Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روایت

Channel

روایت

@revaayat1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

698subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001221838096
TypeChannel
Username@revaayat1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/revaayat1

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6957016986 August 2026 — 700 subscribers6 August 2026 — 700 subscribers15 August 2026 — 701 subscribers21 August 2026 — 696 subscribers27 August 2026 — 695 subscribers11 September 2026 — 698 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 694–702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 22:37698+3
27 Aug 2026, 06:27695-1
21 Aug 2026, 03:26696-5
15 Aug 2026, 04:15701+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:20700no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:46700first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

363 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22261.2%
🔥5013.8%
👍3810.5%
👌226.06%
👏195.23%
😢82.20%
👎41.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC45 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پنداشتمت طبیب دردی ناخوش شدم و دوا نخوردم @revaayat1

9👍3😢1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

4 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC368 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

فایل کامل شماره‌ی سوم (پیاپی دهم) از دوره‌ی سوم نشریه‌ی تحلیل گفتمان ادبی روی سامانه رفت. مقالات این شماره را می‌توانید از لینک زیر به صورت رایگان دانلود کنید. https://lda.uok.ac.ir/issue_8068_8101.html @revaayat1

5🔥3

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

4 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC147 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

زلفش از چهره گذر کرد و به دامانش ریخت چون سیاوخش که از آتش سوزان گذرد @revaayat1

6🔥6

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

3 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC166 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

بعد از مدّت‌ها، بین کتابهایم، دوباره کتاب #درباره_عشق نظرم را جلب کرد. اولین بار که این‌کتاب را خواندم خوب به یاد دارم سال ۱۳۹۱ اولین سال تدریسم در دانشگاه بود. کتاب، مجموعه مقالاتی است از بزرگان دانشگاه‌های اروپایی که هر کدام از منظری به عشق نگریسته‌اند. بخش‌هایی از کتاب را دوباره خواندم و حیفم آمد که معرّفی نکنم. ترجمه‌ی کتاب را #آرش_نراقی انجام داده و نشر نی آن را چاپ کرده است. پیوند بین سه ضلع: زیبایی، واقعیت/ح

12👌2🔥2👏1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

1 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC246 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

آنچنان‌ کز صفر گردد رتبت اعداد بیش پایه‌ی این ناکسان از هیچ بالا رفته است #میر_معصوم_استرآبادی @revaayat1

15👍3🔥1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

31 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC279 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

گونه‌شناسی و کارکرد استعاره روایی استعاره‌های روایی را از منظر نظری آن، نمی‌توان به یک واژه یا تشبیه، محدود کرد؛ بلکه آن‌ها خود را در قالب گونه‌هایی کلان از سیر داستانی نمایان می‌کنند. به صورت کلی، می‌توان چهار گونه‌ی بنیادین در این زمینه در نظر گرفت: یک، استعاره‌ی حماسی که تاریخ را میدان جدال خیر و شر در نظر می‌گیرد و به پیروزی نهایی قهرمان می‌انجامد؛ دوم، استعاره‌ی تراژیک که بر سقوط از کمال اولیه یا فروپاشی نظم مو

11🔥2👍1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

28 Jul 2026, 02:05 UTC347 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

یار گفت: از ما بکن قطعِ نَظَر، گفتم: به چشم! گفت: قطعا هم مَبین سویِ دِگر، گفتم: به چشم! گفت یار؛ از غیر ما پوشان نظر! گفتم: به چشم! وانگهی دزدیده در ما می‌نِگر! گفتم: به چشم! گفت: با ما دوستی می‌کن به دل گفتم: به جان! گفت: راه عشق ما می‌رو به سر گفتم: به چشم ! گفت: با چشمت بگو تا در میان مردمان، سویِ ما هَر دَم نیندازد نظر ! گفتم: به چشم! گفت: اگر خواهد دلت زین لعل میگون خنده‌ای گریه‌ها می‌کن به صد خون جگر گفتم:

25👍2🔥2👌1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

27 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC284 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#استعاره_های_روایی و ادراک انسانی استعاره‌ی روایی، در نگاه اول، گونه‌ای آرایه‌ی ادبی یا پیرنگی داستانی به نظر می‌رسد که برای زیباسازی کلام به کار می‌رود؛ اما در نگرش معرفت‌شناختی معاصر -به ویژه در سنّت هرمنوتیک فلسفی و زبان‌شناسی شناختی- این مفهوم به مثابه‌ی یک طرح‌واره‌ی ادراکی بنیادین بازتعریف می‌شود که نه تنها گزارش‌دهی به وقایع، بلکه کنش فهمیدن انسان را در بستر تاریخ و جامعه امکان‌پذیر می‌سازد. مسئله‌ی اساسی، آن

10👏4🔥2👍1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

25 Jul 2026, 03:04 UTC414 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سلام بر این دَمِ باریک که میان دو نیستی محصور است؛ نیستی دیروز که دیگر نیست و نیستی فردا که هنوز نیست. یادم نیست چه کسی بود که می‌گفت نمی‌توان دو بار در یک رودخانه قدم زد. به نطر من، تلخ‌تر ان است که نمی‌توان حتی یک بار در رودخانه‌ی زمان قدم زد؛ چراکه خود قدم‌ها، خود ساحل و خود تو که به آب می‌نگری، همه در حال و در جریان‌اند. این «من» که اکنون این سطرها را می‌نویسد، همان «من»ِ آغاز جمله نیست. ما هر دَم، موجودی نو می‌

15👏4🔥2👍1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

24 Jul 2026, 01:36 UTC317 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هوای کوی تو از سر نمی‌رود آری غریب را دل سرگشته با وطن باشد #حافظ @revaayat1

19

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

22 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC335 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

امیدوارم نگاه‌های انتقادی چه تایید و چه رد مطالب گفته شده در بخش پیام‌ها به اشتراک گذاشته شود. گفتگو بهترین راه برای تداوم و تثبیت دانش است.

7👍4🔥4👎1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

22 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC367 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

در نگاه نخست، واکنش خشن جمعی به مرگ این کودک، پاسخی طبیعی به یک تهدید عینی به‌نظر می‌رسد؛ اما بررسی علمی–فلسفی این ماجرا، ناهمخوانی عمیقی را آشکار می‌کند: چرا یک حمله‌ی سگ، موجی از «خونخواهی» همگانی برمی‌انگیزد، درحالی‌که مرگ‌بارترین ساختارهای انسانی (خودرو، جنگ و خطای پزشکی) نه‌تنها واکنشی مشابه ندارند، بلکه حتی مشروعیت خود را نیز حفظ می‌کنند؟ سگ دقیقاً به دلیل «فرودست‌ترین» جایگاه در سلسله‌مراتب قدرت، هدف نخست خشم

👍115🔥4👎1

Signed Hiva hassanpoor

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @revaayat1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مــن و تــو
@sherkadaymanoto · 22,242
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روایت” (@revaayat1), 698 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revaayat1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.