诈骗的其他的人的图别给我发问我有没有,假图我上哪里有嘛😢你哪里看的问哪里就好了😂

Channel
日照李寻欢《修车品茶榜》
@rizhao568
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28,848subscribers
+13,074 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001212374312 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rizhao568 |
| Description | 日照最全最广最专业龙头一手靠谱资源🐉 https://t.me/tanhuaxiuchedui |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rizhao568 |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 28,848 | +1,617 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 27,231 | +1,212 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 26,019 | +330 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 25,689 | +322 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:42 | 25,367 | +312 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 25,055 | +236 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 24,819 | +1,295 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 23,524 | +1,309 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 22,215 | +535 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 21,680 | +225 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:33 | 21,455 | +281 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 21,174 | +109 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 21,065 | +104 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 20,961 | +238 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 20,723 | +377 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 20,346 | +223 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 20,123 | +371 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 19,752 | +332 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 19,420 | +219 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 19,201 | first reading |
Engagement
195 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.16%
- avg views ÷ 28,848 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 333
- 78 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 78
- of 195 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 195 (6 August 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 26,012 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,950
- Videos
- ≈85
- Links
- ≈619
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 42s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#莒县_探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红) 【验证妹妹】:大学生 【人照几成】:8 【目测年纪】:21 【简评总结】:🐻大,水多,滑嫩,口活一流。 【最终评分】:9 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#日照石臼_探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(黑榜) 【验证妹妹】:此女下架不再安排 【人照几成】:人照不符 【目测年纪】: 32 【简评总结】: 人还行,挺健谈。技术服务直接不行,捏龙根撸,跟她说捏龙根撸不硬,让弄头,乱撸一通,让口硬再做,口得加钱,给加钱了,给戴套口,口硬了,做的时候俩手捂着B做,直接给哥们无语了,一直捂着B,直接做的没感觉软了,让再口硬,不口,最终自己撸出来的。 【最终评分】:拉到底了,白搭 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6713639076
#莒县_探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红榜) 【验证妹妹】:莒县学生 【人照几成】:7 【目测年纪】: 20 【简评总结】:年轻,奶子都还很挺,服务不如少妇 【最终评分】:7 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 ——————————————— 😝【探花群】【反馈榜】 【spa商K】 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#日照探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红) 【验证妹妹】:娇娇 【人照几成】:78分像 【简评总结】:开门就要抱抱情趣衣漏出来了都,太热情了盛情难却啊,太上皇的体验👍 【最终评分】:这服务加态度没得说,捧高高的,和她说了晚上再来必须再来一发 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#莒县_探花郎君真实上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红榜) 【验证艺名】: 莒县学生 【人照几成】: 9 【目测年纪】: 20 【过程报告】: 9 【简评总结】: 9 【最终评分】: 9 日照新鲜真实报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑 专业靠谱🫡 大家问题认真对待改进势做行业终点🏁 ——————————————— 😝【探花群】【反馈榜】 【spa商K】 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#日照探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红) 【验证妹妹】:兮兮(白虎🐯) 【人照几成】:7 【目测年纪】: 28 【简评总结】:服务和态度没得说,过程很温柔,没有口音,还给加项目了,人照不太一样,可以接受。 【最终评分】:90 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#日照探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红榜) 【验证妹妹】:茜茜 【人照几成】:反正挺好看的 【目测年纪】: 25左右 【简评总结】:带派 【最终评分】:9 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 ——————————————— 😝【探花群】【反馈榜】 【spa商K】 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#日照上门_探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红榜上门) 【验证妹妹】:安妮 【人照几成】:不是一人(本人175左右,体重大概50不到,颜值给到85分) 【目测年纪】: 19 【简评总结】:特别年轻她说她是08年的,给口,也给🐍吻,她过来也不戴几个套套,还好酒店有,她说可以无套不收费(这个大家还是安全一点建议带套)多收了50车费,喜欢年轻高个的可以冲刺了,逼嫩,毛少,🐻不大 【最终评分】:89 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#莒县_探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红) 【验证妹妹】:小石 【人照几成】:不是实照但是很漂亮 【目测年纪】: 26-28 【简评总结】:800元档的服务很周到列的都有做胸推指滑口👅做的很好不敷衍反馈不错 【最终评分】:9 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 ——————————————— 😝【探花群】【反馈榜】 【spa商K】 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
#日照探花郎君真实出勤上榜反馈 李寻欢独家首发黑红榜之(红) 【验证妹妹】:小k 【人照几成】:8 【目测年纪】:22 【简评总结】:很嫩,有符文这个是一个加分项,服务还是有点生疏,这就需要各位老司机调教调教 【最终评分】:98 日照狼友日记真实靠谱出击报告反馈🔥 真实评价不吹不黑!反馈保真假赔万🫡 注: 报告仅供参考,各有所好 众口难调 😀【见面付款🍑安全靠谱🍑约妓首选】 ———————————————— 🥰日照探花郎客服|👍 双向私机器人 ❤️山东探花郎李寻欢修车🏁行业标杆店【日照/岚山/莒县/五莲/龙头一手真实靠谱资源】😄
Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @rizhao568. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“日照李寻欢《修车品茶榜》” (@rizhao568), 28,848 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rizhao568.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.