Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rekt Daily

Channel

Rekt Daily

@rekttekashi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,143subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001663181378
TypeChannel
Username@rekttekashi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rekttekashi

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1431,1571,1507 August 2026 — 1,157 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,157 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,155 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,150 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,148 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,147 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,144 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,143 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,141–1,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 21:391,143-1
11 Sept 2026, 12:561,144-3
2 Sept 2026, 02:121,147-1
29 Aug 2026, 19:531,148-2
16 Aug 2026, 19:371,150-5
10 Aug 2026, 04:411,155-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:031,157no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:581,157first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14263.7%
🔥177.62%
👏167.17%
👀146.28%
🗿41.79%
🤔41.79%
🥴41.79%
💯31.35%
🤣31.35%
20.897%
🌚20.897%
😁20.897%
😢20.897%
🤝20.897%
🤷‍♂20.897%
🆒10.448%
🌭10.448%
🙈10.448%
🤯10.448%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 14 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2026, 03:15 UTC579 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

this also held. the only thing spooky to me about these charts is the "strength" of the bounce so far in comparison to the previous reactions. I'm still leaning bottom here though.

15

14 Mar 2026, 03:09 UTC577 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Update: Same chart. 36 days later. Still the bottom. Just sideways. Pain.

11

6 Feb 2026, 17:13 UTC738 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

nice reaction, but don't know how much faith i have in it.

6💯3🌭1

6 Feb 2026, 00:44 UTC689 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Daily RSI on BTC hitting a level not seen since the COVID crash.

8🥴4

6 Feb 2026, 00:38 UTC611 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

first potential support on SOL blown straight through. 😡😡😡

👀41🆒1

6 Feb 2026, 00:37 UTC521 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

at least someone bid. lol. don't know if it will hold though. (ETH) crazy price action.

🤣31

5 Feb 2026, 21:25 UTC448 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Also, Trader Bluntz is right about the RSI levels. They are oversold to historic levels. Something to be aware of. https://x.com/Bluntz_Capital/status/2019484631071092998?s=20

5🤯1

5 Feb 2026, 21:24 UTC464 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ETH choppy trendline, and a horizontal level I'm watching. It's rough, but i'll post it anyways.

4😢2🙈1

5 Feb 2026, 21:21 UTC364 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

these would basically be my two bid areas. 78-74, and then 40 again if it fails. Ethereum chart is chopped, don't really see a clear support on it. Tough to call. But Solana more cleaner than BTC and ETH at the moment.

5🤝2

5 Feb 2026, 21:18 UTC525 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

first area on Solana that I'm looking for a real bounce.

👀732

28 Jan 2026, 22:33 UTC≈1,540 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I'm zooming out on the ETH weekly, and I'm looking at the MACD curling up, and the RSI trend. It has the look of something before a major parabolic trend. It's had years of higher lows now. That coupled with the ETH/BTC chart. I just can't stop looking at it.

10🤔4🌚2🔥2🤷‍♂2👏1

27 Jan 2026, 17:04 UTC543 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

there is the DXY breaking this 14 year trend line. Pretty good breakdown on it so far.

🔥12

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rekttekashi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Trader Mayne’s TA
@officialtradermayne · 26,493
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rekt Daily” (@rekttekashi), 1,143 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rekttekashi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.