Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 革命马列毛维基 RMLM Wiki

Channel

革命马列毛维基 RMLM Wiki

@redleftwiki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

90subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004482996711
TypeChannel
Username@redleftwiki
Created23 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/redleftwiki

Growth

7090807 August 2026 — 70 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70 subscribers15 August 2026 — 76 subscribers21 August 2026 — 84 subscribers27 August 2026 — 85 subscribers4 September 2026 — 88 subscribers12 September 2026 — 90 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–93 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 16:5690+2
4 Sept 2026, 00:5988+3
27 Aug 2026, 13:3285+1
21 Aug 2026, 14:0884+8
15 Aug 2026, 03:1476+6
9 Aug 2026, 23:4770no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:0370first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎3337.9%
👍2933.3%
1314.9%
💩55.75%
🤡44.60%
😢22.30%
🤩11.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

维基是否应该尊重著作权?

  1. 41%
  2. 63%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👎2👍1

Signed Albert Julie JA

1 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Contents/zh 可参考这个帮助页面进行编辑

👎2👍1

Signed Albert Julie JA

29 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC543 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

一封欢迎信 同志们你好!这里是革命马列毛维基项目组,我们现在想要邀请每个人参加到这个人人可编辑的马列毛百科工程上面来。 如果同志们愿意加入到革命马列毛维基的,请注册账号即可。 维基的帮助页可供同志们探讨相关问题。 欢迎你们的加入 维基地址:https://wiki.gongge491001.org

👍7👎4🤡21

27 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC116 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gong_ge_news

公开信 同志们你好!这里是工革报,我们现在想要邀请你们参加【革命马列毛维基】项目组。 这是一个由【工革报】发起的项目。现在项目组的主要参加人员和各种事务暂时还由工革报进行。但是我们认为这不是工革报一个组织的事务,而应该由维基【社群】进行、各组织组成的【项目组】代表领导的项目。 我们希望在立场上和目前现有的资产阶级性质的百科和报刊有所不同,就像1953年之前的苏联大百科全书一样,苏联大百科全书是明确站在无产阶级立场的,以马列主义作为指导来编写的百科全书。 维基项目的【目的】是多面的,而这些目的主要集中在阅读维基所能带来的教育上的裨益,次要的是通过维基编写、以无产阶级的立场、革命的导向、马列毛主义的理论,对各个概念、理论进行阐述、澄清和驳斥,反映马克思列宁毛泽东主义的理论和实践。例如有: - 国史写作,并对自由派的攻击进行反驳 - 政治经济学概念阐述 - 左翼组织介绍 - 安全保卫工作 - 左翼思想动态集中点(如“政治报”和

6👎3

26 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC134 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

维基已经恢复,架构稳定,备份机制已完善

5👎2

25 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC157 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

我们会进行技术上规范的系统搭建框架调整和每日的云盘加密备份,以确保今后不会有删库丢失的数据问题发生

👍6🤡2👎1

Signed 革命左翼维基 燎原之火

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @redleftwiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTCFinal Results32 voters

维基是否应该尊重著作权?

  1. 41%
  2. 63%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jul 2026, 04:24 UTCFinal Results66 voters

维基是否要绝对禁止ai使用?

  1. 48%
  2. 15%
  3. ai 写作,人工审核39%
  4. 其它9%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“革命马列毛维基 RMLM Wiki” (@redleftwiki), 90 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redleftwiki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.