议案132 由 传道士/善行军救国会 提出 提议,中华民国,要建立自己的专业评道,供众多各种进步人士投放作品,发表各种思想表述,形成类似一种标志性的刊物!简单说就是创办属于我们自己表达我们政治方向的刊物!我们不能只是简简单单的聊天发泄,而是要学会发表文章表达自己的政治建议,构筑未来国家命运的策略。 此议案表决通过,请议案提出议员跟进议案实施执行进度。

Channel
中華民國大陸臨時國會議案
@roccongressproposals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
174subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001688837265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roccongressproposals |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 15 November 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roccongressproposals |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 174 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 175 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 177 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 177 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 71.4% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2022 to 12 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
议案131 由 @HKdandelionforever 提出 我提案國會就土耳其敘利亞大地震受難者表達哀悼,並祝兩國傷者早日康復,完畢 Kurisu Makise 表达哀悼的方式我认为可以以信函(G-mail)的形式传达给两国有关机构。 此提议表决通过。
议案0130 由 @barbuL99L09L28 提出 我認為這個解決這個問題的方法,是為各位抗爭者設立一個跨國安全保障的平台,由身處海外的反共義士所經營,當淪陷區內的抗爭者活動後如有任何安全問題及時給與支援,包括支援抗爭者逃離共匪的追捕,幫助有需要抗爭者逃出中共國,讓抗爭者知道我們是有支援的。我想這樣,才足以讓有心反共擔心安全的抗爭者無後顧之憂的加入到我們的反共活動中,從而擔起反共大旗。 @Arm_of_ian 我本來想請他補充一下然後再考慮是否附議的 不過反正現在也沒差 就現在請他補充吧,主要想讓他補充一下平台的運作模式 發言完畢。 @barbuL99L09L28 首先,這個平台需要身處海外的可靠的人士負責管理運作,因為涉及個人安全信息所以這個平台的運營者必須可靠,另外求助者經過評估後如確定需要支援需制度一套安全程序,包括一開始提供什麼資料,評估如何支援,每一步提供什麼資料都需要再集思廣益制訂。 這個平台的設立是非常…
👍3❤1
议案0129 由 传道士/善行军救国会 提出 要求有能力的科技人员,尽快发明梯子病毒,能够自动过滤黄网又能够通过梯子病毒链接外网的网络武器,通过梯子病毒让更多的人看清共产党的真面目,从而加快倒习灭共的速度,梯子病毒的发明必须要有过滤黄网的能力,不然反而会很被动影响民主革命进程。 武清 我们现在的当务之急不应该是渗透到墙内吗? @xiaocai999 咱们曾经建立了大陆临时国会网站,但是根本没有利用好,能否学习法轮功的网站那样,在网站内部嵌入vpn,另外我们的大陆临时国会网站也要经常更新!好好利用这个宣传窗口 传道士/善行军救国会 梯子病毒是直接突破共产党的网,大规模的直接让中国奴隶的手机接触梯子翻墙,当每个人的手机通过梯子病毒都具有了翻墙的能力,那么共产党如果通过翻墙来逮捕民主革命运动勇士呢?那么共产党如何防止中国人进行言论自由呢?所以必须要研究梯子病毒,布置到每个人的手机里面,或者如果有能力可以直接联系安卓苹果开发一款…
议案0128 由 @HKdandelionforever 提出 主題:推動匪佔區資訊自由獎學金法 內容:為鼓勵匪佔區年青學子投身IT行業,進行破壞匪偽當局的網絡封鎖的工程,本人提議成立一獎學金,鼓勵匪佔區就讀IT課程的學子(包括港澳)進行破壞匪偽網絡審查,公開秘密文件黑客行動等工作,凡成功以IT技術破壞匪佔區網絡封鎖工作,或發表促進此等事業技術的論文者,中華民國政府應獎賞該等學子獎學金,金額由國會每年預算案制訂之。 @xiaocai999 建议成立相关部门推动此事,比如招聘技术人才等 此议案表决通过!
