Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rene Gräber

Channel

Rene Gräber

@renegraeber

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,426subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001237311267
TypeChannel
Username@renegraeber
Created23 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/renegraeber

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,41019,46719,438.56 August 2026 — 19,411 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,411 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,413 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,410 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,413 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,418 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,420 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,426 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,430 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,434 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,440 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,442 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,439 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,437 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,435 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,436 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,432 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,435 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,449 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,456 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,454 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,459 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,467 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,464 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,458 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,453 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,446 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,441 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,429 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,426 subscribers19,4266 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,401–19,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:0019,426-3
15 Sept 2026, 06:2119,429-12
13 Sept 2026, 14:5919,441-5
11 Sept 2026, 22:1919,446-7
9 Sept 2026, 12:1519,453-5
6 Sept 2026, 04:2019,458-6
4 Sept 2026, 01:0019,464-3
2 Sept 2026, 14:3619,467+8
1 Sept 2026, 12:4319,459+5
31 Aug 2026, 13:2619,454-2
30 Aug 2026, 10:2619,456+7
29 Aug 2026, 11:3519,449+14
28 Aug 2026, 09:2719,435+3
26 Aug 2026, 02:3319,432-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:4619,436+1
24 Aug 2026, 02:3919,435-2
22 Aug 2026, 13:4719,437-2
21 Aug 2026, 02:2319,439-3
18 Aug 2026, 23:1719,442+2
18 Aug 2026, 00:2519,440first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 19,426 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,380
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held40 (16 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total30,678
Reactions total857
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 35s
Average length
2m 46s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,954 reactions across 40 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,09842.3%
1,15623.3%
👏2074.18%
🤮1943.92%
🙈1743.51%
💯1623.27%
🙏1543.11%
🤣1432.89%
😁1212.44%
🤬1072.16%
🔥691.39%
😨591.19%
581.17%
🤪531.07%
😢501.01%
🤔290.585%
😱270.545%
🏆170.343%
💩140.283%
🤯130.262%
12 further kinds490.989%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,954 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 21:06 UTC518 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉 Es war so klar: Jetzt kommen die „Impfstoffe gegen Krebs“ Seit meiner Kindheit kenne ich jetzt solche Schlagzeilen. 👉 „Durchbruch in der Krebstherapie.“ 👉 „Neue Hoffnung für Krebspatienten.“ 👉 „Revolution in der Onkologie.“ Und natürlich immer irgendwo am Horizont: Der Krebs könnte bald besiegt sein. Jetzt ist die mRNA an der Reihe -- und es war so klar. Es war klar dass nach Corona diese Substanzen in großem S

👍17💯5😨2🙏21

31 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈4,100 views188 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉 Aha! Plötzlich darf man Politiker und sogar den Bundeskanzler wieder scharf kritisieren. Man lernt ja nie aus. Da sitzt also eine Kinderärztin bei RTL dem Bundeskanzler gegenüber und wirft ihm (per Video-Einspielung!) eine Politik vor, die sie bis zum „Bruch des Amtseids“ zuspitzt. Und was passiert? Sie wird gefeiert. Wo ist denn die Empörung über die „Delegitimierung des Staates“??? Keine besorgten Leitartikel

👍11527🙏18💯14👏7😨32🤣1

30 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈5,560 views196 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉 Es gab einmal eine Zeit, da galt gentechnisch veränderter Mais vielen Deutschen als ungefähr das Gefährlichste, was einem auf einem Teller begegnen konnte. Man verlangte eine Kennzeichnung. Man wollte wissen, was drin ist. Die Mehrheit misstraute Konzernen. Und überhaupt: Gentechnik? Nein danke. Dann kam Corona. Plötzlich war ein erstaunlicher Teil derselben Gesellschaft bereit, sich "genetische Informationen" i

👍15624👏10💯6

29 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈4,360 views108 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉Es gibt Tote, an die wir uns erinnern sollen. Und es gibt Tote, bei denen das öffentliche Gedächtnis erstaunlich schnell nachlässt. Vioxx gehört zur zweiten Kategorie. Das Schmerzmittel kam 1999 auf den Markt. Schon im Jahr 2000 gab es ein deutliches Herzinfarktsignal. Vom Markt genommen wurde es trotzdem erst 2004... Später wertete der FDA-Wissenschaftler David Graham die Daten von rund 1,4 Millionen Versichert

