Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рисковик

Channel

Рисковик

@riskovik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,396subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188618283
TypeChannel
Username@riskovik
Created14 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/riskovik

Growth

8,3968,4298,412.55 August 2026 — 8,429 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,429 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,428 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,421 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,416 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,411 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,407 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,405 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,407 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,408 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,405 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,401 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,396 subscribers5 August 202610 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,391–8,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 08:198,396-5
5 Sept 2026, 05:578,401-4
1 Sept 2026, 05:378,405-3
29 Aug 2026, 08:128,408+1
26 Aug 2026, 05:168,407+2
23 Aug 2026, 04:588,405-2
19 Aug 2026, 12:528,407-4
16 Aug 2026, 02:128,411-5
12 Aug 2026, 16:348,416-5
9 Aug 2026, 14:218,421-7
6 Aug 2026, 13:258,428-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:028,429no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:158,429first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 25 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 8,396 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.095%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held25 (25 March 202628 August 2026)
Views total5,522
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩2432.9%
1013.7%
🤡811.0%
🤮811.0%
🖕79.59%
🎉22.74%
👏22.74%
🤣22.74%
🤨22.74%
🤬22.74%
11.37%
💊11.37%
😍11.37%
😱11.37%
🤝11.37%
🤷11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC608 viewsread 28 August 2026

​Топовые рисковики из ВТБ, Сбера, Альфа-Банка, ПСБ, Газпромбанка и др. компаний выступят на Форуме риск-менеджеров, который пройдет 22 сентября в Москве. Уникальная «фишка» этого форума — сразу три круглых стола про модельный риск, залоговый портфель и оперриски, где участники смогут пообщаться со спикерами в формате живой дискуссии. В числе спикеров: 💰 Данил Трофимов, зам. руководителя Департамента интегрированн

27 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC704 viewsread 28 August 2026

В июле 2026 года как минимум 152 российских банка зафиксировали снижение объема средств физлиц на срочных депозитах. Месяцем ранее, в июне, чистый отток со вкладов наблюдался у 138 игроков, а в мае — у 134. Сопоставимые показатели фиксировались только в ноябре 2025 года (154 банка) и в июне 2024 года (197 банков).

20 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,430 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

По отчетности МСФО по итогам первого полугодия 2026 года крупнейшие банки нарастили портфели автокредитов. В пятерке крупнейших в данном сегменте объем ссуд значительно увеличили Сбербанк (рост на 41%, до 829 млрд руб.) и группа «Т-Технологии» (Т-Банк, на 35%, до 790,2 млрд руб.). В результате Сбербанк впервые с конца третьего квартала 2025 года обогнал Т-Банк и занял первое место по размеру автокредитного портфеля

👏1

17 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,300 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Известия: За январь – август 2026-го банки закрыли 1370 дополнительных офисов, следует из данных ЦБ, Сопоставимого по масштабу падения показателя за первые восемь месяцев в последние годы не было (максимум — 894 офиса в 2021-м). Кредитные организации заметно ускорили сокращение сети на фоне перехода клиентов в цифровые каналы. Больше всего отделений банки закрыли по итогам 2021 и 2022 годов — 1588 и 1631 соответств

😱1

14 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC≈1,480 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

За июль 2026 года объём наличных денег в обращении вырос на впечатляющие 643,4 миллиарда рублей. Это на 43,1% больше, чем в июне, и абсолютный рекорд за последние шесть лет. С начала года россияне и компании вывели из финансовой системы уже более 2,5 триллионов рублей. Три главные причины, почему люди снимают наличные: 1. Сбои в безналичной оплате — наличные как страховка Начиная с весны 2025 года мобильный инте

1🤝1

24 Jun 2026, 13:58 UTC≈2,520 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Михаил Полубояринов, возглавлявший «Аэрофлот» с ноября 2020 г. по апрель 2022 г., стал фигурантом расследования уголовного дела. 60-летнему топ-менеджеру предъявлено обвинение в злоупотреблении полномочиями, дело возбуждено следственной частью Главного следственного управления ГУ МВД по Москве. 19 июня Тверской районный суд Москвы по ходатайству следствия отправил Полубояринова под стражу на два месяца. Дело может

😍1

19 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,610 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ЦБ снизил ключевую ставку до 14,25% с 14,5% годовых.

🤮71👏1💊1🤡1

11 Jun 2026, 16:08 UTC≈2,890 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Эксперт: Российский банковский сектор с 2022 г. претерпел качественную трансформацию: на смену классической модели присутствия иностранцев, в том числе в рознице, пришел «прагматичный банкинг» — обслуживание трансграничных траншей, клиринга и торговли в нацвалютах. Финансовые структуры Китая и Индии пришли на смену западным игрокам. Пока одни банки, такие как UniCredit, сворачивают бизнес, другие — получают лакомые

1🤮1

11 Jun 2026, 08:21 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 28 August 2026

Подготовленный Еврокомиссией (ЕК) 21-й пакет ограничительных мер ЕС против России включит 31 банк, заявила председатель ЕК Урсула фон дер Ляйен. "Мы распространяем наши санкции еще на 31 другой банк и на 20 банков, криптокомпаний или платформ и нефтяных брокеров в третьих странах", - сказала фон дер Ляйен во вторник в Брюсселе в заявлении для прессы. После утверждения 21-го пакета санкций Еврокомиссией он поступит

3 Jun 2026, 06:47 UTC≈2,860 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

В России снизилась долговая нагрузка населения. Этому способствовало охлаждение рынка розничного кредитования. Долговая нагрузка россиян снизилась до минимума с 2019 года. По данным ЦБ, доля располагаемых доходов населения, которая направляется на платежи по кредитам, к началу года составила 9,1%. По данным агентства «Эксперт РА», по итогам 2025 года выдачи потребкредитов в России сократились на 4,6%. Из поданных з

🤣1

2 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 28 August 2026

«Группа Лента» покупает ООО «РФБ-Ритейл» — оператора одной из ведущих в России сети гипермаркетов «О’КЕЙ». Сделка структурирована без денежной составляющей: «Группа Лента» принимает на себя долговые обязательства приобретаемой компании в качестве оплаты за 100% долей.

29 May 2026, 07:13 UTC≈2,640 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Акционеры МКБ одобрили реорганизацию в форме присоединения «Дальневосточного банка», следует из раскрытия информации компании. Цена выкупа акций у несогласных акционеров МКБ установлена на уровне 10,35 рубля за одну обыкновенную акцию. Уставный капитал МКБ при этом увеличен на 1,475 млрд руб. за счет размещения 1,475 млрд обыкновенных акций (номиналом 1 рубль) путем конвертации 10,086 млн обыкновенных и 0,359 млн при

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @riskovik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кот Эльвиры
@KotElviry · 48,022
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
В найме норм!
@Vnaime_norm · 81,356
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рисковик” (@riskovik), 8,396 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/riskovik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.