Channel
@revolution_witches
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001553107377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @revolution_witches |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/revolution_witches |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 21 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 22 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 22 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 7 | 29.2% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 25.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Порой так много хочется сказать человеку, но ты не можешь. Просто не можешь. Нет, ты не трус. Ты просто человек, который зависит от своих эмоций. И это не плохо. Тебе просто нужно немного времени, чтобы собраться с мыслями воедино. Ты не всесилен и это нормально. Ты человек. Ты чувствуешь, ты понимаешь, ты ощущаешь. Ты живёшь этими эмоциями. И в этом нет ничего неправильного.
❤2
Posted without readable text
А вот и летний челлендж подъехал. Первая глава "Пламя между мирами"
На канале с подкастами, новый подкаст. Кому интересно - Велком ту!
Channel photo updated
Летний челлендж (будут дополняться ссылки каждую неделю, сначала отдельным постом, потом сюда). ПРЕДУПРЕЖДАЮ: Писатель из меня так себе, но надеюсь, что это не сильно ужасно!! Что-то писалось по книгам, будет помечено, что-то по мультфильмам, тоже будет помечено, а что-то чисто мои идеи. 📖 Чернила и Кровь, аушка. 📖 Спи, милый принц. Первая часть. Вторая часть. Третья часть. четвертая часть. 📖Эпилог, "Чернила и Кров…
Быть опорой и поддержкой для сестры - для меня самое важное. Она знает, что я ценю её. Она знает, что я люблю её. И она знает, что я всегда поддержу её! Цените своих родных и близких. Ведь они - самое важное, что есть в наших жизнях! 🫶🏻
❤2🎉1🔥1
Пока ты не нравишься себе - не имеет смысла думать о том, как ты выглядишь в глазах других.
❤🔥2
Не за что, душа моя 😘
❤2
НАСТЁНААААААААААА 😭😭😭😭😭😭😢😢 СПАСИБО
💋2
Вчера был день рождения моего дорогого Кёнушки. Моей души. У меня не дошли руки поздравить тебя лично или написать стих, но я хочу исправить это сейчас. Хотя стихи разучилась писать, но я старалась) Душа моя, ты так прекрасен. Из года в год тобой горжусь я. Мне так приятно знать, что сияешь ты сейчас! Желаю тебе и дальше быть столь прекрасным, благородным и счастливым. Чтоб проблем всё меньше было, а любимые дела п…
❤🔥2💋1💔1
она говорит, что ты ей «нравишься», но у неё нет твоего фото в галерее, ты не стоишь у неё на обоях, она не знает, что тебе нравится, и не запоминает мелочи о тебе она не думает о тебе перед сном, её подруги не устают от разговоров о тебе — потому что этих разговоров нет она не представляет вас вместе, не строит в голове «а что если», не ищет тебя в случайных людях она не тянется написать первой, не ловит твои соо…
💔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @revolution_witches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@revolution_witches named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Révolution des sorcières” (@revolution_witches), 21 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revolution_witches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.