Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Red Pills Infos

Channel

Red Pills Infos

@redpillactus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,504subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001808076560
TypeChannel
Username@redpillactus
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/redpillactus

Growth

3,5043,5193,511.58 August 2026 — 3,519 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,518 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,508 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,505 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,511 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,510 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,513 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,511 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,518 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,504 subscribers8 August 20268 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 32 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,502–3,521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 15:583,504-14
3 Sept 2026, 17:003,518+7
28 Aug 2026, 08:543,511-2
24 Aug 2026, 23:553,513+3
21 Aug 2026, 11:473,510-1
18 Aug 2026, 06:143,511+6
15 Aug 2026, 07:343,505-3
11 Aug 2026, 18:413,508-10
8 Aug 2026, 10:103,518-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:313,519first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 42s
Average length
1m 44s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

723 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25935.8%
22230.7%
🔥7510.4%
👏679.27%
344.70%
🙏253.46%
🕊223.04%
🤨172.35%
🤔20.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 723 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC≈1,120 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/uq7V5j_sOt4?si=ni2qGkCgc1eiUOBc

🕊18👍74

1 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC894 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/1to42gyUVlc?si=4f0bKmbjqUq2ePaA

👍3310

29 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,440 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Comment l'appartenance à un groupe impacte notre individualité ? https://youtu.be/49if9Ai--CE?si=_PKUj535OVDY0RDr

8👍5

29 Jul 2026, 00:30 UTC≈1,450 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7NZg3PRnbGo

🤨173

28 Jul 2026, 20:36 UTC≈1,060 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lecanal_dutemps_dunouveau_mondeVideo

Tout est fréquence. Le son primordial de l'univers désigne la syllabe sacrée OM (ou AUM) dans la tradition spirituelle, et les oscillations acoustiques baryoniques en science. C'est le son à partir duquel l'univers s'est manifesté. Puis il y eut toute une symphonie... Et si l'on est capable de retrouver les symphonies de manifestations, alors on peut faire surgir les formes de l'absence de formes, du champ quanti

27👍131

28 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,300 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/aaWRh1CEiT8?si=p_XsvmsQV9iy8Jg8

🔥10👍8

28 Jul 2026, 01:01 UTC≈1,260 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/zIkhj8ILY_0?si=irE6b6uML5gCWlnp

25👍7

23 Jul 2026, 03:26 UTC≈2,230 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/hczy6vLIv7Y?si=cg0PVZC9dhF-SYlk

👏2385

22 Jul 2026, 02:52 UTC≈1,680 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/dfvGBkB1P-Q?si=Y3gMXSeWmoC2wCD0

👍124

22 Jul 2026, 02:06 UTC≈1,360 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @la_nouvelle_franceVideo

Les tumeurs littéralement liquéfiées par des ondes sonores. Pas de scalpel. Pas de chimio. Pas de radiothérapie. Aucun de ces horribles effets secondaires. Ceci est l’histotripsie : des ultrasons focalisés détruisent mécaniquement les cellules cancéreuses en quelques minutes, épargnant complètement le tissu sain. @la_nouvelle_france

53🙏23🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 03:04 UTC≈1,800 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @actuintelVideo

Le Dr Peter McCullough affirme que le médecin moyen fait preuve d’aveuglement volontaire, car il s’est lui-même fait vacciner et a encouragé les membres de sa famille et ses patients à faire de même. « Il leur est désormais psychologiquement impossible d’admettre en leur for intérieur que cela a été une erreur désastreuse pour leur propre santé, ainsi que pour celle de leur famille et de leurs patients. » https://x.

👏44👍175🕊4

16 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,470 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AileaStick

👇🤫 Un excellent Dr Jean-Marc Sabatier, comme d'habitude. https://youtu.be/n51waNNg22I

👍292

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @redpillactus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

InfoLibre_Actualités
@infolibre_fil_d_actus · 33,111
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Red Pills Infos” (@redpillactus), 3,504 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redpillactus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.