Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reorx’s Forge

Channel

Reorx’s Forge

@reorx_share

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,193subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188515781
TypeChannel
Username@reorx_share
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/reorx_share

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,1583,2123,1856 August 2026 — 3,168 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,166 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,162 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,158 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,165 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,161 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,159 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,169 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,212 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,200 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,198 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,193 subscribers3,1936 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,150–3,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:213,193-5
13 Sept 2026, 18:013,198-2
9 Sept 2026, 14:573,200-12
3 Sept 2026, 23:363,212+43
1 Sept 2026, 00:493,169+10
29 Aug 2026, 01:353,159-2
25 Aug 2026, 18:243,161-4
23 Aug 2026, 04:443,165+7
19 Aug 2026, 20:423,158-3
16 Aug 2026, 17:463,161-1
12 Aug 2026, 22:543,162-4
6 Aug 2026, 23:433,166-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:343,168first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3725.7%
😭2920.1%
🤣2819.4%
2013.9%
👀117.64%
😱74.86%
🤯74.86%
😢21.39%
🥰21.39%
👏10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC211 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1rxuw6eEWp/ 看的时候隐约感觉到有点复古千禧味,看完瞅一眼工作室,完美的一天,果然,那就不奇怪了

7 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC487 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

这句话简直绝杀 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49182146

😭8

7 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC485 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

nanobot 一点也不 nano 了,记得最早就只是个跑 claude agent sdk 的 agent loop, 现在要依赖 docker, docker compose, onecli…一大堆组件

7 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC490 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.heyiam.dk/hoy 这东西的工作原理竟然是 Photos 的 shared album, 基于它的跨账户数据分享能力,实现了无须面对面的 Airdrop。真是个让人直呼「我怎么就没想到呢」的点子。

🤯3

6 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC552 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

在 Zed DeltaDB 的 HN评论里看到了 "engineering privilege" 这个词:一些公司的工程师能长期做与核心产品无关的事,不断重造轮子,写新编译器、包管理器、框架……还不需要明显的营收承诺。这听起来让人羡慕,似乎也不太符合商业逻辑,但我们用的很多好东西正是这么来的。 曾经硅谷给人的印象就是这样一个地方:大公司给了程序员这群单纯的人无需为生活担忧的薪水、宽松的管理和自由探索的氛围,正是这些条件,催生了过去二十年无数举足轻重、影响深远的开源项目。更早的时候,在电子科技发展的初期,贝尔实验室那样的地方也是如此,为业界输出了无数改变世界的技术和人才。所以我一直觉得,Google 就是计算机和互联网领域的贝尔实验室。 学术界其实也一样,同样存在 "academia privilege"。学术界本就应该提供宽松的环境,鼓励人们出于对科学的热爱和自身的兴趣,在自己喜欢的方向上探索,而不是出于功利主义,为钱或为名

8

6 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC574 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

才知道蔚蓝有这么一个 mod,和好多独立游戏进行了联动,包括 minecraft, terraria, undertale, hollow knight, portal… 这下必须装回来再玩一遍了 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJIvHfzGjqo

🤯4🥰2

5 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC715 viewsread 7 August 2026

《爱与机器人维修技术》,这名字是爱死机与《禅与摩托车维修艺术》的融合啊 扮演赛博医生,维修机器人的剧情冒险游戏。 机器人都市中,疾病悄然蔓延。拆开机器人的后脑与胸腔,探索病因。倾听、诊断、治疗,和形形色色的患者命运交汇。揭开过去和未来的秘密,发现令每个机器人生来独一无二的真相。 https://store.steampowered.com/app/3473430/_All_Our_Broken_Parts/

5 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC≈1,060 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Keychron Nape Pro 轨迹球鼠标,想买一个试试,放在键盘下面代替鼠标,这个用法我太喜欢了。人生买的第一个键盘就是 Thinkpad 小红点,就是因为我不想因为少量用鼠标的需求让手轻易离开键盘 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIfsFvmQtvc 之前收藏过类似的产品有: • https://ploopy.co/ • https://github.com/Bastardkb/Charybdis

👍4

5 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC989 viewsread 7 August 2026

Cloudflare 出的这个 Wallet, 算是终于让我意识到了加密货币和 agent 的一个结合点,之前我一直悲观地认为 AI 和 cryptocurrency 只能活一个,而后者显然是个时代的绊脚石,现在看来我的一个 BTC 或许有救了… https://blog.cloudflare.com/wallets/

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @reorx_share. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

小声读书 🙈
@weekly_books · 38,148
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reorx’s Forge” (@reorx_share), 3,193 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reorx_share.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.