Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fawāʿid al-ʿIlm | فوائد في العلم

Channel

Fawāʿid al-ʿIlm | فوائد في العلم

@remindersofilm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

148subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002279849688
TypeChannel
Username@remindersofilm
Created20 November 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/remindersofilm

Growth

139148143.57 August 2026 — 139 subscribers7 August 2026 — 140 subscribers8 August 2026 — 140 subscribers14 August 2026 — 144 subscribers22 August 2026 — 146 subscribers28 August 2026 — 147 subscribers5 September 2026 — 148 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 29 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138–149 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:40148+1
28 Aug 2026, 10:34147+1
22 Aug 2026, 09:19146+2
14 Aug 2026, 01:08144+4
8 Aug 2026, 22:30140no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:47140+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:03139first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC723 viewsread 8 August 2026

Is there an Increase Hatred towards Islām? As much as people push the notion that there’s an increase in hatred towards Islām in today’s times. This really isn’t true. The enmity in the hearts of the disbelievers towards Islām was established 1,400 Years Ago : • Qurʾān 2:120 : “Never will the Jews or Christians be pleased with you, until you follow their faith. Say, ‘Allah’s guidance is the only ˹true˺ guidance.’

26 Apr 2026, 18:49 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 8 August 2026

The Baby that Wrapped His Arms around my Leg During the Friday Prayer, I placed a water bottle in front of me before starting the prayer. A man brought his small baby with him to the prayer, and stood beside me, placing his child in front of him. The baby took my water bottle immediately and would suckle on the lid, confused as to why he wasn’t able to drink the water. When the Imām got to the end of Sūrah Fatihah

21 Apr 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 8 August 2026

a Beautiful Pain There’s a type of beauty that is indescribable, found in the pain one experiences that ultimately turns them back to their Lord. When a servant of Allāh falls into sin, it is often followed by a heaviness within the chest: a quiet emptiness, a lingering discomfort that unsettles the heart. Joy begins to fade, replaced by a subtle grief that weighs upon the soul. For the one who reflects, they will

16 Apr 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 8 August 2026

Stripping Tawḥīd from Ḥakimiyyah Whilst there have been clarifications from scholars that “Tawḥīd al-Ḥakimiyyah” is not its own distinct category of Tawḥīd, their reasoning wasn’t because it had no ties to Tawḥīd, rather because it encompasses the other categories of Tawḥīd already. Thus distinguishing it wouldn’t make sense. Amongst those today, exists those who blood boils when one speaks about the issue of Ḥakim

11 Apr 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ascribing Victimhood to Women What has become quite prevalent on social media platforms, is the filth both men and women get to behind close doors in private messages when either one side or both sides are accounts that have Daʿwah pages. Often the case, when the man is rightfully exposed, people ascribe “victimhood” to the woman involved when in reality blame should be directed at sisters for entertaining him, sen

8 Apr 2026, 23:15 UTC308 viewsread 8 August 2026

Humiliation of the Ummah The state of this Ummah has not come about except due to our shortcomings wholeheartedly in abandoning the acts that are Farḍ (obligatory) upon us and the overall deviation from Tawḥīd and the correct ʿAqīdah. Included in this without a doubt, is also the deviation of the rulers who have partially abandoned the Sharīʿah - for how can it be that in the land of the muslims, that the systems o

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @remindersofilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fawāʿid al-ʿIlm | فوائد في العلم” (@remindersofilm), 148 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/remindersofilm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.