Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📨 DEFOLT +REP

Channel

📨 DEFOLT +REP

@repkag

5 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

103subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002191691339
TypeChannel
Usernames@neglasnost @nissan_epower @planovost @repkag @seryozshka
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/repkag

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

103106104.58 August 2026 — 106 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106 subscribers15 August 2026 — 105 subscribers15 August 2026 — 105 subscribers15 August 2026 — 105 subscribers16 August 2026 — 105 subscribers17 August 2026 — 105 subscribers22 August 2026 — 104 subscribers23 August 2026 — 104 subscribers24 August 2026 — 104 subscribers15 September 2026 — 103 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 38 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 17:02103-1
24 Aug 2026, 12:44104no change
23 Aug 2026, 09:07104no change
22 Aug 2026, 11:42104-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:54105no change
16 Aug 2026, 17:53105no change
15 Aug 2026, 19:57105no change
15 Aug 2026, 17:45105no change
15 Aug 2026, 15:58105-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:32106no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:18106first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52311586047525159651715.2%
👍1715.2%
❤1513.4%
custom 54090484192116828431412.5%
custom 522911021458997460998.04%
custom 524692641324365158876.25%
custom 542716808307462896376.25%
custom 523144912063537068454.46%
custom 537762096239085734254.46%
💋32.68%
👀21.79%
🗿21.79%
😁21.79%
😈21.79%
🤝21.79%
🍾10.893%
💯10.893%
😱10.893%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @repkag. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 18:25 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Передал нфт @qdqlq от души все четко, быстро +реп

custom 53776209623908573422custom 52311586047525159651

26 Jul 2026, 22:02 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+реп Быстро Без скама Выгодно Большой осартимент @qdqlq 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘

custom 52311586047525159652😁1

24 Jul 2026, 20:23 UTC53 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+реп быстро все сделал ответа не заставил ждать цены адекватные❤️❤️❤️ @qdqlq

❤2custom 52311586047525159651

20 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC60 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

@qdqlq + реп быстро обменял ❤️

❤3custom 52469264132436515882💯1

13 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC142 views7 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

@qdqlq +rep оплатил нфт

custom 52291102145899746094custom 54090484192116828432👀1

13 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC135 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+реп @qdqlq купил 11 юзаков оптом не ворк к сожалению

custom 52311586047525159653custom 52291102145899746092custom 54271680830746289632

13 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC117 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+ реп махнул баксы во второй раз @qdqlq

custom 52291102145899746093🗿2👍1

12 Jun 2026, 18:21 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+ реп обменял 15 баксов за 1 секунду лучший обменник @qdqlq

custom 52314491206353706843custom 52469264132436515883custom 54090484192116828431

9 Jun 2026, 06:29 UTC70 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+реп @qdqlq продал 1.7$ лучший сделал всë быстро

👍2custom 54090484192116828432🍾1

8 Jun 2026, 06:33 UTC87 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Все отлично купил 0.8 тон @qdqlq Как всегда все сделал быстро красавчик +реп

custom 53776209623908573423custom 52311586047525159652👍1😱1

31 May 2026, 15:00 UTC92 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+реп дефолт @qdqlq,кинул сливы шгш и продал юз

custom 52311586047525159653😈2😁1

28 May 2026, 17:39 UTC109 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

+реп @qdqlq красавчик , провел обмен , все чотко , всем советую 👍

custom 54090484192116828433👍2👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @repkag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📨 DEFOLT +REP” (@repkag), 103 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repkag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.