👍7616🙏12😢4

27 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC≈5,110 views131 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Die Frage ist nicht ob diese Dinger kommen, die Frage ist wann. Bei den zweiten World Humanoid Robot Games in Peking lief der TianGong Ultra die 100 Meter in 8,64 Sekunden. 8,64 SEKUNDEN AUF 100 METER. 🤖🔥 Das ist schon irre. Zum Vergleich: Usain Bolts Weltrekord: 9,58 Sekunden. Und noch erstaunlicher ist die Entwicklung: 2025 brauchte der Siegerroboter noch 21,50 Sekunden. Jetzt: 9,39 Sekunden zum Auftakt. 8,86 S

🤣50🤔2220🤮15🙈11👍8😱5

27 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈5,820 views129 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉 BOOAHHH -- Es geht weiter. BILD titelt heute: "15.800 Menschen mehr während Hitzewelle gestorben" Darüber steht immerhin noch der entscheidende Hinweis: "Schätzung des Robert-Koch-Instituts" Genau: Schätzung. Es wurden nicht 15.800 Totenscheine ausgewertet, auf denen als Todesursache "Hitze" vermerkt war. Das RKI berechnet anhand von Temperaturen und beobachteter Sterblichkeit, wie viele Todesfälle statistisch d

🤣57👍4718🦄5👏2

26 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC≈5,210 views78 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉 Nach einem Zeckenstich schaut fast jeder nach dem berühmten roten Ring. Kann hilfreich sein, muss es aber nicht... Denn eine Wanderröte bei Borreliose kann zwar klassisch ringförmig aussehen – **sie muss es aber nicht. Sie kann gleichmäßig rot sein, Oval oder auch unregelmäßig begrenzt. Oder nur teilweise ringförmig. Manchmal treten sogar mehrere Hautveränderungen auf. Und bei einer Borreliose kann die typische

👍5419🙏5

23 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈6,090 views116 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @corona_best_ofVideo

Hier ein seltenes Fundstück aus der Corona-Zeit. Eine Aufnahme einer Insassin in einem Corona-Lager in Ausstralien. Sie diskutiert hier mit den "Aufsehern" ob und wie weit Sie sich von ihrer Wohnbox / "Zelle" entfernen dürfe. Folge dem Kanal. Jetzt. 🔥 https://t.me/corona_best_of

🤬68🙈178🤯6😢65🤮4🔥2

22 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC≈7,760 views245 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉 Novak Djokovic. Tennis-Legende. 24 Grand-Slam-Titel. Zehnmal Sieger der Australian Open. Olympiasieger. Einer der größten Tennisspieler aller Zeiten. Der Mann, der sich 2021/2022 weigerte, sich der Gentech-Spritze zu unterziehen. Er musste sich klar gewesen sein, was ihn diese Entscheidung kosten konnte. Turniere, Weltranglistenpunkte, Millionen Dollar Preisgeld. Djokovic blieb trotzdem dabei. Respekt. Der Mann

146💯46👏27👍213❤‍🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈6,030 views133 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🟥👉 Während es in den USA den Hauptakteuren der Corona-Zeit zunehmend an den Kragen zu gehen scheint (siehe Fauci, Morens usw.), wird in Deutschland das alte Narrativ weiter aufrechterhalten. FOCUS Online titelt aktuell: „Corona-Impfung senkte Sterblichkeit in Europa um 57 Prozent.“ Das klingt nach einer Tatsache -- ist aber eine Modellrechnung. Genau. Die gleichen "Modelle" mit denen man den Untergang zwischen 2020

👍7727👏11🤬8🙏82

17 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈6,960 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟥👉 Schmerzen: Ursachen & naturheilkundliche Behandlung: https://www.naturheilt.com/schmerzen/ Ich habe meinen Grundsatzbeitrag dazu mal komplett überarbeitet. Ich packe da jetzt nicht mehr die Verfahren am Ende rein, sondern baue die Grundsatzartikel jetzt anders auf... Schaut mal rein bitte und sagt mir wie euch das "gefällt", bzw. wie und ob das hilfreich ist... Ihr kennt euch ja aus bei den Ärzten, Kollegen und

👍576🙏1

16 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈7,530 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🟥👉 Ständige Blasenentzündung: Was Naturheilkunde & Alternativmedizin kann: https://www.yamedo.de/blasenentzuendung/ Eine Blasenentzündung wird gern als lästige Kleinigkeit abgetan. Doch wiederkehrende Beschwerden haben Gründe: hartnäckige Bakterien, Biofilme, resistente Keime und manchmal eine unzureichend ausgeheilte Infektion. Das ist jedenfalls das, was Frauen erzählt wird. Es gibt noch andere Gründe auf die ich

40🙏21👍13👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @renegraeber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rene Gräber” (@renegraeber), 19,426 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renegraeber.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.