Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @resets

Channel

@resets

@resets

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

371subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002647245042
TypeChannel
Usernames@resets @resetting
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/resets

Growth

369374371.57 August 2026 — 370 subscribers8 August 2026 — 370 subscribers8 August 2026 — 369 subscribers13 August 2026 — 370 subscribers14 August 2026 — 371 subscribers16 August 2026 — 373 subscribers20 August 2026 — 374 subscribers22 August 2026 — 374 subscribers27 August 2026 — 372 subscribers30 August 2026 — 372 subscribers3 September 2026 — 371 subscribers3717 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 368–375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:35371-1
30 Aug 2026, 12:44372no change
27 Aug 2026, 23:35372-2
22 Aug 2026, 22:47374no change
20 Aug 2026, 15:48374+1
16 Aug 2026, 07:18373+2
14 Aug 2026, 02:07371+1
13 Aug 2026, 09:01370+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:31369-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:20370no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:37370first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 12 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👀1760.7%
👾1139.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTCviews —

@resets pinned «doing email resets reagan $100 @reagan.com netzero $125 @netzero.net juno $125 @juno.com earthlink $150 @earthlink.net @mindspring.com @ix.netcom.com @peoplepc.com @onemain.com @netcom.com @sprynet.com @tiac.net @pipeline.com @gate.net @temp4753»

12 Oct 2025, 12:03 UTC≈25,800 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026

doing instant earthlink resets $150 apex.net capecod.net coastalnet.com digital.net earthlink.net gate.net gibralter.net goldsboronc.net greenvillenc.com gulf.net hickory.net icx.net interserv.com ix.netcom.com jps.net mindspring.com onemain.com peoplepc.com pipeline.com rconnect.com rmi.net sprintmail.com sprynet.com teleport.com teleport.net tiac.net together.net usit.com usit.net or $2.5k + 5% for bot access @c

👀17👾11

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @resets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@resets” (@resets), 371 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/resets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.