Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💣Реутов SOS Новости

Channel

💣Реутов SOS Новости

@reutovsos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,413subscribers

-1,610 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001103464023
TypeChannel
Username@reutovsos
DescriptionРеутов 🆘 №1 Новости города ! ЧП РФ Связь с админом @ReutovSOS_bot Чат @reutov_chat Барахолка @reutov_doska Инста https://www.instagram.com/reutovsos ВК https://vk.ru/reutovsos Автор Ясинская Настя
Created4 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/reutovsos

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

40,41342,10741,2606 August 2026 — 42,023 subscribers6 August 2026 — 42,023 subscribers6 August 2026 — 42,024 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,107 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,073 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,055 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,045 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,032 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,021 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,559 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,576 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,583 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,565 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,552 subscribers23 August 2026 — 40,564 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,538 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,529 subscribers26 August 2026 — 40,533 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,542 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,544 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,527 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40,525 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40,528 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,518 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,511 subscribers4 September 2026 — 40,513 subscribers7 September 2026 — 40,482 subscribers10 September 2026 — 40,468 subscribers12 September 2026 — 40,452 subscribers14 September 2026 — 40,438 subscribers15 September 2026 — 40,423 subscribers18 September 2026 — 40,413 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,610. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,159–42,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:2140,413-10
15 Sept 2026, 21:5840,423-15
14 Sept 2026, 04:5740,438-14
12 Sept 2026, 13:0040,452-16
10 Sept 2026, 08:5640,468-14
7 Sept 2026, 00:3740,482-31
4 Sept 2026, 12:4240,513+2
3 Sept 2026, 01:0540,511-7
1 Sept 2026, 21:5340,518-10
31 Aug 2026, 21:4540,528+3
31 Aug 2026, 01:0440,525-2
29 Aug 2026, 21:5340,527-17
28 Aug 2026, 19:5540,544+2
27 Aug 2026, 19:3840,542+9
26 Aug 2026, 21:4640,533+4
25 Aug 2026, 20:0440,529-9
24 Aug 2026, 17:4740,538-26
23 Aug 2026, 04:1740,564+12
21 Aug 2026, 17:2540,552-13
20 Aug 2026, 13:1640,565first reading

Engagement

957 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.89%
avg views ÷ 40,413 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,190
533 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.666%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
533
of 957 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 514 of 533 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held957 (5 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total1,698,613
Reactions total11,076
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈50,700
Videos
≈22,000
Links
≈11,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 07m
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 298 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

26,923 reactions across 888 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6,89725.6%
🔥4,14315.4%
👍3,89014.4%
custom 52266352654554332202,6179.72%
🤣2,5619.51%
💯2,2878.49%
😱1,1594.30%
😁8403.12%
😭5371.99%
😢1890.702%
⚡1850.687%
🤮1500.557%
🤯1470.546%
custom 57872563931195675801180.438%
custom 60214119498986375321030.383%
custom 5980785424749039265970.36%
custom 5992062939421478211910.338%
custom 5195440875034920228760.282%
custom 5832562469821746227740.275%
🍌720.267%
22 further kinds6902.56%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 916 of the 957 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,444 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 957 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 957 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reutovsos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 957 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 19:35 UTC≈1,920 views27 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Давайте спать

🤣10❤9custom 52266352654554332206😁2

24 Sept 2026, 17:48 UTC≈3,310 views10 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Авария на Ленина в 20:30

🫡5👍3custom 52266352654554332202

24 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC≈3,190 views30 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Качаем битухи, чтобы делать блюда из тыквы

🤣19💯5custom 57875797139626433714custom 53350058673832054481custom 53459921703880706861

24 Sept 2026, 17:43 UTC≈2,910 views23 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Закат на Святом озере

❤20👍2🔥1

24 Sept 2026, 17:41 UTC≈2,800 views26 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Шум реутовского прибоя

❤23👍2🔥1

24 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC≈3,740 views16 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Золотой кошелёк кто приныкал, признавайтесь !

👍12❤2😱2

24 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC≈4,260 views42 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Не плакай, сожри кольцо и пошли нахуй

🤣38custom 53350058673832054482custom 57875797139626433712

24 Sept 2026, 13:33 UTC≈4,180 views31 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Если ваша собака сожрала носки, что делаем ?

