Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ˚⊱reveri⊰˚

Channel

˚⊱reveri⊰˚

@reverriart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003844120537
TypeChannel
Username@reverriart
Created15 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/reverriart

Growth

676.511 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6 subscribers11 August 202631 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 20 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 06:076-1
12 Aug 2026, 19:317no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:177first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥436.4%
327.3%
🥰327.3%
👍19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

꧁༺ 𝓼𝓱𝓮 𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓴𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽 𝓪 𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓪𝓶 ༻꧂ #art #palette

6 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @PiarhydozhPhoto

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖для творчества 8,5к @piarchatartist Пиар разрешен для всего, бана нет Лучшая подборка для художника: ➡️Бесплатный пиар и арт коммьюнити 12к @piarhydozh ➡️Продвижение начинающих художников @artpiarr ➡️ Чаты самопиара ➡️Баттлы артов @otsenkaart ➡️Арт интерактивы, пиар ваших ивентов @artivent ➡️Арт коммьюнити и пиар для нсфв художников 18+ @kotenky АВТОР ОБЛОЖКИ @mamagdt

1 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zweifel444Photo

𝕹𝖊 𝖕𝖎𝖑𝖎 𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖞𝖆 𝖛𝖟𝖌𝖑𝖞𝖆𝖉𝖔𝖒 𝖘𝖛𝖔𝖎𝖒, 𝕿𝖞 𝖛𝖊𝖉 𝖘𝖆𝖒 𝖛𝖉𝖗𝖚𝖌 𝖐𝖔𝖓𝖈𝖆 𝖕𝖔𝖟𝖍𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖑. 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖔𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖞𝖞 𝖐𝖗𝖚𝖌 𝖗𝖆𝖟𝖔𝖗𝖛𝖆𝖑 𝖙𝖞 𝕾𝖑𝖔𝖛𝖔𝖒 𝖘𝖚𝖍𝖎𝖒, 𝖁𝖊𝖉 𝖒𝖔𝖎𝖍 𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖐 𝖒𝖔𝖐𝖗𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖓𝖊 𝖛𝖎𝖉𝖆𝖑. 𝖁𝖒𝖎𝖌 𝖔𝖇𝖗𝖚𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖑𝖔𝖘 𝖉𝖓𝖔 𝖚 𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖞𝖆 𝕻𝖔𝖉 𝖓𝖔𝖌𝖆𝖒𝖎, 𝕷𝖎𝖘𝖍 𝖔𝖘𝖐𝖔𝖑𝖐𝖎 𝖘𝖔𝖛𝖒𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖓𝖞𝖍 𝖁𝖔𝖘𝖕𝖔𝖒𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖞 𝕶𝖗𝖔𝖛𝖞𝖆 𝖛 𝖒𝖔𝖊𝖞 𝖐𝖔𝖟𝖍𝖊 - 𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖚𝖙 𝕽𝖚𝖇𝖈𝖆𝖒𝖎. 𝕹𝖆𝖛𝖊𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖔 𝖐𝖑𝖊𝖞𝖒𝖔𝖒 𝖓𝖊𝖑𝖊𝖕𝖞𝖍 𝕿𝖊𝖟𝖗𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖞. наконец-то дошли силы закончить этот автопортрет 🫩🫩 120 часов из-за своей лени его рисовала репостики пожалуйста 🌹

29 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC31 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

я, если что, не забросила 𝄞 #art #WIP

25 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC39 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

°+*:ꔫ:*+゚ коллаб с этим НАИЧУДЕСНЕЙШИМ человечком! кликабельно #collab #art

25 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @shizukaa_228Photo

.𖥔 ݁♫ Набор на палитры.𖥔 ݁♫ 🐙: Суть ивента: нарисовать работу в выбранной вами палитре.. જ⁀➴Условия: 1) подписка на @shizukaa_228 2) репост к себе в тгк/в пиар чат по желанию 3) кинуть свою анкету Анкета: • ваш юз • ссылка на тгк • номер палитры, которую хотите • несколько примеров работ и пруф репоста Места в палитре: 1) 0/8 2) 0/8 3) 2/8 4) 1/8 Дедлайн на отрисовку работы — 3 недели Набор до 1 августа .𖥔 ݁˖П

25 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ отзыв уже на месте! #commission #art

23 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC33 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Antonella Marifiardet 🏵🇨🇴 for she !! #art #request

1👍1🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC32 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

активно думаю над дизайном маскота.. удивительно, что в диджитал... #art #WIP

🔥2🥰21

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @reverriart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˚⊱reveri⊰˚” (@reverriart), 6 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reverriart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.