Channel
@rentafool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002167726084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rentafool |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rentafool |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 5 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 5 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Обычно на Ламмас появляется естественная потребность подвести итоги. Часто они сами подсвечиваются без всяких усилий. В этом году я подхожу к Ламмасу в разобранном виде. Чувство, что стою посреди выжженной земли, а босые ноги кровоточат от ожогов. И гулкий ветер. Я в точке 0. Больше сказать нечего.
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Кутюрная неделя началась, и это хороший повод напомнить, что haute couture — это не «очень дорогое и красивое», а юридически защищённое наименование: во Франции титул выдаётся решением министерства промышленности, действует ровно один год, и каждый год дома подают заявку заново. Статус реально могут отобрать. Правила секретного клуба существуют с 1945-го: 🔘Шить made-to-measure для частных клиентов с примерками — пр…
Сигра очень точно и ёмко сформулировала.
Channel name was changed to «Hic sunt dracones»
Я что-то говорила про скандинавский вайб на Ле-Мане? Забудьте 😂 Там Чемпионат Мира подъехал с вайбовыми норвежцами: https://youtube.com/shorts/2EgM6VaqZ_0?si=2B2Avcv15LQU0sYT
😁1
Открыла лесной сезон 🥰
🔥1
Каким-то боком добавился в пост мой кубик, ну пусть будет 😁
Просто посмотрите на 7 позицию на стартовой решетке Ле-Мана. Скандинавский вайб на максимуме. Тут и Тор Тим, и 9 номер, и гиперкар Валькирия 🖤
Прекрасное дополнение к прошедшему марафону по Сету. Солкина приятно слушать. Информации он наваливает будь здоров как много, местами с юмором. И атмосфера классная)
😵💫 Рубрика: «что же написано о Сетхе»? Недавно был сделан пост о классификации изображений, где Сетх пронзает змея-врага. Там я прикрепила изображение рельефа из храма Хибис в оазисе Харга. Сегодня я хочу разобрать надпись, которая и помогает нам понять, что там именно Сетх, а не Хор, как некоторые могут ошибочно подумать. Для этого на изображении вы можете увидеть прорисовку рельефа, так как в оригинале может быт…
На первой встрече по Анимусу говорили про непризнанную власть и о разрушительном мифе в жизни женщины о недоступности некоторых ресурсов. Хотелось бы сегодня про власть кое что сказать. Она есть у нас у всех в разных местах, в разных формах, в разном диапазоне. Слово «власть» пугает, отвращает. Оно весьма сильно напичкано коллективным опытом, тенью и памятью всех женщин мира. Но! Одно из того, что может возвращать …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rentafool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ваше мнение по поводу игрулек
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hic sunt dracones” (@rentafool), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rentafool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.