Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صَحيفة الأدَب والفن.

Channel

صَحيفة الأدَب والفن.

@roakhalid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,112subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001151275813
TypeChannel
Username@roakhalid
Descriptionسِيرة ذَاتية: مُنغمِسة بالأدب والفنّ «كاتبة»
CreatedBetween 1 July 2019 and 31 October 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/roakhalid

Growth

11,03311,14511,0896 August 2026 — 11,051 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,047 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,045 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,044 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,036 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,038 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,040 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,037 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,033 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,035 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,033 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,034 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,035 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,132 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,145 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,137 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,130 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,125 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,117 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,112 subscribers11,1126 August 202628 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 22 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,016–11,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 07:0511,112-5
27 Aug 2026, 05:3411,117-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:5211,125-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:5611,130-7
24 Aug 2026, 00:0911,137-8
20 Aug 2026, 23:3411,145+13
19 Aug 2026, 19:5611,132+97
18 Aug 2026, 20:0711,035+1
17 Aug 2026, 17:2911,034+1
16 Aug 2026, 16:0711,033-2
15 Aug 2026, 00:1711,035+2
13 Aug 2026, 14:3611,033-4
12 Aug 2026, 15:1411,037-3
11 Aug 2026, 15:0711,040+2
10 Aug 2026, 16:4211,038+2
9 Aug 2026, 19:5111,036-8
8 Aug 2026, 22:2111,044-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:0311,045-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:4211,047-4
6 Aug 2026, 05:0611,051first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 11,112 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
36
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held48 (21 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total69,838
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
558
Videos
6
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC411 viewsread 28 August 2026

‏صدّقيني يا ميلينا، أنتِ روعة الأشياء البائسة ! ‏وأنتِ الحياة لكلّ جذوري اليابسة ‏- من كافكا إلىٰ ميلينا

27 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC582 viewsread 28 August 2026

‏"انتشى بالاحتمالات ‏و الجرأة المتهوّرة ‏و الخوف الشديد"

26 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC756 viewsread 28 August 2026

فارَقتُكُم فَإِذا ما كانَ عِندَكُمُ قَبلَ الفِراقِ أَذىً بَعدَ الفِراقِ يَدُ إِذا تَذَكَّرتُ ما بَيني وَبَينَكُمُ أَعانَ قَلبي عَلى الشَوقِ الَّذي أَجِدُ أبو الطيب المتنبي

26 Aug 2026, 01:13 UTC780 viewsread 28 August 2026

«عليلٌ، وكلٌّ يحسَبُني المداوي!»

24 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC939 viewsread 28 August 2026

‏ولِلَّهِ لَيْلٌ يَمْلأُ القَلبَ هَوْلُهُ ‏وقد قَلِقَتْ بالنّائِمِينَ المَرَاقِدُ ‏- الشريف الرضي.

21 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC≈1,580 viewsread 28 August 2026

عاجزةٌ أن أرتاح، على أُهبةِ الفرارِ دائمًا، رغمَ أنّه لا مَفرّ . — أليسون كرونشتادت

20 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 28 August 2026

‏أفهم ألبير كامو حين قال :«أنا دائمًا على حافّة شيء ما، لا أعلم إن كنت سأقع أو سأطير»

20 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 28 August 2026

ولو كُنتِ فأسًا، فإني الأشجار التي تنمو لأجلكِ غدًا بكل سرور. عايدرَزّاق

20 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 28 August 2026

تَعَجَّبوا مِن تَمَنّي القَلبِ مُؤلَمَهُ وَما دَرَوا أَنَّهُ خِلوٌ مِنَ الأَلَمِ! — الشريف الرضِّي

19 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 28 August 2026

«يا أُمَّ عوفٍ وما يُدريكِ ما خَبَأتْ لنا المقاديرُ من عُقبى ويُدرينا» — الجواهري.

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @roakhalid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 78,666 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ودّ القيس
@WD_27 · 62,409
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
عصير الكتب
@book_juice · 92,795
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صَحيفة الأدَب والفن.” (@roakhalid), 11,112 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roakhalid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.