😱14🔥9custom 52266352654554332204👍3❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 957 posts we hold for @reutovsos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@reutovsos edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Sept 2026, 19:43 UTCAnonymous Poll441 voters

🦊 Вам нравятся фуглеры ?

  1. Да27%
  2. Нет56%
  3. Я ещё не сформировал отношение к монстрам17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Poll717 voters

Гладите ли вы одежду?

  1. Нет24%
  2. Да43%
  3. Отпариваю, не глажу14%
  4. Редко глажу, по праздникам19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTCAnonymous Poll657 voters

У вас сегодня болит голова ?

  1. Да36%
  2. Нет41%
  3. Голова не болит, но спать хочется27%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 957 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Филипп Науменко | Глава Реутова
@F_Naumenko · 3,126
#1
МОЙ Реутов | События | Новости
@reutov_today · 13,643
#2
РЕУТОВ
@Gorod_Reutov · 4,072
#3
ШКОЛА 6 РЕУТОВ 🏫
@school6reutov · 608
#4
ТВ-Реутов
@tvreutov · 1,699
#5
МБОУ "СОШ 3" корпус 2 Реутов
@school2reut · 683
#6
Парки города Реутов
@parki_reutov · 2,939
#7
МАОУ «Лицей» корпус 2
@school_reutov5 · 793
#8
"СОШ 1" г. Реутов
@school1_reutov · 790
#9
ПроРеутов
@proreutov · 984
#10
Москва 24
@infomoscow24 · 486,177
#11
Москва с огоньком
@moscowtop · 381,835
#12
TerraTetra МБОУ СОШ 4 г.о.Реутов
@terratetra · 450
#13
МБОУ «СОШ N3» г.о. Реутов
@school3reutov · 612
#14
Молодая Гвардия | Реутов
@mger_reutov · 369
#15
РеутовОбр
@reutovobr · 1,893
#16
Подмосква
@podmoskow · 37,385
#17
Константин Цуриков
@Tsurikov_KV · 335
#18
Москва+
@moscowplus · 1,199,829
#19
РЕУТОВ
@Inreutov · 400
#20
Москва сегодня
@moscow · 2,655,291
#21
Московская Хроника
@mosnews · 2,478,725
#22
Кудинова Марина Александровна
@XCx_PfnLsekxYTMy · 313
#23
Mash
@mash · 3,096,804
#24
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,674,200
#25
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,111,005
#26
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903
#27
МБОУ «СОШ №7» г.Реутов
@school7reutov · 1,165
#28
Школа №10 (г. Реутов)
@school10reutovo · 2,211
#29
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,150
#30
Москва Live
@msk_live · 1,808,438
#31
МАОУ "Лицей" г. Реутов
@lyceum_reutov · 1,303
#32
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#33
«Гимназия» Реутов
@maoyGimnaziym · 601
#34
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141
#35
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,657
#36
СП ЦОПП "Энергия", г. Реутов
@spcopp · 1,607
#37
Первый Московский
@mosguru · 3,180,311
#38
Москва - это интересно
@mskint · 3,323,451
#39
Осторожно, Москва
@ostorozhno_moskva · 391,203
#40
ГБОУ Школа №1504
@school_1504 · 1,789
#41
Станислав Каторов | Глава Ленинского
@KatorovSA · 8,976
#42
НАШ САФИН
@Safin_our · 705
#43
ДЕТСКИЙ НАУКОГРАД
@dncamp · 2,619
#44
Zaмкадный правдоруб
@zamkad_pravdorub · 701
#45
под100личка
@pod100lichka · 7,153
#46
МАУ ДО «Спортивная школа «Приалит»⚽️
@prialitreutov · 1,015
#47
КСИВИКА
@ksvvsvv · 369
#48
♥️ hritankova mary ♥️
@hritankovaaas · 210
#49
Dvd
@dvdd21 · 2,178
#50
А н у ш💫
@safinaaan · 183
#51
SWERTY
@swertyy_tg · 275
#52
✨студентка лингвистического🇦🇪
@spinnenmadchen · 255
#53
DJ KAIJI
@djkaiji · 261
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Москва Лайв
@seemoscow · 32,936
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Балашиха Life
@balashikha_life · 52,425
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💣Реутов SOS Новости” (@reutovsos), 40,413 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reutovsos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.