Финалку поста выбрал не зря - как чувствовал 🍻 За ЗОЖ!

Channel
Музыченко А. Е.
@rngenjoyer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
236subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001776233052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rngenjoyer |
| Created | 17 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rngenjoyer |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 236 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 237 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 241 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 243 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 246 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 245 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 245 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 244 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 40s
- Average length
- 1m 55s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 34 | 44.7% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 13.2% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 6.58% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🍺 ДЕНЬ ПИВА отмечается сегодня! Это международный неофициальный праздник, который отмечают каждый год в ПЕРВУЮ ПЯТНИЦУ августа Ну такое мы точно отпразднуем 😏
👍1👏1
ВОТ СКОЛЬКО ЛЮДЕЙ ХОДЯТ НА КОЛОБКА! Ладно, отечественное кино вновь не в фаворе, это вам не смазливые мужики в обтягивающем трико, плюющихся паутиной. Тут ситуация лучше - чёрная Елена Троянская, транс в войске греков и фентаниловая наркоманка в роли Афины - фильм «Одиссея»! Раскупленные дорогущие аймаксы (не путать с айкосами) по всей Москве - наглядный пример борьбы за умы и сердца людей, и это даже при далеко не…
⚡2🍾2👍2🤨1🤷♀1🙉1
🇷🇺 Из русской версии нового «Человека-паука» убрали песню Монеточки Из русской версии фильма «Человек-паук: Новый день», которая появилась в сети в виде экранной копии с официальным дубляжом, вырезали песню Монеточки «Монополия». Вместо нее в фильме звучит трек Рианны S&M. Экранную копию фильма загрузили на RuTube, несмотря на то, что официальный прокат картины в России был отложен. В опубликованной версии также ес…
Учесть предателей незавидна: отмена у обеих сторон))
🐏
🤡1🤩1
Смысл данных пометок?)) Они есть только от СМИ из России и Беларуси. Почему такого нет у СМИ стран Евросоюза, США, Израиля? Двойные стандарты как они есть…
🤡3
112 лет назад Россия вступила в войну, как оказалось, в последнюю войну Империи. Все началось с радостного воодушевления, а закончилось поражением от проигравшего противника, тяжелейшей Гражданской войной и гибелью миллионов русских людей. Могла Империя победить и стать куда более мощной? Могла и была обязана это сделать. Проиграла не армия, не Россия, всему виной политическая воля. Через 27 лет СССР вступил в войн…
❤3🤡3👏1🔥1
У нас снова с атакованных объектов десятки фото и видео. У них тишина. Чисто медийно в 21 веке неважно сколько ты поразил целей Важна картинка. А она такова - у нас горит, у них нет. Почему самсебережиссеры не снимают на следующий день штурм посадки в своем исполнении, или цикл передач "У нас в СИЗО" на экшн камеры загадка сие великая есть #медиа @donrf22
🤡3
Что у народников века 19 (примитивных унтерменшей), что у имбицилов с государства 404 одни и те же методы - террор, террор и ещё раз террор Когда же нацистская падаль получит по заслугам…
⚡3🤡3🔥2😁2👏1🤬1
Попытка убийства главкома ВКС. Скорее всего это главная цель теракта.
🤡2
Чемпионат закончился, а «разумные» траты средств - продолжаются!) Даже сейчас достать эти наклейки - задача не из простых, ловим момент 🌞
🥰2🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rngenjoyer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@warhistoryalconafter · 482,3552 postsБольшая мировая политика
@BigWorldPolitics · 5,5461 postАндрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 183,1511 postРусский императив
@cybersotnik · 34,3351 postDonrf
@donrf22 · 66,1301 postПФК ЦСКА
@pfccskamoscow · 179,7121 postРифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,414,5521 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kruzhok_olimp · 39,711
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Музыченко А. Е.” (@rngenjoyer), 236 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rngenjoyer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.