Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net +105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,416–6,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 00:58
6,538
+4
3 Nov 2026, 23:06
6,534
+2
1 Nov 2026, 07:39
6,532
-4
29 Oct 2026, 11:56
6,536
+4
26 Oct 2026, 07:41
6,532
-17
23 Oct 2026, 03:08
6,549
+12
19 Oct 2026, 21:10
6,537
+1
17 Oct 2026, 03:09
6,536
+6
13 Oct 2026, 20:30
6,530
+10
8 Oct 2026, 13:21
6,520
+4
2 Oct 2026, 09:38
6,516
-4
16 Sept 2026, 08:21
6,520
+2
12 Sept 2026, 10:38
6,518
+3
7 Sept 2026, 22:38
6,515
-1
2 Sept 2026, 15:55
6,516
-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:38
6,520
+15
27 Aug 2026, 15:59
6,505
+13
24 Aug 2026, 18:48
6,492
+6
21 Aug 2026, 07:13
6,486
+16
18 Aug 2026, 14:24
6,470
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 6,538 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
68 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
32,258
Reactions total
1,969
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,390
Videos
≈683
Links
≈4,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 56s
Average length
3m 28s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,302 reactions across 57 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,595
37.1%
🔥
955
22.2%
👎
288
6.69%
💯
285
6.62%
❤
254
5.90%
🤬
232
5.39%
🤡
211
4.90%
🤣
100
2.32%
😱
88
2.05%
😁
68
1.58%
❤🔥
47
1.09%
🤯
39
0.907%
😡
21
0.488%
💩
19
0.442%
🕊
16
0.372%
🤔
15
0.349%
🤝
10
0.232%
😨
9
0.209%
🖕
8
0.186%
🤮
6
0.139%
14 further kinds
36
0.837%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,999 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 67 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rkp_i. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (16.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В 2026 году тарифы ЖКХ выросли на 12%. Это рекордная величина с 2009 года.
Часто государство объясняет регулярное повышение тарифов общим ростом инфляции в стране.
Например, в 2023 г. Путин говорил:
«Смотрите, жилищно-коммунальные платежи подрастают в зависимости от инфляции. Потому что если они не будут вообще никак подрастать, то у нас ЖКХ, где и так проблем очень много, они копились десятилетиями, ЖКХ-сфера про…
СЛОВО О РЕВОЛЮЦИИ
🚩Путь к новой революции труден и тернист. Сегодня многим кажется, что сил для такой революции нет ни в России, ни в других странах несмотря на все их протесты и забастовки. Но это не так. Сила есть всегда, только в период частичной стабилизации капитализма она бывает представлена очень узким кругом людей. Но когда начинается кризис, эта группа вырастает и превращается во влиятельную политическую си…
ХОЛОДИЛЬНИК ВМЕСТО ОБЩЕСТВЕННОЙ ПРИЁМНОЙ
❗️Глава Верхнетоемского округа Архангельской области Сергей Гуцало предложил населению новую общественную приёмную. Стоит на кухне, работает от розетки:
«Откройте холодильник и прокричите в него всё, что обо мне думаете, а он за это молча выдаст вам еду».
🔴Так чиновник ответил на вопросы о дорогах и освещении посёлка Двинской. Дополнительно глава рекомендовал обнять собаку, …
МЭРИЯ НОВОСИБИРСКА БЛОКИРУЕТ АКЦИИ РКП(и) ЗАЯВКАМИ «МОЛОДОЙ ГВАРДИИ»
Что показало судебное заседание 6 ноября?
✔️Мэрия Новосибирска вновь сорвала проведение 7 ноября акций РКП(и) в центре города. В прошлом году попытка возложения цветов в сквере Героев Революции закончилась задержанием участников и доставкой в полицию. При этом обком КПРФ без проблем получает для шествия и митинга центральную площадь.
🔹Активист РКП…
«…Такова жизнь, и так её надо принимать, смело, уверенно и улыбаясь — несмотря ни на что…» — убеждала Роза Люксембург свою подругу Софи Либкнехт в письме из тюрьмы Бреслау в декабре 1917 года.
