Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rerum Niggarum // Incelligence 🇮🇱

Channel

Rerum Niggarum // Incelligence 🇮🇱

@rnincel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

10,660subscribers

+2,946 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002637495656
TypeChannel
Username@rnincel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rnincel

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,71410,6609,1877 August 2026 — 7,714 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,714 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,724 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,792 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,919 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,022 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,140 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,203 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,283 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,442 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,592 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,687 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,793 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,037 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,370 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,641 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,903 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,045 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,097 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,130 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,175 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,210 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,245 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,285 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,320 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,331 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,363 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,381 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,410 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,438 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,465 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,492 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,519 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,554 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,574 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,602 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,620 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,640 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,660 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
39 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,946. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,272–11,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 00:4010,660+20
6 Nov 2026, 00:5010,640+20
5 Nov 2026, 02:1910,620+18
4 Nov 2026, 02:5810,602+28
3 Nov 2026, 05:1110,574+20
2 Nov 2026, 03:3710,554+35
1 Nov 2026, 00:0610,519+27
30 Oct 2026, 20:4110,492+27
29 Oct 2026, 21:3110,465+27
28 Oct 2026, 19:0810,438+28
27 Oct 2026, 16:1010,410+29
26 Oct 2026, 16:1110,381+18
25 Oct 2026, 14:5810,363+32
24 Oct 2026, 15:4010,331+11
23 Oct 2026, 19:0110,320+35
22 Oct 2026, 16:1510,285+40
21 Oct 2026, 08:3810,245+35
20 Oct 2026, 06:4910,210+35
19 Oct 2026, 06:0710,175+45
18 Oct 2026, 04:2610,130first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 10,660 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held41 (19 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total15,100
Reactions total774
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 12s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,489 reactions across 41 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,46358.8%
😁52621.1%
🎉1757.03%
🔥672.69%
❤461.85%
😭381.53%
🍾230.924%
💅170.683%
👍120.482%
💯120.482%
🫡110.442%
👏100.402%
😱90.362%
🌚70.281%
🤡70.281%
🍓60.241%
😢50.201%
✍40.161%
💩40.161%
😍40.161%
19 further kinds431.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 22:27 UTC390 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸⚡️- BREAKING: U.S. CENTCOM Commander Adm. Brad Cooper resigns from bombing children and starts his own podcast. The decision reportedly came after the GOP lost both chambers of Congress, insiders told Bloomberg

🤣37🤮3

4 Nov 2026, 21:44 UTC311 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @shiachudsPhoto

The Wall Street Journal stole the article last time, it seems it was too realistic.

😁15🤣11👏3❤1

30 Oct 2026, 23:20 UTC644 views52 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @shiachudsPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣44🤯4😁3🤡1

30 Oct 2026, 16:57 UTC608 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @WereallrealniggasPhoto

Rerum follower problems.

🤣54💯10🏆2

30 Oct 2026, 02:15 UTC684 views44 reactionsread 6 November 2026

For worthless information that is readily available from countless other sources for free, visit MINIMAP.TECHNOLOGY

🤣43😭1

29 Oct 2026, 06:45 UTC773 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🐷⚡️- BREAKING: The Pentagon’s chief planner, Army Lieutenant General Brett Sylvia, has been fired after failing to meet Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's aesthetic standards. His uncanny resemblance to a certain animal reportedly led to his ousting.

🤣48😁5❤2🌚1💯1

20 Oct 2026, 04:35 UTC≈2,060 views76 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸⚡️- BREAKING: The U.S. Air Force has announced the liquidation of Tech Sgt. Ian Patterson, a tactical air control party instructor assigned to the 6th Combat Training Squadron, who died in a rappelling accident at a Texas college football game. He has been posthumously given the "Died for Nothing Award," the highest honor in the U.S. military.

🤣58🎉8👍3😁2😢2😭2🙏1

18 Oct 2026, 09:13 UTC≈1,050 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🇸🇦🇾🇪⚡️- BREAKING: Saudi Arabian authorities confirm the liquidation of two of their pilots after their AH-6i helicopter was blown out of the sky by a "technical malfunction."

🎉45😁15❤4👻2

17 Oct 2026, 02:28 UTC≈1,730 views83 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🇲🇽🇮🇶🇸🇦⚡️- BREAKING: The Mexican-run knockoff channel of ours has hit a shocking new low: outright stealing content from the Iraqi channel "Sonia" and passing it off as "obtained" through its own "exclusive sources." It can be easily verified that the Iraqi channel published the information about the deceased Saudi soldiers an hour earlier.

🤣73👍5😱3😭2

14 Oct 2026, 01:11 UTC≈1,170 views64 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🇮🇱⚡️- BREAKING: Prominent Jewish propagandist Ori Goldberg has died.

🎉54🤣7❤3

11 Oct 2026, 13:43 UTC≈2,240 views74 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🇸🇦🇾🇪⚡️- BREAKING: Air defenses activated in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

🤣60😁12🥱1😱1

9 Oct 2026, 12:47 UTC≈2,240 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🇲🇽⚡️- BREAKING: The Mexican admin of our knockoff channel, in an impressive pledge to be wrong about literally everything all the time, posts footage of fireworks in an Asian country and claims they can "confidently state" that they are "aerial mines" being tested by the IRGC.

🤣79😁5😭4👍2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @rnincel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @rnincel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
42 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rerum Niggarum // Incelligence 🇮🇱” (@rnincel), 10,660 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rnincel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.