Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rock wizzard

Channel

rock wizzard

@rockwiz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002642262963
TypeChannel
Username@rockwiz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rockwiz

Growth

121.57 August 2026 — 1 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 36 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–2 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 16:202+1
15 Aug 2026, 04:021no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:431first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC2 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @tacospebblesPhoto

https://beige.party/@intransitivelie/117057396732763183

7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC13 viewsread 15 August 2026

Open source - is a cult where nobody even considers negative sides of it.

30 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026

Any, and I repeat ANY LLM - is just a black box COMPRESSION ALGORITHM. (honestly, not even black box, we know exactly how every one of them works) If you take all the data in the world and compress it, and then sell to people - you will go to jail for life. Yet they literally do the same. But call it cute names like "training" to make it sound NOT like compression. But that is literally what it is. Every AI comp

30 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC3 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @NonsenseFundingTwerpsPhoto

https://www.404media.co/ai-companies-are-buying-tons-of-old-books-because-theyre-free-of-ai-slop/

16 Jul 2026, 22:12 UTC3 viewsread 15 August 2026

“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.” -George Orwell

14 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @channel_31557600Photo

Current state of affairs in the AI world Source: https://www.artfish.ai/p/offloading-thinking-to-ai

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rockwiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rock wizzard” (@rockwiz), 2 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rockwiz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.