Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rebro

Channel

rebro

@rebro_store_ru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

51,230subscribers

+6,919 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001746238425
TypeChannel
Username@rebro_store_ru
DescriptionМагазин техники Apple, Dyson и других брендов с гарантией 2 года. • Двойная выгода по Трейд-ин • Рассрочка без первого взноса • Подарки при покупке Наш сайт: https://rebro-store.ru Трейд-ин устройства с гарантией 1 год: https://t.me/rebrodiscount
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rebro_store_ru

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

44,26151,23047,745.57 August 2026 — 44,311 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,311 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,315 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,294 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,261 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,265 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,277 subscribers13 August 2026 — 44,282 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,516 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,675 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,529 subscribers18 August 2026 — 47,349 subscribers19 August 2026 — 46,952 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,801 subscribers21 August 2026 — 46,663 subscribers23 August 2026 — 46,538 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,445 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,367 subscribers26 August 2026 — 46,306 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,248 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,187 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,134 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,085 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,043 subscribers1 September 2026 — 45,983 subscribers2 September 2026 — 45,955 subscribers3 September 2026 — 45,912 subscribers5 September 2026 — 45,840 subscribers9 September 2026 — 45,740 subscribers11 September 2026 — 46,959 subscribers13 September 2026 — 47,291 subscribers15 September 2026 — 47,441 subscribers16 September 2026 — 47,561 subscribers19 September 2026 — 51,230 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +6,919. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,216–52,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:1851,230+3,669
16 Sept 2026, 20:1847,561+120
15 Sept 2026, 00:5847,441+150
13 Sept 2026, 12:1947,291+332
11 Sept 2026, 14:5746,959+1,219
9 Sept 2026, 02:5745,740-100
5 Sept 2026, 18:5545,840-72
3 Sept 2026, 20:0245,912-43
2 Sept 2026, 09:1245,955-28
1 Sept 2026, 11:0445,983-60
31 Aug 2026, 11:4546,043-42
30 Aug 2026, 13:5646,085-49
29 Aug 2026, 13:0546,134-53
28 Aug 2026, 14:0746,187-61
27 Aug 2026, 16:4246,248-58
26 Aug 2026, 16:5446,306-61
25 Aug 2026, 18:3846,367-78
24 Aug 2026, 18:5346,445-93
23 Aug 2026, 03:3646,538-125
21 Aug 2026, 18:0646,663first reading

Engagement

114 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.65%
avg views ÷ 51,230 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 114 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held114 (2 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total150,546
Reactions total1,608
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 15:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,820
Videos
438
Links
587

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 58s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,846 reactions across 111 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥93724.4%
63016.4%
❤‍🔥44111.5%
👀2917.57%
👍2747.12%
🤣1995.17%
🤩1814.71%
💯1393.61%
😁932.42%
custom 5305393940483025545852.21%
🥰731.90%
😭721.87%
🍾641.66%
💘441.14%
😱441.14%
😍431.12%
👏300.78%
🎉290.754%
🤝220.572%
🤪180.468%
18 further kinds1373.56%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,846 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,180 views26 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Внимание ⚠️ Замечен новый сотрудник. Не опаздывает, не просит повысить зарплату, выглядит слишком мило. Не судите строго, это был его первый рабочий день 🤣

14🤣8😁3🥰1

21 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,120 views32 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁17💊7🤪4🥰21🤩1

17 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC≈4,800 views29 reactionsread 22 September 2026

⠀⠀⠀⠀iPhone 17 Pro Max ⠀среди гаджетов с историей? | | 😌😌😌😌😌😳😌😌😌😌😌 😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌 😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌 😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌

💯137🔥3❤‍🔥2👀2🤩1🥰1

17 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈4,310 views18 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Всем нужны низкие цены ⚡️ И они здесь! Пока это возможно. Apple уже подняла их на iPhone, а 17 Pro и 17 Pro Max и вовсе сняла с производства. Пишите «Стоп» → в чат, чтобы зафиксировать цену 🔗

🔥115🤩1🥰1

16 Sept 2026, 07:09 UTC≈4,640 views44 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Т-банк снова в App Store ⚡️ На этот раз его замаскировали под книгу рецептов → Craftersy. Качайте сами и отправляйте близким! Вам скажут спасибо. «🔥» — за изобретательность.

