Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ANTI SCAM (Ru)

Channel

ANTI SCAM (Ru)

@remove_scamming

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

10,717subscribers

+281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002192237187
TypeChannel
Username@remove_scamming
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/remove_scamming

Growth

10,42510,75710,5917 August 2026 — 10,436 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,436 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,434 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,431 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,426 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,427 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,425 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,723 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,751 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,757 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,755 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,752 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,754 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,750 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,748 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,746 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,742 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,739 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,735 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,730 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,717 subscribers10,7177 August 20268 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 31 days, net +281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,375–10,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:3710,717-13
4 Sept 2026, 22:1810,730-5
3 Sept 2026, 06:2510,735-4
2 Sept 2026, 04:1310,739-3
1 Sept 2026, 01:1710,742-4
30 Aug 2026, 23:3710,746-2
29 Aug 2026, 22:3510,748-2
28 Aug 2026, 19:4510,750-3
27 Aug 2026, 17:3810,753-1
26 Aug 2026, 15:3210,754-2
25 Aug 2026, 16:5210,756+4
24 Aug 2026, 18:2410,752-4
23 Aug 2026, 06:1310,756+3
19 Aug 2026, 18:1710,753-2
18 Aug 2026, 16:0510,755-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:2710,757+6
16 Aug 2026, 14:3510,751+28
14 Aug 2026, 21:4510,723+298
13 Aug 2026, 12:0510,425-2
11 Aug 2026, 10:2710,427first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 10,717 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.644%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held15 (30 July 202630 August 2026)
Views total14,871
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔3234.0%
🥰2021.3%
👍1819.1%
🤯1414.9%
🤩77.45%
🔥33.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @remove_scamming. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC611 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

✅ Бот со списком продавцов - @ListSellers_bot ✅ 1 - Рассказать о мошенничестве: @ANTI_SCAM_78 2 - Реклама. Продается. Цена в ЛС. 3 - Проверка каналов. Даем свой вердикт (личное мнение основанное на многочисленном опыте) по каналу (скам / не скам). Цену указываем в сообщения. 4 - Услуги Legit Check. Вердикт + его объяснения. Мы имеем большой опыт работы в этой сфере, сотни проверок на нашем счету. Цена - 500₽ 5 -

27 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,120 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Продажа пали от канала Shin Store ( https://t.me/shinstore777, https://www.avito.ru/user/ed99987dbb94330f16f9112d302e1951/profile?src=sharing, @manysens, @ceostoreineurope ) Я нашел человека на Авито с обычным профилем. Он продавал худи Stone Island Supreme за 30.000₽ с одним нюансом. В описании указал, что готов к любым проверкам. Я связался с ним 26 августа, и пока он отвечал, на следующий день мы перешли в тг. Он

🥰1

25 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,300 views2 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

Откровенный скам от канала U N R E A L ( https://t.me/+fhMx2uzKl6E2ZWJi, https://unrealcloth.store/shop.html, @toxa_seller ) 29 июня списался с админом по поводу кроссовок Balenciaga Track faded. Продавец обещал доставку за 7 дней. В этот же день я заполнил данные Почты России и перевел 7.200₽. Продавец пообещал отправку в ближайшее время. Трек долго не отправляли, а позже админ заявил, что по "новым прави

🤯2

23 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,100 views20 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Откровенный скам от канала Tenserism ( https://t.me/tenserism, @managieer ) В апреле я решил заказать браслетик в качестве подарка и связался с манагером Tenserism. Он прислал реквизиты, я оплатил 3.000₽ и получил ссылку на канал с информацией. На посте с этим браслетом были указаны примерные сроки доставки до 21 дня. Я попросил оповестить меня, когда браслет приедет, но со временем сам решил узнать о своем заказе.

👍14🤯5🤩1

21 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,080 views18 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Откровенный скам от канала форс маркет ( https://t.me/fors_market_off, @fors_adm ) Я присмотрел худи в этом магазине. Мне сказали, что оно находится на складе, и мы договорились, что я заберу его в ближайшие дни. Я перевел 6.000₽ за вещь. Однако вскоре общение стало странным. Когда я спросил, отправили ли посылку, получил ответ: «сколько я тебя ждал столько ждать и ты будешь». Позже, когда я спросил, может ли он

🥰11🤯4🤩3

19 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,380 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Откровенный скам от каналов LIMITED SHOP и RETWAQ STORE ( https://t.me/shoping_some_of_the_best, https://t.me/RETWAQ_STORE, @Slevt_1, https://www.avito.ru/user/8779309108113a94c1786384cf8a0793/profile?src=sharing ) Нашел на Авито футболку Stone Island Off Dye и написал продавцу с вопросом, за какую сумму он готов ее продать с возможностью торга. Продавец ответил, что за 9.000₽. После этого мы перешли в тг, где я нач

🥰3🤯1

19 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,000 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

🕊️ БЕЛЫЙ СПИСОК / МОЖНО ДОВЕРЯТЬ ✅ UNITY | STORE 👈 Работаем более 5-ти лет. Имеем больше 1100 отзывов, большое наличие и огромный выбор позиций под заказ! ————————— #Советуем_к_покупкам #БС

🥰3🤯1

17 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Откровенный скам от канала M6 STORE ( https://t.me/+JN_zYGo42uA2Zjgy, @managerbalenciaga ) Мы выбрали интересующие нас позиции в данном магазине и обсудили все детали заказа. В результате мы оформили заказ на сумму 5.100₽. Продавец сказал, что отправка будет произведена в течение одного рабочего дня. Это было 8 августа. На сегодняшний день мы не получили никакой информации о заказе. При этом по их словам,

14 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,560 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Откровенный скам от канала GLANCE.WEAR ( https://t.me/glanceeewear , @glancedm ) В январе решил заказать джинсы и лонгслив Jaded London в данном магазине за 820 бун (~22.800₽). Был уверен в них, так как этот магазин раньше был очень популярным в РБ. Обещали доставку в течение 8-12 дней, но прошел месяц, и мне сказали, что моя вещь будет в следующей посылке. Это затянулось до апреля, и в итоге написали, что перевозчи

💔6

12 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,320 views13 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026
Photo

Casual’s.Closet СКАМ на состояние вещей, указано 8/10, приходит 4-5/10, 2 жалобы 3 жалоба - черный список @casualsclst ❌❌❌

💔13

11 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈2,030 views15 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Безразличное отношение от канала BB Clothes ( https://t.me/BBshmotki, @IllIIIllllIIIIIllllll ) Искал себе шмотку на др, чтобы себя побаловать, и нашел один шоп с неплохими вещами. Этот канал был у меня в подписках, так как он участвовал в каком-то гиве. Я выбрал для себя футболку Number Nine, которая напоминала мои отношения, и сразу написал, что хочу ее купить. Я оплатил заказ за 6.000₽, но вскоре узнал, что футбо

💔13🥰2

9 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Откровенный скам от канала goopshp ( https://t.me/+0PAh53wHFidmOWEy, @goopmanager ) Я увидел рекламу в популярном тгк и решил зайти в приват по лоуболам. Заказал там Maison Margiela на общую сумму около 13.000₽, если не ошибаюсь. Продавец принял оплату через Alipay и казался нормальным. Он сказал, что доставка не будет очень быстрой, но и не займет много времени. В итоге посылка ехала к нему около двух месяцев. Про

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @remove_scamming. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@remove_scamming edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ANTI SCAM (Ru)” (@remove_scamming), 10,717 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/remove_scamming.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.