议案0127 由 人民万岁 提出 8.公民没有宣传已被国际组织定性为极端宗教的宗教的权利 9.任何公民不得以已被国际织定性为极端宗教的宗教的名义举办宗教活动 10.坚持世俗主义,反对政教合一 11.反对任何带有宗教色彩的政党参加选举和获得国会席位 12.反对任何带有宗教色彩的政党的党员参加选举和成为国会议员 13.政府有权利取缔实行极端活动的宗教 14.政府有权利对实行极端活动的宗教的极端信徒进行逮捕和实施刑事处罚 玉子乌 第7条不同意,既然已经被国际定义为极端宗教,又为何要信?如何监管信教人员不宣传,不组织活动? 人民万岁 第八九条已经明确写明了公民有信仰其宗教的权利但是没有组织宗教活动和宣传宗教的权利,宣传极端宗教和组织极端宗教活动的。 @xiaocai999 所谓的宗教自由,即是任何公民不受年龄,性别,种族以及地位的限制,拥有信仰任何宗教的权利! 玉子乌 还是那个问题,如何监管信邪教人员不传教,不组织活动?一旦被…
❤1
议案0126 由 @OIC6575 提出 針對目前中華民國國內外共產黨和台獨份子肆虐,我提議盡快出台一部法律來對抗共黨和台獨份子的反中華民國行動! 此议案无议员附议,已搁置
议案0125 由 @coincode 提出 本人发起雅典娜基金会,以雅典娜基金会名义向国会申请国债服务商资格认证,以下为一些初步规则,希望讨论和修正并审批。 《雅典娜基金会投标国债管理服务商》 甲方:中华民国大陆临时政府财政部 乙方:雅典娜基金会 01.乙方提供国债虚拟币专用账户; 02.乙方负责国债购买记账; 03.乙方负责国债转卖记账; 04.乙方负责执行甲方授权之支付; 05.乙方负责免费提供服务; 06.乙方必须公示所有账变; @gangyuan0427 雅典娜基金会由谁管理,乙方谁负责? @coincode 雅典娜基金会是由我 @coincode 发起,以作为一个非官方组织来推动一些事务。 @gangyuan0427 雅典娜基金会既然是由个人管理,如何解决信任问题? @coincode 我 @coincode 无法提供任何担保,只能承诺,相当于用我个人信誉来保证雅典娜基金会的信用,当然,我只是一个匿名大众,这…
👍2
议案0124 由 @HKdandelionforever 提出 提案:設立光復大陸設計研究委員會 本議案皆在完善準備光復後大陸過渡準備工作。 1.有鑑於民國111年8月6日本人提出並獲通過的《大陸光復後行政》議案爭議太大,本人提出撤銷。 2.本人提出成立光復大陸設計研究委員會,以研究大陸光復後過渡時期的準備方案,該委員會由行政院管理並設立下列分部門: A. 國際條約清算 B. 金融體制過渡 C. 大陸地區臨時國內法制清算 D. 港澳地區 E. 兩岸事務 F. 不管部 @coincode 国会本来是有各种委员会的,建议启用国会委员会机制,成立相关课题研究委员会,从由行政院主持移至国会,比如土地政策研究委员会,比如腊肉币过渡金融政策研究委员会。 @kRjR5 建议“不管部”采用更官方化的名字,例如“其他事物处理部”或更好的名字 @HKdandelionforever 不管部英譯minister without portfoli…
议案0123 由 @coincode 提出 在此提出禁止共产主义法案,国民与公民释义请回顾之前法案提案【个体权利临时法案】,已发到闲聊群。 《共产主义禁止临时法案》 01.国民有支持共产主义的权利; 02.国民有宣传共产主义的权利; 03.国民无组织共产主义相关团体的权利; 04.国民无参与共产主义相关团体的权利; 05.任何组织不得支持共产主义; 06.任何组织不得宣传共产主义; 07.任何组织支持宣传共产主义将被罚款; 08.任何组织可组织共产相关学术性讨论辩论; 09.任何共产主义组织将被解散取缔并罚没资产; 10.国民组织共产社团将被罚款; 11.国民参与共产社团将被罚款; 12.国民举报共产主义社团将获奖励; @kRjR5 此处共产主义如何定义,如果只是简单的共同生产共同享有,则不算作共产主义,我认为此处的共产主义应该详细定义,避免未来可能存在误伤的情况 @coincode 此项我个人认为可以由法院法官来裁定,…
议案0122 由 @xiuluoyishan 提出 关于中国的网络环境与其他地区不同的处境。香港和台湾一直处于网络完全开放的情况。但中国,整个境内除了少部分人拥有VPN 以外大多数人文明程度并不能达到这个境地。我确实做过社会调查,不少人还拿着共产党的歪理在那边辩驳。我们无法通过网络快速让更多的人认清真相,以及提升他们的文明和道德。我无法解决这个问题。也一直想不到解决方向。但我知道这是问题关键。今天的主要社会矛盾,是人民的高度文明和政府的高度野蛮的矛盾。但人民的文明程度并不够。对文明的解释举例,就像清朝时,欧洲人都知道地球是圆的。但当时的清朝人会说自古以来就是天圆地方。文明的基础若不能提升,后面所有的工作都会事倍功半。我不是那种和理非,就在刚刚,我手持短刀。隔着门,把两个警察劝走了。因为我今天在微信上发信息。问题还是问题,这是我们要考虑的。我没有方向,希望有人能多找些程序员,开发更多的VPN 软件。让人们翻墙的成本变得更低。 …
议案0121 由 善行门/传道士/善行军 提出 我提议,直接性质的反对还是海外勇士为主,国内暗行为辅。 倒习口号运动 第一,我们应该加强海外联系,让海外勇士在中国领事馆门口高喊倒习口号,高喊还原胡锦涛老先生被强迫立场的事实真相,高喊习近平政变夺权的非法性质。 这样习近平因为内心恐惧必然会愚蠢的做出彻底的闭关锁国行为,彻底闭关锁国之后,中国人民绝大部分企业就会全部关闭,大规模的人民就会失业。在无数人失去生计的时候,国内就会产生巨大的反抗力量。 第二,在国内尽量不要与共产国产生直接对抗,因为恶习早就声称要杀几千万人头,早就想通过一场大屠杀获得与邓小平一样的效果,我们不能够给恶习送人头。 在国内我们要秘密的把国外的倒习运动输入国内,让人民慢慢充满勇气并智慧的反抗,国内反抗运动我们要只喊倒习口号,同时发出揭露胡锦涛老先生被强迫驱赶会场真相,增加全国人民对恶习的反感,增加全国共产党员对恶习的不信任…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roccongressproposals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 11
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 11
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@roccongressproposals named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 4 posts, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中華民國大陸臨時國會議案” (@roccongressproposals), 174 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roccongressproposals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.