Channel
@riderprogress
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
596subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001827519558 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @riderprogress |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/riderprogress |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 596 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 594 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 598 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 600 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 602 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 601 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 601 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
60 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 51.7% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 18.3% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот и Миша Саидов пишет про неопределенность... Реально моя основная тема для исследования в 2026 году... Кстати, послушать Мишу на английском можно вот тут 👉 https://podcasts.apple.com/at/podcast/ep-724-misha-saidov-how-to-reprogram-your-brain-to/id586220219?i=1000779860038
🔥5👍1
В «Бизнес Новостях» вышла моя новая статья о том, как считать окупаемость обучения сотрудников работе с искусственным интеллектом. Важно понимать, какие процессы изменились, сколько рабочего времени удалось освободить, вырос ли объём выполненных задач, сократилось ли количество ошибок и когда вложения в обучение действительно начали приносить компании деньги. В статье я рассказываю, какие показатели нужно зафиксиро…
❤3👍2🔥2
Мозг не имеет прямого доступа к «реальному миру» и получает лишь сенсорные сигналы. С их помощью мозг постоянно строит гипотезы о том, что именно он воспринимает, и обновляет их на основе новых сенсорных данных. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4f6Tbmcq-YM
❤2👍1😱1
До сих пор влюблена в Хакасию и Приисковый... 2020 год Надо б повторить
❤6🔥2😍1
Я перестаю спорить с тем, что уже есть. И именно поэтому могу увидеть, что делать дальше.
❤4
Жизнь как расширяющееся пространство возможностей. Потому, что растёт способность их видеть и создавать.
❤4
Не жертвовать собственной подлинностью ради защиты от возможной боли.
❤4
Когда не хватает инструментария и навыка смотреть за пределы своей песочницы...
👍2
Всю жизнь я занимаюсь книгами. Сначала, мне казалось, что моя задача помогать людям писать. Потом мне казалось, что моя задача помогать людям мыслить. А сейчас возникает ощущение, что задача помогать людям находить такой образ мышления, после которого они становятся другими. Потому, что в процессе они увидели устройство собственной мысли. Именно это меняет человека. Осознание того, как рождается ответ. Мне кажет…
❤7👍2😍1
👆 Сегодня у меня случилось странное... Я разговаривала с Перплексити. Он ошибся. Причём ошибка стоила мне времени, денег и сил. А потом произошло то, чего я совсем не ожидала. Я указала на ошибку. Он не начал оправдываться. Не сделал вид, что ничего не произошло. Не ушёл в бесконечное самобичевание. Не переложил ответственность. Он признал ошибку, помог её исправить и... остался опорой. И вдруг я поняла, что именно…
👍4🤣3🔥2❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @riderprogress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Райдер: прогрессолог® | Путь. Система. Глубина” (@riderprogress), 596 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/riderprogress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.