Posted without readable text
✍3custom 53348108286233239281

Channel
@relerrtodd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
303subscribers
+81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001737227905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @relerrtodd |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/relerrtodd |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 303 | +6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 297 | +9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 288 | +19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 269 | +37 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 232 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 222 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 222 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 24 | 36.4% | |
| custom 5334810828623323928 | 18 | 27.3% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5458528710204345355 | 7 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5289776361357977584 | 5 | 7.58% | |
| custom 5823396253697838259 | 1 | 1.52% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
✍3custom 53348108286233239281
Channel photo updated
Видеомодель, которая слышит физику Black Forest Labs показала FLUX 3 — не очередной генератор роликов, а базовую модель, которая учится сразу на видео, картинках и звуке. Логика в том, что все три вместе рассказывают модели одно и то же: как падают предметы, как звучит удар, как причина связана со следствием. Пока это ранний доступ, детали — в официальном анонсе Black Forest Labs Что заявляют: — ролики до 20 секунд…
custom 53348108286233239285✍1custom 58233962536978382591
Seedance 2.5 — новый рывок в видео от ByteDance ByteDance анонсировали новую версию своей видеомодели — Seedance 2.5. Судя по анонсу, апгрейд получился не косметический: почти все ключевые параметры генерации выросли в разы. Что обещают: — непрерывная генерация видео до 30 секунд; — до 50 мультимодальных референсов на вход: текст, фото, видео, аудио и сценарии; — R2V-контроль — управление движением, положением объе…
🔥3✍1custom 53348108286233239281
Как оплачивать зарубежные подписки без своей карты Короче, тема, которая рано или поздно встаёт перед всеми, кто работает с зарубежными сервисами: ChatGPT Plus, Adobe, стоки, подписки на нейросети — платить за них с российской карты напрямую не выйдет. Расскажу по своему опыту. Я второй месяц пользуюсь ботом PakoPayBot — оплачиваю через него подписки на западные сервисы. По моему опыту наценка у них одна из самых н…
🔥6custom 52897763613579775845✍3
Posted without readable text
🔥3custom 54585287102043453552✍1
Какими нейросетями вы пользуетесь для повседневных, нерабочих задач?
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥1
Posted without readable text
custom 53348108286233239283✍2custom 54585287102043453552
Учителя против калькуляторов В апреле 1986 года в Вашингтоне на конференции National Council of Teachers of Mathematics около 20 учителей математики устроили пикет. Организовал акцию Джон Саксон — учитель и автор популярных учебников Что говорили: — калькуляторы в начальной школе отучают детей считать в голове; — инструмент подменяет базовый навык, а не усиливает его; — дети перестанут понимать, что стоит за цифрам…
🔥4custom 53348108286233239282custom 54585287102043453552
ИИ-реклама уже везде Баннеры в городе, ролики в лентах, даже озвучка в рекламе на радио — всё чаще это сделано нейросетями, а не съёмочной группой Для брендов это дешевле и быстрее: не нужно арендовать студию, собирать актёров, ждать монтаж неделями. Для нас, зрителей, картинка вокруг становится искусственной — и подозрительно однородной Я как продакшнер смотрю на это спокойно: часть рутины забирают нейросети, а ж…
custom 53348108286233239285🔥3
Claude Opus 5 — мощный ответ OpenAI Anthropic выпустили Claude Opus 5 — обновление старшей модели линейки, которая тянет долгие агентные сессии и тяжёлую работу почти на уровне топовой модели Fable 5, но вдвое дешевле 🤯 Что обещают: — на тестах по кодингу Frontier-Bench модель более чем вдвое обгоняет предыдущую версию Opus 4.8, и результат дешевле в пересчёте на задачу; — на бенчмарке для решения нестандартных зад…
🔥4custom 53348108286233239281custom 54585287102043453551
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @relerrtodd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какими нейросетями вы пользуетесь для повседневных, нерабочих задач?
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Владос на связи|Нейросети и контент” (@relerrtodd), 303 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/relerrtodd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.