🔥33👍32💘2🤩2🥰2

15 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC≈3,950 views19 reactionsread 22 September 2026

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 iPhone с историей: iPhone 16 Pro 256 ГБ | Пустынный Титан — от 69 990₽ iPhone 15 Pro 128 ГБ | Натуральный Титан — от 47 990₽ iPhone 14 Pro Max 256 ГБ | Золотой — от 47 990₽ iPhone 13 128 ГБ | Зелёный — от 23 990₽ iPhone 12 128 ГБ | Чёрный — от 19 990₽

11❤‍🔥4🤩2🥰2

14 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC≈4,000 views25 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Проверим, есть ли у вас особое чутьё? 👀 Попробуйте угадать, в какой из карточек спрятана ваша выгода на iPhone 17 Pro Max. Воспользоваться ей, пока есть, можно в чате → @rebro_manager. Или сразу на 2-й Юго-Западной, 7.

❤‍🔥14🤩6🥰3👍2

14 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC≈3,990 views31 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Кхм... А вы ничего не забыли? Например, нажать «Участвовать» и выиграть iPhone Duo 🤨

🔥16❤‍🔥9👍6

11 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC≈5,110 views43 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Осторожно, мошенники ⚠️ Хотим напомнить, что единственный аккаунт, через который мы связываемся с вами, называется @rebro_manager. Если вам пишет профиль с ником, похожим на наш, и просит заполнить личные данные или оплатить заказ по ссылке, не продолжайте диалог!

❤‍🔥19👍97🔥6💘2

10 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC≈5,950 views29 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Цены на iPhone 17 Pro взлетели сразу после презентации Apple. iPhone 17 Pro и Pro Max резко подорожали на фоне остановки производства и высокой стартовой цены нового поколения. Спрос на прошлогодние Pro-модели сейчас будет расти каждый день. Сегодня iPhone 17 Pro ещё можно купить от 107 990 ₽. Что будет с ценой завтра — никто не знает.

👻12😱9👀8

9 Sept 2026, 18:57 UTC≈11,700 views327 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Дарим первый складной iPhone Duo🔥 Вы ждали! И мы ждали! Первыми в Казани разыгрываем главную новинку в линейке Apple — cкладной iPhone Duo. Чтобы получить его, нужно подписаться на все каналы: — Enter — rebro — В Татарстане Поймут — ТатарстанДа! Нажимайте «Участвовать» и просто ожидайте итогов. Победителя мы объявим 1 октября с помощью рандомайзера! Важно: приз необходимо будет забрать лично по адресу г. Казань у

169🔥81🍾44💘25🤩4👀2👍2

9 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC≈4,100 views44 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Первая презентация Джона Тернуса — всё! Разоряемся через… Или нет. Ведь мы подарим iPhone Duo кому-то из вас 😛

👏27💅9❤‍🔥3😍3🤩1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @rebro_store_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rebro_store_ru edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Sept 2026, 08:28 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

Что хотите узнать больше всего?

  1. Будет ли база – iPhone 1848%
  2. Что изменится в Pro-версии42%
  3. Чем удивит iPhone Ultra42%
  4. Что добавят в AirPods 527%
  5. Улучшат ли Apple Watch15%

The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz404 voters

Финал: кто угадает?

  1. iPhone 14 Pro15%
  2. iPhone 15 Pro Max48%
  3. iPhone 17 Pro37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz309 voters

Здесь уже посложнее…

  1. iPhone 1747%
  2. iPhone 15 Pro Max46%
  3. iPhone 138%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz291 voters

Тут всё очевидно! Или нет? 🤔

  1. iPhone 1722%
  2. iPhone 15 Pro Max25%
  3. iPhone 1353%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz203 voters

Ну и напоследок! Заабузить — это…

  1. Обмануть продавца14%
  2. Собрать всю выгоду: купить со скидкой и подарком67%
  3. Обидеть друга18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz240 voters

Тапать — это…

  1. Учить уроки3%
  2. Быстро кликать по экрану95%
  3. Делать зарядку0%
  4. Долго спать2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rebro” (@rebro_store_ru), 51,230 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebro_store_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.