Купил кфг под нт,выебал пбшку,обошёл прову по его способу +rep @relone666
Channel
reviews by relone
@reviewscl3wr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003841522663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reviewscl3wr |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reviewscl3wr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 9 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 8 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
2 раз покупаю все хорошо без скама
+rep все есть покупайте
Все сяб лучший не скамер лучший чел кфг relone буст
Все четко, быстро ответили на все вопросы, который были
купил приватку быстро не скам
Конфиг норм но если правильно пользоваться то он будет все шатать
Купил кфг у @relone666 пиздато пенит пошел кв с Кентом у которого проджект всоснул мне
ебнутый кфг, пенит нормально, не скам
@relone666 ахуеный кофнфмг перебивает проджект юзеров
Все четко, быстро +реп @relone666
Все хорошо прошло не скам
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reviewscl3wr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“reviews by relone” (@reviewscl3wr), 9 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reviewscl3wr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.