Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Retribution Launches πŸŒ˜πŸŒ’

Channel

Retribution Launches πŸŒ˜πŸŒ’

@retributionlaunches

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

392subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002200126862
TypeChannel
Username@retributionlaunches
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/retributionlaunches

Growth

3923983957 August 2026 β€” 398 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 398 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 395 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 394 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 392 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 37 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 391–399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 16:57392-2
22 Aug 2026, 01:58394-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:27395-3
8 Aug 2026, 05:49398no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:06398first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2348.9%
πŸ”₯1327.7%
πŸ‘Œ36.38%
πŸ™36.38%
πŸ€“24.26%
πŸ‘12.13%
πŸ’Š12.13%
πŸ₯°12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 20:58 UTC372 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ton memecoins > Solana memecoins

❀7πŸ”₯7πŸ’Š1

2 Jun 2026, 11:36 UTC183 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

My first ton ride has been pretty good I’m enjoying this

❀3

2 Jun 2026, 11:35 UTC178 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bouncing back strong

❀1πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

2 Jun 2026, 11:35 UTC161 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

βœ… GTA Buy! βž–πŸ”€[v2] πŸͺ™πŸͺ™πŸͺ™ πŸ”€ 13.00 TON ($26.33) πŸ”€ 149,932.51 GTA πŸ‘€ EQD...dblIK: New!βž–Txn πŸ’΅ Price: $0.000176 πŸ’΅ MarketCap: $175,581 πŸš€ Listingβž–πŸ“ŠMZTβž–πŸ“Š Chart ad: Gram will Win

31 May 2026, 13:53 UTC124 viewsread 8 August 2026

Insuring my friends guys because I know a sender when I see one this project awoke me

31 May 2026, 13:53 UTC151 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Told my friend to buy for 500 and I’ll insure it because I know it’s a sender

❀1πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

31 May 2026, 11:12 UTC141 viewsread 8 August 2026

Riding this to the moon I always suggest taking initials at 2x but I’m not doing non of that here it just makes sense

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @retributionlaunches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œRetribution Launches πŸŒ˜πŸŒ’β€ (@retributionlaunches), 392 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/retributionlaunches.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.