Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РИЧ

Channel

РИЧ

@rich_triphop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

6,733subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517102404
TypeChannel
Username@rich_triphop
Created6 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rich_triphop

Growth

6,7336,7606,746.56 August 2026 — 6,760 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,760 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,757 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,756 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,757 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,754 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,749 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,745 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,744 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,743 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,739 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,733 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 32 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,729–6,764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 04:576,733-6
2 Sept 2026, 22:256,739-4
31 Aug 2026, 06:446,743-1
28 Aug 2026, 08:466,744-1
25 Aug 2026, 14:246,745-4
22 Aug 2026, 21:566,749-5
19 Aug 2026, 06:386,754-3
16 Aug 2026, 06:086,757+1
13 Aug 2026, 02:076,756-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:116,757-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:206,760no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:196,760first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.87%
avg views ÷ 6,733 subscribers
Avg views / post
530
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held15 (4 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total530
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC≈8,110 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Спустя два года концертного затишья возвращаюсь с новой программой. Будет много свежего и неожиданного. Рад буду всех видеть, отметим красивые цифры и бодро проведем время. До встречи! БИЛЕТЫ

29 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @golosbooksPhoto

Друзья! Вновь в продаже книга публицистики Ричарда Семашкова "Пойдём поговорим". На этот раз — с автографом Рича. Налетай!

29 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Два года не давал сольных концертов. Осенью прерву молчание. ДОНАТ

28 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Готовим ещё одну любопытную совместную песню на злобу дня.

27 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC≈7,290 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мой подельник художник Дмитрий Провоторов открыл новую студию и возобновил работу с амбротипами. Пишите в личку.

24 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Не дождались от вас ответа и начали работать над совместным материалом.

23 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Тираж «Климки в деревне» раскуплен, а «Климку в городе» пока ещё можно приобрести — торопитесь. Купить книгу: ГОРОДЕЦ ОЗОН ВБ

23 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,950 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Наш новый сингл "Брат уходит на войну" в "Настоящем хит-параде". ГОЛОСОВАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ

22 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Да, ты на коне, но это хоббихорсинг. Ты графоман, скорей всего, если тебя все форсят. Де Ниро больше не таксист, Бодров к вам едет в гости, Из Кремля звонят весь день, я что-то заподозрил. Моя жизнь — это имиджевый ход. Кто просил русский стиль — он вот. В домофоне набрал русский код, Мне открыли, это был чёрный вход. Мы не простили — они сгубили Хэма. Ты за Селинджера или за Леннона? Ты расправил плечи, но мне по ко

21 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В Питере один. Без детей. Скучаю.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rich_triphop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Екатерина Агранович
@kaagranovich · 36,006
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Юлия Чичерина
@julia_chicherina · 43,858
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Аким Апачев☀️ 🏹
@akimapachev · 47,988
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Долгарева • Река Смородина
@dolgarevaanna · 28,675
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q124768934 on Wikidata, read 6 September 2026
LabelNo label recorded on this Wikidata item

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Oyda (song) (en.wikipedia.org)
“…all the media existing in Russia".{{Cite web |title=РИЧ |url=https://t.me/rich_triphop/455 |access-date=2022-09-18 |website=Telegram}}{{Cite…”
read 23 August 2026
Ойда (песня) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…все, просто все существующие в России медиа»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/rich_triphop/455|title=РИЧ|website=Telegram|access-date=2022-09-18|archi…”
read 23 August 2026
Ойда (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…«рекомендують всі, просто всі медіа, що існують у Росії»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/rich_triphop/455|title=РИЧ|website=Telegram|access-date=2022-09-18}}{{Cite…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РИЧ” (@rich_triphop), 6,733 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rich_triphop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.