Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rodi_with_love

Channel

Rodi_with_love

@rodiwithlove

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

381subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001507985493
TypeChannel
Username@rodiwithlove
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rodiwithlove

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3793853829 August 2026 — 384 subscribers10 August 2026 — 385 subscribers18 August 2026 — 383 subscribers24 August 2026 — 385 subscribers1 September 2026 — 379 subscribers17 September 2026 — 381 subscribers3819 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 03:36381+2
1 Sept 2026, 13:13379-6
24 Aug 2026, 16:35385+2
18 Aug 2026, 01:52383-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:58385+1
9 Aug 2026, 06:16384first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4484.6%
👍23.85%
💯23.85%
👏11.92%
😍11.92%
🤝11.92%
🥰11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC85 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Иногда телу достаточно создать правильные условия, чтобы оно само продолжило свою работу. И ванна, и самый обычный унитаз могут стать настоящими помощниками. ❤А вы знали, что унитаз считается одним из самых полезных «инструментов» в родах? Что помогло вам во время ваших родов?

❤3👍2💯2🤝1🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC167 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Это были роды, которые еще раз напомнили мне: торопить природу не нужно. Катя долго проживала тот самый прелиминарный период. Схватки приходили и затихали, силы постепенно заканчивались, а ожидание становилось все тяжелее. Многие женщины в этот момент начинают сомневаться в себе. Думают, что с ними что-то не так. Но организм не бездействовал. Он созревал. Когда Катя приехала в роддом, шей…

❤15

22 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC185 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Поговорим про наших любимых питомцев 🐶 Как индивидуальная акушерка, я часто обсуждаю с будущими родителями не только роды и послеродовый период, но и подготовку домашних животных к появлению малыша. И как хозяйка собаки прекрасно понимаю, что питомец — полноценный член семьи. Поэтому ему тоже нужна мягкая адаптация к изменениям. Подготовка занимает всего несколько недель, но помогает избежать лишнего стресса и сде…

❤4👏1

9 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC241 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

У вас был партнер на родах?

  1. Да76%
  2. Нет, не смог6%
  3. Нет, не хотел18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC249 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Видео, которое неожиданно для меня самой залетело в запрещенной сети 😆 Не берите партнера на роды. Серьезно. По крайней мере, пока не проверите его по этому списку. 🚩 Если он говорит: «Я не люблю больницы, мне плохо от вида крови. Я боюсь врачей и больничной атмосферы». Но ведь и вы тоже не мечтали провести там несколько часов со схватками, успокаивая партнера. 🚩 Если на температуру 37,2 он пишет завещание и проси…

❤3

6 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC235 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

История родов Арсения 💙 Есть семьи, с которыми знакомишься задолго до дня рождения малыша. Так было и с Людой и Ромой. Мы встретились, когда беременность была чуть больше 30 недель. Ребята мечтали о мягких, бережных родах, где будет место спокойствию, уважению к естественному процессу и поддержке близких людей. Вместе мы выбрали роддом в Одинцово, врача по их запросу — Ольгу Кыртикову, и стали ждать встречи с малыш…

❤19😍1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @rodiwithlove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

У вас был партнер на родах?

  1. Да76%
  2. Нет, не смог6%
  3. Нет, не хотел18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Удаленная РАБОТА
@Udalennaya_Rabota5 · 60,327
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rodi_with_love” (@rodiwithlove), 381 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodiwithlove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.