هیچ فضیلتی در رنج بردن وجود نداره، فقط آدمای احمق فکر میکنن فقط با بدبختی کشیدن میشه به جایی رسید.

Channel
ری_را
@ree_gram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,324subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001190248309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ree_gram |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ree_gram |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 7,324 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 7,320 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 7,321 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 7,312 | +31 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 7,281 | -21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 7,302 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 7,305 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 7,310 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 7,311 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 7,312 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 7,312 | first reading |
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.6%
- avg views ÷ 7,324 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,070
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (2 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 41,650 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
باید بپذیری هیچکس قرار نیس دوست داشتنی که تو به خودت نداری و بهت بده، هیچکس قرار نیس امیدی که تو به زندگی نداری و بهت بده، هیچکس قرار نیس خوشحالی که تو باید در زندگیت پیداش کنی و برات پیداش کنه، هیچکس قرار نیس هدفی که نداری و برات بسازه و محققش کنه. و هیچکس قرار نیس والدت بشه و تمام نیازهات رو برطرف کنه. تو فقط خودتی و خودت رو داری، پس قبل از دیگران خودت رو دریاب، چون تا وقتی خودت خلاهاتو پر نکردی، کسی دیگه نمیتونه …
چون تو را در زمین ذوقی بخشید که آسمان را نمیخواهی. _فیه مافیه مولانا
@ree_gram
اقای مهندس عزیز💔 کاش جهان جای بهتری بود برای زیستن ...
در تیرهروز آیا آوازی به کار است؟ آری، آواز تیرهروزان _ برتولت برشت @ree_gram
File, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
در تیرهروز آیا آوازی به کار است؟ آری، آواز تیرهروزان _ برتولت برشت @ree_gram
خفتهای در خاطرهی نوازشهای من خاطرهای به نرمی همان نوازشها تن تو خواب تنت را میبیند خواب میبینی که در کنار من است و من همهی اینها را به خواب میبینم _هرمان دکُنینک @ree_gram
@ree_gram
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @ree_gram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@foroghfarokhzad · 45,069
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@ShamlouHouse · 43,418
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@mrordibeheshti · 38,357
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@foroogh_shamloo · 51,981
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
@textimix · 45,219
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@irTBook · 258,397
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 August 2026
@thepanizgm · 35,591
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@monadchannel · 52,334
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
@narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,772
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ری_را” (@ree_gram), 7,324 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ree_gram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.