlavnej ulici. Košice si zaslúžia viac než lacné progresívne predstavenie pre pár aktivistov. Túto zvrátenosť podporili EÚ, Mesto Košice, Ministerstvo investícií aj Ministerstvo práce. Nechcem si ani predstaviť, koľko si za to vyfakturujú. °°°°°°°°° Odoberajte Te

💊140😡49😢7🔥4

8 May 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,890 views167 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

SLOBODA NEPRIŠLA SAMA. NIEKTO ZA ŇU BOJOVAL, NIEKTO ZA ŇU ZOMREL. Česť tým, ktorí porazili fašizmus. A zodpovednosť nám, aby sa už nikdy nevrátil. Nezabúdame 🕊❤️

120🕊35💯9💋3

26 Apr 2026, 19:00 UTC≈3,650 views113 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Z ROZHOVORU KORZÁRU S ODVOLANOU RIADITEĽKOU KOŠICKEJ KNIŽNICE 🤡 Citujem: "Problém nastal aj vtedy, keď obidvaja Riabovci prišli do knižnice a požičali si knihu Protokoly sionských mudrcov. Potom to ukazovali na sociálnych sieťach - že „pozrite sa, Bombic je vo väzení za túto knižku a tu si ju knižnica šíri ako chce". Knižnica knihy požičiava, nešíri ich po internete a neporušuje autorský zákon. Knihy nakupuje aj n

💊93👏8😈7👌5

24 Mar 2026, 17:01 UTC≈3,410 views137 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @lukasmachalaPhoto

ĎAKUJEM ZA REKLAMU… Keď vediem zasadnutie rady Slovenskej televízie a rozhlasu, poviete svoj názor a vyzvete DenníkN a ďalšie červené denníčky, aby to zverejnili… a oni mi v priebehu pol hodiny urobia ďalšiu neplatenú reklamu. Ďakujem srdečne, slečna Lodová 👌… pridajte sa: https://t.me/lukasmachala

💯82👏4010😎5

23 Mar 2026, 19:53 UTC≈3,310 views147 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

BANKA ALEBO POLITICKÁ STRANA? V SLSP SA ASI POMÝLILI ❌️ ​Slovenská sporiteľňa sa opakovane mieša do ideologických a spoločenských sporov, namiesto toho, aby sa držala svojej úlohy poskytovania úverov a prijímania vkladov. ​Nielenže finančne podporuje jednostranne ideologicky zamerané "projekty", ale ešte vyzvala ostatné firmy, aby sa pridali. Správa sa skôr ako ideologický aktér než ako finančná inštitúcia. ​Banka

💯111👌1815😡3

17 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC≈4,460 views118 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

EURÓPSKA RADA PRE MEDIÁLNE SLUŽBY VYZVALA KOMISIU, ABY PRESKÚMALA SITUÁCIU NA SLOVENSKU 🤡 No výborne. Ako inak. Takže Komisia má skúmať odvolanie riaditeľa Rady pre mediálne služby, pretože to "môže byť v rozpore s právom EÚ". Kde však boli tieto inštitúcie v rokoch 2022 a 2023, keď existovali vážne podozrenia zo zásahov do volebného procesu? Keď mediálny regulátor pod vedením dnes už odvolaného riaditeľa konal sp

💯93👌158😈2

11 Mar 2026, 20:25 UTC≈2,910 views130 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

ZRODILA SA HVIEZDA 🤡 Počas celého procesu mu nebolo takmer nič rozumieť. Keď si zrovna nemumlal popod nos, tak zase nehovoril do mikrofónu. Rozladil ho znalec. V znaleckom posudku totiž spomenul meno Montesquieuho, ktoré mu bolo do začiatku procesu zdá sa neznáme. Z posudku ho nevedel ani len nahlas prečítať, lebo "to bolo zase po francúzsky". Nevadí. Ide iba o významného právneho filozofa, o ktorom sa na každej f

💯87👌28👏87

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rebeka_riabova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rebeka Riabová” (@rebeka_riabova), 1,826 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebeka_riabova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.