Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Renard Occultisme

Channel

Renard Occultisme

@renard_occultisme

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,288subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706268977
TypeChannel
Username@renard_occultisme
Created10 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/renard_occultisme

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2542,2892,271.56 August 2026 — 2,254 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,259 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,260 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,261 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,269 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,265 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,268 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,267 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,275 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,279 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,283 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,289 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,288 subscribers2,2886 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,249–2,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:002,288-1
13 Sept 2026, 02:422,289+6
8 Sept 2026, 23:402,283+4
3 Sept 2026, 17:002,279+4
31 Aug 2026, 16:132,275+8
29 Aug 2026, 00:132,267-1
26 Aug 2026, 00:322,268+3
19 Aug 2026, 20:382,265-4
16 Aug 2026, 22:072,269+8
13 Aug 2026, 11:152,261+1
10 Aug 2026, 01:032,260+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:162,259+5
6 Aug 2026, 08:372,254first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

423 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16238.3%
❤15837.4%
👍7417.5%
👎214.96%
🥰61.42%
😍20.473%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 423 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @renard_occultisme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC236 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Искусственный интеллект и религиозное воображение будущего: сравнительное исследование эсхатологии, сотериологии и технологического утопизма Источник: Studies on Religion and Philosophy, 2025, 1(4), 53–62 by Zhanyi Li Перевела: #Sorora_Fascia, Сообщество Renard Occultisme Мало какие из современных технологий породили столько спекулятивных нарративов о будущем, сколько искусственный интеллект. Публичные и академичес…

🔥8❤6👍4👎2

3 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC302 views20 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤7👍6🔥6😍1

2 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC367 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Итак, мы снова открываем набор в чат канала «Renard Occultisme». Чат создан для общения на темы оккультизма, религиоведения, истории, культуры и т.д., и предназначен как для теоретиков, так и для практиков различных традиций. Иногда мы читаем лекции и мини-лекции внутри для общего развития. Напоминаем правила: 0. При входе представьтесь, скажите пару слов о себе и обязательно прочтите правила, отпишитесь, что согл…

❤10👎2🔥2👍1

1 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC419 views22 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥11👍6❤4👎1

31 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC413 views28 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

Как сделать собственный санг? Краткая инструкция по созданию собственных сыпучих благовоний Автор: #Sorora_Fascia Сообщество Renard Occultisme Те, кто так или иначе знаком с восточными традициями или практикует их, как правило, много пользуются благовониями — в виде конусов, палочек, шариков или, что реже, сыпучих. Но часто случается так, что благовония, доступные для покупки на маркетплейсах или в лавках, не удовл…

🔥17❤7👍2👎2

28 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC548 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Божества в корейском шаманизме Источник: The role of shamanism in Korean society in its inter- and intra-cultural contacts by Jinseok Seo Перевела: #Sorora_Fascia, Сообщество Renard Occultisme Как представляется, в упомянутой выше дискуссии, касающейся концептуализации шаманизма как мугё и мусок, большинство попыток было направлено на осмысление корейского шаманизма и как проявления народной культуры или обычаев, и…

❤9🔥4👍2👎1

26 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC562 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Освящение Будды: формирование ритуала покчан в эпоху Корё Источник: Consecrating the Buddha: The Formation of the Bokjang Ritual during the Goryeo Period by Lee Seunghye Перевела: #Sorora_Fascia, Сообщество Renard Occultisme Дисклеймер: Внимание! Автор перевода до этого не имел опыта в переводе академической литературы, связанной с Кореей. Если есть ошибки — дайте знать. В корейской буддийской традиции термин «пок…

❤4👍3🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC675 views9 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Философия раннего буддизма Источник:Civilized shamans : Buddhism in Tibetan societies by Samuel Geoffrey Перевела: #Sorora_Fascia, Сообщество Renard Occultisme Если ранний буддизм был переформулированием шаманского прозрения на языке, релевантном новой ситуации, то философия раннего буддизма должна представлять собой попытку создания рациональной структуры, согласующейся с этим прозрением. В действительности, ранни…

❤3👍3🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC593 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уважаемые слушатели! Через 13 минут начинается лекция на платформе лектория "Обилие Софы". Напоминаю, что если Вы регистрировались, а ссылка не пришла - обязательно загляните в папку "Спам"!

👍10👎3❤1

18 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTC711 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Как получилось, что суровый, холодный и прагматичный горный край превратился в массовом сознании в стерильный рай просветленных миролюбцев? Почему западный мир предпочел выдумать «идеальную Шамбалу», вместо того чтобы попытаться понять реальный тантрический буддизм с его пугающей недвойственностью? И как священные ритуалы превратились в инструкцию для кислотного трипа и корпоративные курсы повышения продуктивности? …

🔥19❤6👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @renard_occultisme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Inquizitor Library. Книги по магии и эзотерике.
@Inquizitor_Library · 42,245
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
Fire walks with me
@chaoss_flame · 52,306
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Renard Occultisme” (@renard_occultisme), 2,288 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renard_occultisme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.