Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чёткий Регион

Channel

Чёткий Регион

@region63ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,731subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435347669
TypeChannel
Username@region63ru
Created29 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/region63ru

Growth

1,7041,7311,717.56 August 2026 — 1,704 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,704 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,705 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,707 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,708 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,722 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,724 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,726 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,727 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,729 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,730 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,731 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,700–1,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:161,731+1
1 Sept 2026, 20:531,730+1
29 Aug 2026, 11:231,729+2
26 Aug 2026, 17:451,727+1
23 Aug 2026, 23:451,726+2
20 Aug 2026, 01:571,724+2
16 Aug 2026, 20:451,722+14
13 Aug 2026, 12:271,708+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:321,707+2
6 Aug 2026, 23:351,705+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:331,704no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:231,704first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

147 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5134.7%
🔥2517.0%
😁2215.0%
1912.9%
🙏96.12%
🤣85.44%
👏53.40%
👌32.04%
🤡32.04%
🎉21.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC471 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну это так. Он естественно нифига не разберётся, кто ему дал азаровские слоганы вообще вопрос, но чисто чтобы меня не обвиняли в продажности Мусоро-водочной банде.

👍1

22 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC484 viewsread 7 August 2026

Моя позиция - на выборы в буржуазном государстве ходят, как бы это? Ну скажем так - я лично стараюсь особо не контачить. Но есть ньюансы. Вот почему Максим Гусейнов станет снова депутатом губдумы от старого города? Да потому что он со своей подругой как в одно место ошпаренные носятся по округу с коммунальными проблемами жителей. Да, решить многие из них они не могут, но держат руку на дёргающемся пульсе электората.

19 Jan 2026, 16:40 UTC≈2,100 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пацан сказал, что уходит из телеграмма, пресс-служба пацана сказала, что пацан возвращается в телеграмм. Осуждать не буду, сам не без греха, подожду публикаций "от первого лица". О, уже сам рифмовать начал.

😁17👌3👍2🔥2🎉1🤡1

4 Jan 2026, 07:51 UTC≈2,600 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👆Нет. Ну если у меня на округе такой кандидат будет, то я сделаю исключение и схожу на это сомнительное мероприятие, под названием "голосование"😄

😁5

4 Jan 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,970 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vorontsova63ruVideo

Подписчики развлекаются 😂 СмешноЕ)

🔥51

31 Dec 2025, 20:04 UTC≈2,190 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍9🔥3🎉1

31 Dec 2025, 10:34 UTC≈1,870 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В уходящем году мы капитально забили на канал, конечно не так, как наши эффективные менеджеры забивают на свои обязанности, но мы стремились к этому. Ладно шучу. Объективно просто в этом году не было ни времени, ни возможности, плюс многое пришлось переосмыслить. Буду ли в следующем году на связи - не знаю. Так то выборы впереди, представители древнейшей профессии (народный избранник) будут всякую чушь мочить, Тульск

🔥87👍2

19 Dec 2025, 08:57 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilya_suhih

⚡⚡⚡ Внимание! В связи с утренней атакой вражеских БПЛА на одно из городских предприятий на отдельных территориях г.о. Тольятти стали распространяться недостоверные сведения о возможной подготовке к эвакуации населения. Прошу всех наших жителей руководствоваться только официальной информацией, не доверять слухам. Все оперативные службы находятся на месте. Последствия падения обломков БПЛА ликвидируются в штатном режи

6 Dec 2025, 11:08 UTC≈2,300 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отписался. Не хочу разжигать рознь между собой и среднестатистическим жителем Чёткого 63 Региона, мол я получил подписку бесплатно, а честный Волжанин должен отстегнуть 1649 рубля, ещё походу и каждый месяц. С такими важными, бумажными, нам не по пути.

🤣81👍1

6 Dec 2025, 10:54 UTC≈1,950 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Да да. Мост сделали до 1 декабря, фото я тогда и сделал, но полно дел, поэтому не до телеги было. Славику конечно плюсик, от Пацанов с Революционной, но... Есть одно но появившиеся вчера, мешающее мне признать Тульского как избавление от произвола Димасика. Как-нибудь озвучу это "Но".

1👍1

20 Nov 2025, 14:25 UTC≈1,910 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dmbegunVideo

На Пивкине лица нет… Было: 480К штрафа, который тут же отменили и свобода. Стало: 5 лет срока. Мде… Подробности

🔥7👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @region63ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Воронцова вещает 🦊
@vorontsova63ru · 31,028
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
VOLGA.brief
@volgabrief · 39,232
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
БАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,703
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
63 РЕГИОН
@reg063 · 63,457
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
Злой самаритянин
@zloysamarityanin · 34,617
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
Убежище Самара
@samara · 58,729
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Подслушано Самара🐐
@psamara · 40,514
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
63.RU | НОВОСТИ САМАРЫ | ТОЛЬЯТТИ
@news63ru · 58,997
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
Михаил Матвеев коммент
@matveevkomment · 60,103
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
ИРБ - работаем вместе!
@irb_uik · 40,356
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чёткий Регион” (@region63ru), 1,731 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/region63ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.