Копая траншею на очередной рабочке, уходя в наряд или участвуя в муштре, эти слова я вспоминал чаще всего за последние месяцы. Произошло настолько много событий, со мной и в моё отсутствие, что теперь, выдохнув, я, без лишних …
ТОВАРНЫЙ ФЕТИШИЗМ АНДРЕЯ РУДОГО
📌Наш товарищ Дмитрий Черный оставил отзыв о последней книге Андрея Рудого, признанного Минюстом РФ иноагентом.
⚡️Андрей Рудой* написал книгу «Демократический социализм» и выложил в сеть аудиоверсию главы, посвященной «экономическим проблемам социализма», которую, по сути, можно назвать его каминг-аутом. Подробно рецензировать и обсуждать, да простит меня Андрей Рудой*, там нечего, но…
ТАКАЯ РАЗНАЯ СВОБОДА СОБРАНИЙ:
для КПРФ — центр Новосибирска, для РКП(и) — запрет и на окраины
✔️Приближается 7 ноября, и мэрия Новосибирска включает режим спецоперации, чтобы не допустить проведения мероприятий РКП(и) в центральной части города. Именно РКП(и), так как «самая главная оппозиционная партия», то есть КПРФ, получает от местной буржуазной власти «зелёный свет» на проведение своих акций.
🔹Местный обком К…
«Взяв власть сразу и в Москве и в Питере (неважно, кто начнёт; может быть, даже Москва может начать), мы победим безусловно и несомненно» .
В.И.Ленин «Большевики должны взять власть» (ПСС, т.34, с.239–241)
Товарищи, приглашаем вас присоединиться к пешей прогулке с Дмитрием Чёрным, посвящённой событиям Великой Октябрьской Социалистической революции в Москве.
📌 Встречаемся:
📅 7 ноября
⏰ 12:30
⛲️ Новопушкинский сквер
…
ОДИН НАРОД? ДВА КЛАССА!
Есть много способов вспомнить о том, что мы – «один народ».
Можно зайти в любую муниципальную поликлинику, посмотреть на очереди из обычных людей, а потом полистать рекламные проспекты дорогих частных клиник для состоятельных господ.
Можно почитать новости о жертвах очередной дроновой или ракетной атаки в каком-нибудь российском городе и сразу же переключиться на видео из запрещённой социал…
ПУСТЬ СГНИЁТ, НО ОСТАНЕТСЯ ЧАСТНЫМ?
🥕 В Елизовском округе Камчатки целые поля моркови и картофеля оказались под снегом. Вместо того чтобы попасть на столы людей, урожай остался в земле встречать зиму. По информации телеграм канала «Ревизор Камчатки», речь идёт о сельскохозяйственных землях АО «Заречное».
Увиденное вызвало возмущение жителей. На фоне постоянного роста цен на продукты люди недоумевают: овощи, которые…
О КАКОМ ЕДИНСТВЕ СТОИТ ГОВОРИТЬ?
🔹В этом году государственный праздник проходит в Год единства народов России, объявленный указом президента. Фестивали народного танца и кухни, бесконечная государственная пропаганда «единения». Всё это происходит на фоне деградации социально-экономической сферы на тех самых «национальных окраинах», где живут народы многонациональной России.
🔹Дефицит региональных и нищета муниципаль…
👍55💯19🔥8❤1💊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @rkp_i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
РТФ. Российский Трудовой Фронт @RotFront_su · 24,967 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
Простые числа @primenumbers2021 · 68,551 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Думай сам/Думай сейчас. @dumai_sam_i_sei4as · 29,853 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Рудой @rud01vb · 18,950 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 October 2026
КПРФ @kompartya · 24,745 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026
Диалектик @dialectic_club · 26,302 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
Депутат Ступин @evstupin · 49,077 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Russian Communist Party (International)(en.wikipedia.org) “…org/web/20250228014425/https://t.me/rkp_i/3771|archive-date=2025-02-28}}{{cite web|author=|author-link=|url=https://t.me/rkp_i/4452|title=Дело по…” read 1 November 2026
Российская коммунистическая партия (интернационалистов)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…org/web/20250228014425/https://t.me/rkp_i/3771 |archive-date=2025-02-28 }}{{cite web |author= |author-link= |coauthors= |url=https://t.me/rkp_i/4452 |title=Дело…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РКП(и) - Российская коммунистическая партия (интернационалистов)” (@rkp_i), 6,538 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rkp_i.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.