Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дизайн и ремонт Москва | РЭ Дизайн Бюро

Channel

Дизайн и ремонт Москва | РЭ Дизайн Бюро

@rmexp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,633subscribers

+166 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276249675
TypeChannel
Username@rmexp
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rmexp

Growth

7,4677,6337,5507 August 2026 — 7,467 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,468 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,478 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,488 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,524 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,512 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,526 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,555 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,597 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,633 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 27 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,442–7,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 14:007,633+36
31 Aug 2026, 01:157,597+42
27 Aug 2026, 22:287,555+29
24 Aug 2026, 12:057,526+14
20 Aug 2026, 09:177,512-12
17 Aug 2026, 10:237,524+36
13 Aug 2026, 08:377,488+10
10 Aug 2026, 11:257,478+10
7 Aug 2026, 09:007,468+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:457,467first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 7,633 subscribers
Avg views / post
909
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held39 (12 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total18,181
Reactions total304
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

605 reactions across 36 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23038.0%
🔥15926.3%
👍12019.8%
❤‍🔥274.46%
🍾223.64%
👏182.98%
😍71.16%
50.826%
😱50.826%
🥰50.826%
👌30.496%
💯30.496%
🎉10.165%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 605 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 39 we hold a reading for · 72%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rmexp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC286 views19 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8🍾43😍3🥰1

26 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC594 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Где ошибка?

  1. 1️⃣ Неправильно расположена розетка34%
  2. 2️⃣ Не хватает рабочей поверхности13%
  3. 3️⃣ Неверно расположена посудомоечная машина42%
  4. 4️⃣ Слишком близко мойка и варочная панель21%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC551 views11 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

Что здесь не так? 👀 Мы специально изменили одну деталь в планировке кухни из нашего реального дизайн-проекта. Сможете найти ошибку? Голосуйте ниже — правильный ответ и исходный чертёж оставили в комментариях.

🔥63👏2

24 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC796 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Бесплатная консультация: что предусмотреть до ремонта Можно ли заранее понять, где ремонт может неожиданно стать дороже? За 18 лет и 400+ реализованных проектов мы видели десятки сценариев, из-за которых ремонт внезапно становился дороже. Не предусмотрели инженерное решение — пришлось переделывать. Поздно выбрали напольные покрытия — не сошлись уровни пола. Не продумали мебель — пришлось переносить электрику. Не у

10🔥4👍1

22 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC850 views21 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Video

Почему эта двушка лучше трёшки? Разбираем планировку 72 м² В ЖК «Сердце столицы» мы реализовали смелый проект: превратили стандартную трешку в стильную двушку. В итоге владельцы получили не просто «комнаты», а настоящие функциональные зоны. Что мы сделали: ✅ Объединили кухню и гостиную в 30 м² для приема гостей; ✅ Вынесли хранение в отдельную гардеробную (освободили спальню); ✅ Сделали приватный блок с санузлом для

🔥108👍3

21 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC829 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Какое решение вам понравилось больше всего?

  1. 1️⃣ Карниз в промежуточном оттенке24%
  2. 2️⃣ Тонированное зеркало29%
  3. 3️⃣ Гипсовые панели38%
  4. 4️⃣ Прикроватные тумбы33%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC917 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

7 м², которые вас удивят 😲 Дизайн кухни начинается не с фасадов, а с головы. Вернее, с правильного проекта. В новом ролике мы на реальном примере разбираем 5 золотых правил, которые превращают тесную кухню в эталон комфорта. Смотрим, как мы: ✅Разместили полный набор встроенной техники ✅ Сохранили длинную рабочую поверхность ✅ Визуально увеличили пространство Если ваш ремонт в Москве только в планах — это видео нужн

👍54🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,170 views27 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10🔥7❤‍🔥5😍4🍾1

14 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,100 views24 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

11🔥8🍾3❤‍🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,060 views21 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8👍6🍾4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @rmexp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@rmexp edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

Где ошибка?

  1. 1️⃣ Неправильно расположена розетка34%
  2. 2️⃣ Не хватает рабочей поверхности13%
  3. 3️⃣ Неверно расположена посудомоечная машина42%
  4. 4️⃣ Слишком близко мойка и варочная панель21%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

Какое решение вам понравилось больше всего?

  1. 1️⃣ Карниз в промежуточном оттенке24%
  2. 2️⃣ Тонированное зеркало29%
  3. 3️⃣ Гипсовые панели38%
  4. 4️⃣ Прикроватные тумбы33%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LAB|REMONT & CANDELLI Николая Чубарова (ремонт квартир, дизайн-проект)
@lab_remont · 33,007
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дизайн и ремонт Москва | РЭ Дизайн Бюро” (@rmexp), 7,633 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rmexp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.