Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Red Games

Channel

Red Games

@red_channel_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

623subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001531054938
TypeChannel
Username@red_channel_official
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/red_channel_official

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6216236227 August 2026 — 623 subscribers8 August 2026 — 623 subscribers15 August 2026 — 622 subscribers22 August 2026 — 621 subscribers16 September 2026 — 623 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 621–623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 04:19623+2
22 Aug 2026, 21:34621-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:05622-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:01623no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:12623first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 17 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4826.1%
💯2714.7%
🤯2312.5%
😱2212.0%
custom 5204334403685195073137.07%
😁94.89%
🤣52.72%
🥴52.72%
😍42.17%
custom 546546519405652561931.63%
😢31.63%
😭31.63%
🤔31.63%
🤩31.63%
custom 520432505783635887621.09%
❤‍🔥21.09%
🌚21.09%
👍21.09%
🤨21.09%
💊10.543%
2 further kinds21.09%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 17 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @red_channel_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC132 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥5💯3🤯2

30 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC231 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, игра, на удивление, годная (если играть в неё с видом от третьего лица)

🔥6😍4custom 52043344036851950733

17 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC394 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Господа, отмечайте сегодняшний день как ❗️НЕПЛОХОЙ❗️ Bethesda официально в своей 📱синей птице объявила, что ведётся работа, загибайте пальцы, над: 🛑TES VI 🛑Fallout 3 Remaster 🛑Fallout: NV Remaster 🛑Fallout 5 🛑Ну и чёт промычали про кривую поделку TESO Всё, конечно же, без даты выхода. Но известно, что работать Fallout 5 и TES VI будут на Creation Engine 3 (выдыхаем, никакого UE, моды будут) 💬Чат и общение #bethes…

🔥3custom 54654651940565256193😱2😁1

13 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC369 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @yuckycartsPhoto

🎙 Новый выпуск подкаста! «Невкусные картриджи» вновь погружаются в индустрию локализации! На сей раз Виталя и Андрей с канала «ВКрасном» оказались по ту сторону микрофона и уселись в режиссёрское кресло. А чтобы понять специфику работы, ребята пригласили Анастасию Бирюкову — режиссёра дубляжа The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild, Tears of the Kingdom и других игр. В этом выпуске вы узнаете всё о режиссуре, в том…

🔥3😱3custom 52043344036851950732

7 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC371 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, свистать всех наверх🏴‍☠️

🔥6😱3custom 52043344036851950733🤷‍♂1

6 Jul 2026, 06:29 UTC373 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

А мы как-то будем комментировать тот факт, что, оказывается, WhatsApp* без трёх букв работает? Это когда такое началось? И почему нигде не было новостей об этом? А чё тогда люди до сих пор обоссышем Максимкой пользуются? *Компания Meta признана экстремистской на территории РФ

🔥4🤯4😱2

30 Jun 2026, 15:24 UTC492 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥Я не понимаю, как такое возможно, но… ИГРА БУДЕТ ФУЛЛ НА КАРТРИДЖЕ🔥🔥🔥 11 августа вновь отправляемся покорять Сиродил

🔥9🤯3custom 52043250578363588762

29 Jun 2026, 11:44 UTC433 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#оффтоп Наглость – второе счастье Пост, конечно, больше будет похож на хвастовство (с другой стороны – а почему нет?), но рассказ мой о действительно грустном В связи с долбанутой ситуацией (не буду говорить где и почему), плюс бум ИИ, цены на технику везде растут, но где рост особенно велик – в необъятной. Плюс какие-то там запреты всего и вся, не ровен час, как запретят серый рынок с концами, а вместе с ним и люб…

🤯6🥴4😱4

25 Jun 2026, 13:44 UTC388 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Apple, молодцы, конечно. Осталось ещё выпилить обосанную Я.Музыку из App Store и люди хоть узнают, что есть нормальная музыка, да ещё и без ЗАПИКИВАНИЙ, а не всякая дичь в лице наших исполнителей

💯7custom 52043344036851950733🔥2💊1🥴1

23 Jun 2026, 07:32 UTC420 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не думал, что настанет день, когда старая игра в портативном режиме на Switch 2 будет выглядеть красивее любой современной мультиплатформы Речь идёт о Rise of the Tomb Rider. Но прежде чем в неё поиграть, игру нужно купить и с этим мне помог Роман, который занимается продажей карт оплаты по смешным ценам; от всей души рекомендую приобретать карты у него, если не хотите переплачивать на других площадках. Уже далеко н…

🔥4😱3custom 52043344036851950732

17 Jun 2026, 11:27 UTC469 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чего я и боялся. Если это будет та же игра с UE графикой, то это сумасшедший провал, даже Зельда про Зельду на фоне этого не будет казаться столь скучной

💯4🤯3😢3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @red_channel_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Red Games” (@red_channel_official), 623 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/red_channel_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.