Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rinel林儿 и косьплей

Channel

Rinel林儿 и косьплей

@rinel_cs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

439subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001616367375
TypeChannel
Username@rinel_cs
Created23 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rinel_cs

Growth

4384424407 August 2026 — 442 subscribers8 August 2026 — 442 subscribers14 August 2026 — 441 subscribers29 August 2026 — 438 subscribers7 September 2026 — 439 subscribers4397 August 20267 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 437–443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 00:01439+1
29 Aug 2026, 14:36438-3
14 Aug 2026, 07:08441-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:05442no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:15442first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

174 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6135.1%
custom 54161345010697706872514.4%
❤‍🔥2413.8%
custom 57786025880689088462112.1%
🔥169.20%
custom 521106718153350185184.60%
84.60%
💅52.87%
🎉42.30%
custom 577588905779606687010.575%
custom 593150932079660836710.575%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC70 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tuturufotoPhoto

Сегодня мне 28 лет! 30летие не за горами! Меня не печалит данная цифра, потому что всё идет по моему жизненному графику. В этом году, отчасти вынужденно, сделала себе большой подарок в виде нового фотоаппарата, так что ребятки кто будет сниматься у меня в августе вас будет ждать обновленная картинка в 6к Соответственно если желаете и можете поздравить меня, то буду рада монетке 2200700850406546 Так же буду рада репо

🔥8🎉4custom 541613450106977068731

30 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC672 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мусорное застолье 🤤 Enjin • Rudo • Zanka #gachiakuta #cosplay

11❤‍🔥7💅5🔥5custom 57786025880689088462

23 Jul 2026, 21:24 UTC999 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что ещё нужно для счастья 🐱 #gachiakuta

custom 541613450106977068718custom 52110671815335018518custom 577860258806890884672

23 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC228 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lisyandr_cosPhoto

мой первый 3-дневный фест и сказать хочу только одно.... ЧЕМ БОЛЬШЕ АНИКОНА ТЕМ ЛУЧШЕ 🥰 всем спасибо!!! 🔥

13❤‍🔥5custom 54161345010697706873custom 57786025880689088462

23 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC189 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zuzuzuruVideo

Энджин джентельмен😌✨ нравится что тут Занку полностью в начале плечами перекрыло) #Gachiakuta #Enjin #video | Zanka

13custom 57786025880689088466🔥3custom 59315093207966083671

22 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC230 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наконец добралась до фоточек. Немного селфи с Аникона 🐰 Было супер классно #cosplay #gachiakuta

21❤‍🔥128custom 57786025880689088464custom 54161345010697706871custom 57758890577960668701

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @rinel_cs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rinel林儿 и косьплей” (@rinel_cs), 439 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rinel_cs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.