Любой уважающий себя маркетплейс должен иметь свое job приложение

Channel
Денис Решанов | блог
@reshanov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,369subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001359967228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reshanov |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reshanov |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 1,369 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:27 | 1,368 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 1,366 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,367 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,369 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 1,366 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 1,364 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 1,360 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 1,359 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
193 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 89 | 46.1% | |
| custom 5402406965252989103 | 47 | 24.4% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 21.8% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 3.63% | |
| custom 5377857202771992680 | 6 | 3.11% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.04% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 10
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reshanov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
📝 «М.видео» подало заявку на регистрацию товарного знака M.Job, обнаружили «Ведомости» в «СПАРК-Интерфаксе». Ритейлер собирается искать исполнителей для работы на складах. Представитель «М.видео» информацию подтвердил, уточнив, что M.Job ориентирован на привлечение специалистов для логистического направления, однако в дальнейшем компания рассматривает проект как единую площадку для сотрудничества по договорам оказан…
Про реестр и развитие рынка платформ
👍10custom 54024069652529891031
А вот и первые «счастливчики» – участники реестра посреднических цифровых платформ. МинЭк составил предварительный перечень тех, кого планируют включить в реестр: «Авито», Delivery Club (после покупки «Яндексом» в 2022 году сменил название на «Маркет Деливери»), Joom, Lamoda, Ozon, Wildberries, «Купер», «Магнит Маркет», «Яндекс Go», «Яндекс Еда», «Яндекс Маркет» и «Яндекс Путешествия». —- Если сегодня реестр – это с…
👍5
Мы запустили сайт Союза основателей цифровых платформ гибкой занятости. Ознакомиться с ним можно по ссылке. Если у вас своя платформа - заходите, смотрите, добавляйтесь. Напомню про основы Союза: • Создали некоммерческое объединение, где собраны ведущие платформы рынка. Сейчас нас 12. Около 200 млрд совокупной выручки. • Формируем консолидированную позицию по регулированию отрасли, чтобы доносить запросы рынка напр…
👍10custom 54024069652529891031
Моя речь на круглом столе в Совете Федерации про создание СРО и реестра второго уровня для платформ гибкой занятости. А также открытого ценообразования для закупки аутсорсинга.
👍23custom 540240696525298910311❤5
🔥 РОССИЯ БЕЗ МИГРАНТОВ. Исследование о будущем. Вышел новый фильм-исследование. Есть, чем поделиться. Мы собрали всю базу знаний о работе в России — про линейный персонал, про рынок труда. Всё, что накоплено за 20+ лет опыта. И поняли: грех не воспользоваться современными инструментами. И оценили модели развития других стран. Мы взяли нейросети и прогнали через них этот массив. Вопрос был один: что будет, если завт…
custom 54024069652529891034❤1👍1
Похоже, чиновникам аппарата удалось продать идею наверх, и теперь мы видим активную деятельность. Но спешка нужна при ловле блох. А такая суета может привести к обратному эффекту. А как надо? А надо как в такси. Сначала всех вывести из тени в свет. Приучить к агрегатору. Сделать так, чтобы работать в цифровом контуре было проще, безопаснее и выгоднее, чем по старинке в наличку или на карту. И только потом, когда уже…
❤9👍9💯4
Шкура на кону или что обсуждали в Совете Федерации Зачитываю преамбулу кругового стола: «Особую тревогу вызывает использование многоуровневых схем, при которых конечный заказчик сохраняет полный контроль над персоналом, а формальный работодатель уклоняется от фискальной и социальной ответственности. В этой связи необходима консолидированная работа по устранению правовых пробелов и созданию стимулов для легализации. …
👍4❤3
Вчера участвовал в круглом столе на тему Теневой занятости в Совете Федерации Интересно узнать, о чем говорили?
❤15custom 54024069652529891039👍6
Кто что думает?⬆️
Минэкономразвития России уточнило критерии платформенной занятости Новости Правительство утвердило механизм, призванный сделать прозрачными отношения между заказчиками и исполнителями, работающими через посреднические цифровые платформы. Соответствующее постановление, разработанное Минэкономразвития, опубликовано на официальном интернет-портале правовой информации. Документ вводит чёткий количественный ориентир, кот…
custom 53778572027719926806❤2🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @reshanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@samozanyatiye · 73,381
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
@academylogistic · 39,099
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Денис Решанов | блог” (@reshanov), 1,369 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reshanov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.