Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ﹫ ⋮ 𝗥𝗜𝓫b𝗜𝗧 ₊ ꒱

Channel

﹫ ⋮ 𝗥𝗜𝓫b𝗜𝗧 ₊ ꒱

@ribbit_laughnet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003906706217
TypeChannel
Username@ribbit_laughnet
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 14 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ribbit_laughnet

Growth

212623.510 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23 subscribers10 September 2026 — 21 subscribers10 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 17:2021-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:2423-3
18 Aug 2026, 08:4226+2
11 Aug 2026, 11:1824no change
10 Aug 2026, 21:4624first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53912231238173053492135.6%
custom 52897607534468293411322.0%
custom 52065817023731832181118.6%
custom 6005747594284768522711.9%
58.47%
custom 531691270776346411611.69%
custom 539129213105685136511.69%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC33 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌🤩🌟🌟🌟ANON🤩 🥹🥹🤩💕🔹🌟☦️: 🌟🌟 🤩.после взаимного ответа на ее действия, та совсем поплыла. в низу живота все перевернулось. лягуха уже довольно давно начала замечать, что стала смотреть по-другому на своего друга – засранца и, кто бы мог подумать, что это может быть взаимно. ❌чувствуя чужие губы, которые слегка приоткрылись, пользуется моментом и решает углубить поцелуй. рука, которая была сплетена с его, перемещается на п

custom 53912231238173053493custom 52065817023731832182custom 60057475942847685222custom 52897607534468293411

22 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC41 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌🤩🌟🌟🌟ANON🤩 🥹🥹🤩💕🔹🌟☦️: 🌟🌟 🤩.сердце замирает, как только он приближается. но не успевает она и опомниться, как тот тут же отстраняется. вновь слышит эти тупые шутки, которые уже невыносимы. глядя на нее, складывается ощущение, что она щас ему врежет, да так хорошенько, чтоб он запомнил это навсегда. чтоб наконец понял, что она чувствует. но вместо этого лягуха лишь сверлит его взглядом несколько секунд, а после притяги

custom 539122312381730534943custom 52897607534468293413custom 52065817023731832181

22 Jul 2026, 00:03 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌🤩🌟🌟🌟ANON🤩 🥹🥹🤩💕🔹🌟☦️: 🌟🌟 🤩.наконец она смогла выдохнуть. все не так плохо, как могло показаться на первый взгляд. так полегчало, будто с плеч спал огромный груз. наконец та приходит в себя и говорит более привычным для нее тоном ❌–а если так🌟 лягуха тянется еще ближе и останавливается возле ушей кролика, при этом продолжая поглаживать его руку. ❌– мне все еще надо быть лучше? сладко шепчет она ему на ухо. пару мгно

1custom 52065817023731832181custom 52897607534468293411custom 53912231238173053491

21 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌🤩🌟🌟🌟ANON🤩 🥹🥹🤩💕🔹🌟☦️: 🌟🌟 🤩.девчонка сидит смирно, не двигается, дает просто привыкнуть. изучает взглядом своего друга, боясь спугнуть. кажется, что любое лишнее действие и кролик отвернется навсегда, посчитает это глупым и больше не захочет ее видеть. слышит чужие слова, от чего на душе становится чуть легче, так что позволяет себе пропустить нежную улыбку и немного сжать их пальцы. они сидят так пару минут, просто с

custom 52065817023731832182custom 52897607534468293412custom 53912231238173053492custom 60057475942847685222

20 Jul 2026, 22:41 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌🤩🌟🌟🌟ANON🤩 🥹🥹🤩💕🔹🌟☦️: 🌟🌟 🤩.как же это неловко. рибб уже не знала, куда себя деть. неожидала она, что говорить такое будет так сложно. лишь бы все было хорошо. та совсем не хотела ссориться, или же давить на джекса, она ведь видит - он еще не готов. "может.. в следующий раз?" проносится у нее в мыслях. слушается свой внутренний голос и решает не торопить своего лучшего друга. ❌осмеливается лишь сплести их мизинцы, в з

1custom 52065817023731832181custom 52897607534468293411custom 53912231238173053491

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ribbit_laughnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“﹫ ⋮ 𝗥𝗜𝓫b𝗜𝗧 ₊ ꒱” (@ribbit_laughnet), 21 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ribbit_laughnet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.