Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sasha WAVES.

Channel

Sasha WAVES.

@rideonwaves

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

751,868subscribers

-184,758 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002283223405
TypeChannel
Username@rideonwaves
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 4 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rideonwaves

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

751,868936,626844,2476 August 2026 — 936,626 subscribers6 August 2026 — 935,532 subscribers7 August 2026 — 933,471 subscribers8 August 2026 — 930,766 subscribers9 August 2026 — 928,624 subscribers10 August 2026 — 926,191 subscribers11 August 2026 — 923,356 subscribers12 August 2026 — 920,436 subscribers13 August 2026 — 919,459 subscribers14 August 2026 — 917,157 subscribers16 August 2026 — 914,061 subscribers17 August 2026 — 910,886 subscribers18 August 2026 — 908,287 subscribers19 August 2026 — 905,246 subscribers20 August 2026 — 904,237 subscribers21 August 2026 — 901,686 subscribers23 August 2026 — 897,557 subscribers25 August 2026 — 893,348 subscribers25 August 2026 — 891,445 subscribers26 August 2026 — 889,430 subscribers28 August 2026 — 888,031 subscribers28 August 2026 — 885,997 subscribers29 August 2026 — 883,394 subscribers31 August 2026 — 880,884 subscribers1 September 2026 — 878,343 subscribers2 September 2026 — 875,740 subscribers3 September 2026 — 872,541 subscribers4 September 2026 — 868,782 subscribers7 September 2026 — 861,517 subscribers10 September 2026 — 854,896 subscribers12 September 2026 — 851,160 subscribers14 September 2026 — 847,287 subscribers16 September 2026 — 843,755 subscribers18 September 2026 — 839,625 subscribers2 October 2026 — 813,905 subscribers7 October 2026 — 804,326 subscribers11 October 2026 — 796,766 subscribers14 October 2026 — 791,987 subscribers15 October 2026 — 789,688 subscribers16 October 2026 — 787,305 subscribers17 October 2026 — 785,219 subscribers18 October 2026 — 783,602 subscribers19 October 2026 — 781,211 subscribers19 October 2026 — 779,581 subscribers20 October 2026 — 777,329 subscribers22 October 2026 — 775,624 subscribers22 October 2026 — 773,070 subscribers24 October 2026 — 771,518 subscribers24 October 2026 — 769,641 subscribers25 October 2026 — 768,631 subscribers26 October 2026 — 766,640 subscribers28 October 2026 — 764,280 subscribers29 October 2026 — 761,513 subscribers30 October 2026 — 760,162 subscribers31 October 2026 — 757,689 subscribers1 November 2026 — 755,366 subscribers2 November 2026 — 753,508 subscribers3 November 2026 — 751,868 subscribers6 August 20263 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -184,758. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 724,154–964,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 02:59751,868-1,640
2 Nov 2026, 05:08753,508-1,858
1 Nov 2026, 06:36755,366-2,323
31 Oct 2026, 08:17757,689-2,473
30 Oct 2026, 11:27760,162-1,351
29 Oct 2026, 07:50761,513-2,767
28 Oct 2026, 02:21764,280-2,360
26 Oct 2026, 23:15766,640-1,991
25 Oct 2026, 23:26768,631-1,010
24 Oct 2026, 21:31769,641-1,877
24 Oct 2026, 00:51771,518-1,552
22 Oct 2026, 23:46773,070-2,554
22 Oct 2026, 01:08775,624-1,705
20 Oct 2026, 23:17777,329-2,252
19 Oct 2026, 23:41779,581-1,630
19 Oct 2026, 03:10781,211-2,391
18 Oct 2026, 03:57783,602-1,617
17 Oct 2026, 05:26785,219-2,086
16 Oct 2026, 06:28787,305-2,383
15 Oct 2026, 06:46789,688first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTC≈11,800 viewsread 3 November 2026

https://github.com/sasha52653/multi-model-debate/blob/main/docs/PAPER.md are 3 LLM"s better than 1? yeah, kind of

16 Jun 2026, 15:22 UTC≈8,890 viewsread 3 November 2026

Openweight models consensus is as good as Opus. Throw Opus into the mix and probably you'll have Fable. https://github.com/sasha52653/multi-model-debate Multi-model consensus skill for claude/hermes.

17 Apr 2026, 12:56 UTC≈13,100 viewsread 3 November 2026

we achieved AGI lol. Why weren't you thinking though :)

12 Apr 2026, 06:05 UTC≈8,080 viewsread 3 November 2026

Христос воскресе из мертвых, смертию смерть поправ!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rideonwaves. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

5 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

github.com2 posts · 16 June 2026 – 17 June 2026 · example post
medium.com1 post · 5 March 2026 – 5 March 2026 · example post
sasha35625.substack.comregistrable domain: substack.com1 post · 7 April 2026 – 7 April 2026 · example post
substack.com1 post · 6 March 2026 – 6 March 2026 · example post
x.com1 post · 22 March 2026 – 22 March 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sasha WAVES.” (@rideonwaves), 751,868 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rideonwaves.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.