Channel
@rodya_rdsar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
262subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002007835098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rodya_rdsar |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rodya_rdsar |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 262 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 268 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 267 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 265 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 265 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
323 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5998843468716184159 | 96 | 29.7% | |
| custom 5194954774931325273 | 87 | 26.9% | |
| custom 5796177126092705553 | 72 | 22.3% | |
| custom 5213440872519084905 | 23 | 7.12% | |
| custom 5213324947056789676 | 22 | 6.81% | |
| custom 6019431677917401312 | 13 | 4.02% | |
| custom 5213475945222015280 | 10 | 3.10% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребят, изучение блендера у меня отнимает много сил, но по-прежнему желание остается. Я вижу в тт пошли массовые отписки (видимо из-за отсутствия эдитов), но суть не так важна, скоро восстановимся. В изучении данной проги мне так же помогает прекрасная эдиторша 29yanaa. Давайте её пожалуйста поддержим подписочкой? Она реально делает годные эдиты 🙏
custom 59988434687161841599custom 51949547749313252737custom 57961771260927055534
АХАХАХАХАХА ПОЗДОРОВАЙТЕСЬ С НИМ
custom 599884346871618415919custom 60194316779174013127custom 57961771260927055536custom 51949547749313252733
Пока что туго всё идёт, но не сдаемся!
custom 521344087251908490514custom 59988434687161841596custom 51949547749313252735
Чет пока пытался тут что-то сделать, Флинс успел деформироваться
custom 521347594522201528010custom 51949547749313252734custom 59988434687161841593
Ну чтоооо... похимичем?
custom 519495477493132527313custom 57961771260927055535custom 52133249470567896763
Тик ток - ты лучший! Спасибо за снос видосов ✌️
custom 519495477493132527312custom 57961771260927055536custom 52133249470567896764
Очень хочу выбить Инефу и в случае чего попробовать Арле достать ХОТЯ БЫ ЕЕ ОДНУ ВПЕРВЫЕ ЗА СТОЛЬКО ЛЕТ
custom 51949547749313252738custom 59988434687161841596custom 57961771260927055533
🤍Официальные баннеры 7.0🤍 Информация со стрима разработчиков ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Первая половина: С 12 августа по 2 сентября 👩Одетта — 5★❄️⚔️ 👰♀️Арлекино — 5★🔥🪈 🧑Алёша — 4★⚡️🪈 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Вторая половина: С 2 сентября по 22 сентября 👩Инеффа — 5★⚡️🪈 🧑Флинс — 5★⚡️🪈 🌻Мой Тикток •⚙️Мой Ютуб
custom 59988434687161841596custom 51949547749313252735custom 57961771260927055533
Новый персонаж Алеша в геншине буквально является Алешей Поповичем, т. к. у него буквально есть свой Тугарин Змей АХАХАХАХАХАХА
custom 59988434687161841599custom 51949547749313252733custom 57961771260927055533
Так.. ну если залетит, то можно будет подумать насчет версии этого эдита с Фатуи 😇
custom 519495477493132527314custom 57961771260927055534custom 52133249470567896763
#blade #kafka #silverwolf #firefly #hsr Кафка есть, Света тоже, а Волчика и Блейда я обязательно выбью 🙏 Ib: Scilentio 📱 Поддержать публикацию в тт 📱
custom 579617712609270555318custom 52134408725190849059custom 59988434687161841598
Доктор, ему уже ничего не поможет...
custom 599884346871618415917custom 51949547749313252734custom 57961771260927055534
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rodya_rdsar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“rdsar” (@rodya_rdsar), 262 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodya_rdsar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.